Gianfranco Piccirillo

Prof. Dr. Gianfranco Piccirillo

Department of Internal and Clinical Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00186 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2007 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
DMDamiano Magrì
Damiano Magrì
SMSabrina Matera
Sabrina Matera
MMMarzia Magnanti
Marzia Magnanti
ATAlessia Torrini
Alessia Torrini
FBFrancesco Barillà
Francesco Barillà
Aims The most widely accepted marker for stratifying the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in post myocardial infarction patients is a depressed left ventricular function. Left ventricular ejection fractions (EF) of 35% or less increase the risk of sudden death but values between 35 and 40% raise concern. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism is sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, both associated with increased cardiac repolarization variability. We assessed whether the indices of QT variability from a short-term electrocardiographic (ECG) recording predict sudden death.

1 April 2009 in Heart Rhythm
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
MOMasahiro Ogawa
Masahiro Ogawa
JSJuan Song
Juan Song
VCVoon J. Chong
Voon J. Chong
BJBo Young Joung
Bo Young Joung
PCPeng-Sheng Chen
Peng-Sheng Chen

1 August 2009 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
DMDamiano Magrì
Damiano Magrì
MOMasahiro Ogawa
Masahiro Ogawa
JSJuan Song
Juan Song
VCVoon J. Chong
Voon J. Chong
PCPeng-Sheng Chen
Peng-Sheng Chen

1 August 2006 in Translational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
MMMarzia Magnanti
Marzia Magnanti
SMSabrina Matera
Sabrina Matera
SCSilvia Di Carlo
Silvia Di Carlo
TLTiziana De Laurentis
Tiziana De Laurentis
DMDamiano Magrì
Damiano Magrì

1 November 2002 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
RQRaffaele Quaglione
Raffaele Quaglione
MNMarialuce Nocco
Marialuce Nocco
CNCamilla Naso
Camilla Naso
AMAntonio Moisè
Antonio Moisè
VMVincenzo Marigliano
Vincenzo Marigliano

23 June 2004 in Clinical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianfranco PiccirilloGianfranco Piccirillo
Gianfranco Piccirillo
CNCamilla Naso
Camilla Naso
AMAntonio Moisè
Antonio Moisè
MLMarco Lionetti
Marco Lionetti
MNMarialuce Nocco
Marialuce Nocco
VMVincenzo Marigliano
Vincenzo Marigliano
Autonomic nervous system control in subjects with vasovagal syncope is controversial. In the present study, we used short-term spectral analysis to evaluate autonomic control in subjects with recurrent vasovagal syncope. We assessed the ability of spectral indices of HR (heart rate) variability to predict tilt-test responses. A series of 47 outpatients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and with positive responses to head-up tilt testing underwent a further study of RR variability during controlled breathing at rest and during tilt testing. During controlled breathing, RR interval variability of total power (TPRR; P<0.001), low-frequency power (LFRR; P<0.05), high-frequency power (HFRR; P<0.001) and HF expressed in normalized units (HFnuRR; P<0.001) were all higher, and LF expressed in normalized units (LFnuRR) and LF/HF ratio were lower in subjects with vasovagal syncope than in controls (P<0.001). To assess the ability of spectral components of RR variability to predict tilt-test responses, we prospectively studied 109 subjects with recurrent vasovagal syncope. The two normalized measures, HFnuRR and LFnuRR, determined during controlled breathing alone predicted a positive tilt-test response (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 99%; positive predictive value, 96%; and negative predictive value, 90%). During tilting, subjects with vasovagal syncope had lower SBP (systolic blood pressure; P<0.05), LF component of peak SBP variability (LFSBP) and LFnuRR than controls, and higher TPRR, HFRR, HFnuRR and α HF (P<0.001). These spectral data indicate that vagal sinus modulation is increased at rest in subjects with vasovagal syncope. Spectral analysis of RR variability during controlled breathing, a procedure that predicts tilt-test responses, could be a useful guide in choosing the method of tilt testing.