David Aronoff

Dr. David Aronoff

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCarlos H. Serezani
Carlos H. Serezani
Megan BallingerMegan Ballinger
Megan Ballinger
DADavid Aronoff
David Aronoff
MPMarc Peters-Golden
Marc Peters-Golden
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was the original "second messenger" to be discovered. Its formation is promoted by adenylyl cyclase activation after ligation of G protein-coupled receptors by ligands including hormones, autocoids, prostaglandins, and pharmacologic agents. Increases in intracellular cAMP generally suppress innate immune functions, including inflammatory mediator generation and the phagocytosis and killing of microbes. The importance of the host cAMP axis in regulating antimicrobial defense is underscored by the fact that microbes have evolved virulence-enhancing strategies that exploit it. Many clinical situations that predispose to infection are associated with increases in cAMP, and therapeutic strategies to interrupt cAMP generation or actions have immunostimulatory potential. This article reviews the anatomy of the cAMP axis, the mechanisms by which it controls phagocyte immune function, microbial strategies to dysregulate it, and its clinical relevance.

1 February 2016 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMary A. M. Rogers
Mary A. M. Rogers
DADavid Aronoff
David Aronoff

1 July 2004 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADavid Aronoff
David Aronoff
CCClaudio Canetti
Claudio Canetti
MPMarc Peters-Golden
Marc Peters-Golden
Prostaglandin E2 is a potent lipid mediator of inflammation that effects changes in cell functions through ligation of four distinct G protein-coupled receptors (E-prostanoid (EP)1, EP2, EP3, and EP4). During pneumonia, PGE2 production is enhanced. In the present study, we sought to assess the effect of endogenously produced and exogenously added PGE2 on FcRγ-mediated phagocytosis of bacterial pathogens by alveolar macrophages (AMs), which are critical participants in lung innate immunity. We also sought to characterize the EP receptor signaling pathways responsible for these effects. PGE2 (1–1000 nM) dose-dependently suppressed the phagocytosis by rat AMs of IgG-opsonized erythrocytes, immune serum-opsonized Klebsiella pneumoniae, and IgG-opsonized Escherichia coli. Conversely, phagocytosis was stimulated by pretreatment with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. PGE2 suppression of phagocytosis was associated with enhanced intracellular cAMP production. Experiments using both forskolin (adenylate cyclase activator) and rolipram (phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor) confirmed the inhibitory effect of cAMP stimulation. Immunoblot analysis of rat AMs identified expression of only EP2 and EP3 receptors. The selective EP2 agonist butaprost, but neither the EP1/EP3 agonist sulprostone nor the EP4-selective agonist ONO-AE1-329, mimicked the effects of PGE2 on phagocytosis and cAMP stimulation. Additionally, the EP2 antagonist AH-6809 abrogated the inhibitory effects of both PGE2 and butaprost. We confirmed the specificity of our results by showing that AMs from EP2-deficient mice were resistant to the inhibitory effects of PGE2. Our data support a negative regulatory role for PGE2 on the antimicrobial activity of AMs, which has important implications for future efforts to prevent and treat bacterial pneumonia.

1 January 2005 in Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAndrej A Romanovsky
Andrej A Romanovsky
MAMaria Almeida
Maria Almeida
DADavid Aronoff
David Aronoff
AIAndrei I Ivanov
Andrei I Ivanov
JKJan Pieter Konsman
Jan Pieter Konsman
VTVictoria F Turek
Victoria F Turek
Systemic inflammation is accompanied by changes in body temperature, either fever or hypothermia. Over the past decade, the rat and mouse have become the predominant animal models, and new species-specific tools (recombinant antibodies and other proteins) and genetic manipulations have been applied to study fever and hypothermia. Remarkable progress has been achieved. It has been established that the same inflammatory agent can induce either fever or hypothermia, depending on several factors. It has also been established that experimental fevers are generally polyphasic, and that different mechanisms underlie different febrile phases. Signaling mechanisms of the most common pyrogen used, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been found to involve the Toll-like receptor 4. The roles of cytokines (such as interleukins-1beta and 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) have been further detailed, and new early mediators (e.g., complement factor 5a and platelet-activating factor) have been proposed. Our understanding of how peripheral inflammatory messengers cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has changed. The view that the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis is the major port of entry for pyrogenic cytokines has lost its dominant position. The vagal theory has emerged and then fallen. Consensus has been reached that the BBB is not a divider preventing signal transduction, but rather the transducer itself. In the endothelial and perivascular cells of the BBB, upstream signaling molecules (e.g., pro-inflammatory cytokines) are switched to a downstream mediator, prostaglandin (PG) E2. An indispensable role of PGE2 in the febrile response to LPS has been demonstrated in studies with targeted disruption of genes encoding either PGE2-synthesizing enzymes or PGE2 receptors. The PGE2-synthesizing enzymes include numerous phospholipases (PL) A2, cyclooxygenases (COX)-1 and 2, and several newly discovered terminal PGE synthases (PGES). It has been realized that the "physiological," low-scale production of PGE2 and the accelerated synthesis of PGE2 in inflammation are catalyzed by different sets of these enzymes. The "inflammatory" set includes several isoforms of PLA2 and inducible isoforms of COX (COX-2) and microsomal (m) PGES (mPGES-1). The PGE2 receptors are multiple; one of them, EP3 is likely to be a primary "fever receptor." The effector pathways of fever start from EP3-bearing preoptic neurons. These neurons have been found to project to the raphe pallidus, where premotor sympathetic neurons driving thermogenesis in the brown fat and skin vaso-constriction are located. The rapid progress in our understanding of how thermoeffectors are controlled has revealed the inadequacy of set point-based definitions of thermoregulatory responses. New definitions (offered in this review) are based on the idea of balance of active and passive processes and use the term balance point. Inflammatory signaling and thermoeffector pathways involved in fever and hypothermia are modulated by neuropeptides and peptide hormones. Roles for several "new" peptides (e.g., leptin and orexins) have been proposed. Roles for several "old" peptides (e.g., arginine vasopressin, angiotensin II, and cholecystokinin) have been detailed or revised. New pharmacological tools to treat fevers (i.e., selective inhibitors of COX-2) have been rapidly introduced into clinical practice, but have not become magic bullets and appeared to have severe side effects. Several new targets for antipyretic therapy, including mPGES-1, have been identified.

1 July 2014 in mBio
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlyxandria M Schubert
Alyxandria M Schubert
MRMary A. M. Rogers
Mary A. M. Rogers
CRCathrin Ring
Cathrin Ring
JMJill Mogle
Jill Mogle
JPJoseph P Petrosino
Joseph P Petrosino
PSPatrick D Schloss
Patrick D Schloss
Antibiotic usage is the most commonly cited risk factor for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infections (CDI). The increased risk is due to disruption of the indigenous microbiome and a subsequent decrease in colonization resistance by the perturbed bacterial community; however, the specific changes in the microbiome that lead to increased risk are poorly understood. We developed statistical models that incorporated microbiome data with clinical and demographic data to better understand why individuals develop CDI. The 16S rRNA genes were sequenced from the feces of 338 individuals, including cases, diarrheal controls, and nondiarrheal controls. We modeled CDI and diarrheal status using multiple clinical variables, including age, antibiotic use, antacid use, and other known risk factors using logit regression. This base model was compared to models that incorporated microbiome data, using diversity metrics, community types, or specific bacterial populations, to identify characteristics of the microbiome associated with CDI susceptibility or resistance. The addition of microbiome data significantly improved our ability to distinguish CDI status when comparing cases or diarrheal controls to nondiarrheal controls. However, only when we assigned samples to community types was it possible to differentiate cases from diarrheal controls. Several bacterial species within the Ruminococcaceae , Lachnospiraceae , Bacteroides , and Porphyromonadaceae were largely absent in cases and highly associated with nondiarrheal controls. The improved discriminatory ability of our microbiome-based models confirms the theory that factors affecting the microbiome influence CDI. IMPORTANCE The gut microbiome, composed of the trillions of bacteria residing in the gastrointestinal tract, is responsible for a number of critical functions within the host. These include digestion, immune system stimulation, and colonization resistance. The microbiome’s role in colonization resistance, which is the ability to prevent and limit pathogen colonization and growth, is key for protection against Clostridium difficile infections. However, the bacteria that are important for colonization resistance have not yet been elucidated. Using statistical modeling techniques and different representations of the microbiome, we demonstrated that several community types and the loss of several bacterial populations, including Bacteroides , Lachnospiraceae , and Ruminococcaceae , are associated with CDI. Our results emphasize the importance of considering the microbiome in mediating colonization resistance and may also direct the design of future multispecies probiotic therapies.

7 October 2017 in Journal of Innate Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRyan Doster
Ryan Doster
LRLisa M. Rogers
Lisa M. Rogers
JGJennifer A. Gaddy
Jennifer A. Gaddy
DADavid Aronoff
David Aronoff
Tissue macrophages are derived from either circulating blood monocytes that originate in the bone marrow, or embryonic precursors that establish residence in tissues and are maintained independent of bone marrow progenitors. Macrophages perform diverse functions including tissue repair, the maintenance of homeostasis, and immune regulation. Recent studies have demonstrated that macrophages produce extracellular traps (ETs). ETs are an immune response by which a cell undergoes “ETosis” to release net-like material, with strands composed of cellular DNA that is studded with histones and cellular proteins. ETs are thought to immobilize and kill microorganisms, but also been implicated in disease pathology including aseptic inflammation and autoimmune disease. We conducted a scoping review to define what is known from the existing literature about the ETs produced by monocytes or macrophages. The results suggest that macrophage ETs (METs) are produced in response to various microorganisms and have similar features to neutrophil ETs (NETs), in that METs are produced by a unique cell death program (METosis), which results in release of fibers composed of DNA and studded with cellular proteins. METs function to immobilize and kill some microorganisms, but may also play a role in disease pathology.