Andrea Bernardes

Dr. Andrea Bernardes

General and Specialized Nursing Department, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVanessa Gomes Maziero
Vanessa Gomes Maziero
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
EREline Aparecida Vendas Righetti
Eline Aparecida Vendas Righetti
WSWilza Carla Spiri
Wilza Carla Spiri
CGCarmen Silvia Gabriel
Carmen Silvia Gabriel
Objective: To identify and analyze the existing scientific production on the positive aspects of authentic leadership in the nurse’s work process. Method: This is an integrative literature review. The databases used were Scientific Electronic Library Online; Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences; and National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health. Results: In this study, 17 articles were selected for analysis; 1 study (6%) was published in a national journal, and 16 (94%) were international studies. Of the 17 (100%) articles studied, 11 (65%) were developed in Canada. The hospital environment was present in the 17 (100%) articles. Final considerations: Authentic leadership has several positive aspects that significantly influence the nurse’s work process, such as engagement and job satisfaction, retention of new nurses, organizational commitment, among others.

6 August 2018 in Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniele Bernardi da Costa
Daniele Bernardi da Costa
DRDaniele Ramos
Daniele Ramos
CGCarmen Silvia Gabriel
Carmen Silvia Gabriel
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a cultura de segurança do paciente das equipes de enfermagem no contexto hospitalar. Método: sob o ponto de vista da enfermagem foi realizado um estudo quantitativo, tipo survey, transversal. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre junho e julho de 2013. Foi utilizado o questionário Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, respondido por 437 profissionais da equipe de enfermagem, com taxa de resposta de 100%. Resultados: entre as doze dimensões avaliadas, apenas seis apresentaram taxas de respostas positivas maiores que 50%, sendo frequência de relato de eventos (61,4%), aprendizado organizacional - melhoria contínua (60,5%), respostas não punitivas aos erros (58%), trabalho em equipe dentro da unidade (57,1%), passagem de plantão/turnos e transferências (53,1%) e retorno da informação e comunicação sobre erro (51,8%). Conclusão: para o alcance de cultura de segurança positiva são necessárias ações de melhoria que envolvam a gestão e as chefias no que se refere: percepção geral da segurança; expectativas sobre o supervisor/chefe e ações promotoras da segurança; abertura da comunicação; apoio da gestão hospitalar para a segurança do paciente e trabalho em equipe entre as unidades.

31 March 2023 in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KTKaitlyn Tate
Kaitlyn Tate
TPTatiana Penconek
Tatiana Penconek
BDBruna Moreno Dias
Bruna Moreno Dias
GCGreta G. Cummings
Greta G. Cummings
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
Aim: To examine the influence of hospital culture and authentic leadership on the effects of quality improvement practices on patient satisfaction. Background: Nurses in formal leadership roles shape and are shaped by organizational culture to achieve high performance standards to influence quality of care. Design: Using structural equation modelling, we tested a model on quality improvement practices across three participant groups that differed based on authentic leadership and hospital culture. Methods: We used survey data from a cross‐sectional study conducted in 2015 measuring nurse. Managers' perceptions of authentic leadership, implementation of quality improvement, and organizational culture in Canadian hospitals. Results: 226 nurse managers participated. Our model estimations fit for the high‐relational group and mixed group. Our model explained 50.7% and 39.5% variance in our outcome variable of patient satisfaction for the high‐relational group and mixed group, respectively. Our model failed to fit the low‐relational group. Conclusion: Authentic leadership and developmental/group hospital cultures improve quality management practices, quality of care and patient satisfaction. In organizations with low authentic leadership and hierarchical/rational cultures, strategies should target increasing authentic leadership and shifting to developmental cultures. Organizations with high authentic leadership and/or developmental/group cultures should target employee engagement, autonomy and teamwork. Impact: We examined how different combinations of authentic leadership and hospital culture influence the effects of quality management practices on quality improvement and patient satisfaction. Findings demonstrate that having both high authentic leadership and developmental or group hospital cultures are essential for quality improvement practices to enhance the quality of care and patient satisfaction. These organizations would benefit the most from systemic programs aimed at standardizing quality management practices as they have the culture and leadership to support these practices. For hospitals with hierarchical/rational cultures and/or low authentic leadership, enhancing hospital culture and leadership through leadership training and accreditation programs is critically needed. Patient or Public Contribution: The College and Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta contributed to this study by facilitating data collection and supporting the conduct of the study through messaging to its members.

1 April 2015 in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLucilena Françolin
Lucilena Françolin
CGCarmen Silvia Gabriel
Carmen Silvia Gabriel
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
ASAna Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva
Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva
MBMaria de Fatima Paiva Brito
Maria de Fatima Paiva Brito
JMJuliana Pereira Machado
Juliana Pereira Machado
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the actions of patient safety management developed in hospitals, from the perspective of nurses. METHOD This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study of the survey type. Participants were seven hospitals, in which seven nurse managers and 49 sector coordinator nurses (n = 56) answered the instrument prepared by the author. RESULTS The results showed that 100% of hospitals have an adverse event reporting system, 71.4% have a Risk Management Committee and 80% have discussions about the events. There is agreement that these discussions lead to favorable changes for patient safety in the surveyed institutions. The employees' fear of punishment for their faults, and the underreporting of events were the aspects of greatest weakness found. CONCLUSION The institutions should develop organizational policies focused on stimulating event notification and on the implementation of measures directed to a non-punitive organizational culture.

1 January 2020 in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
CGCarmen Silvia Gabriel
Carmen Silvia Gabriel
GCGreta G. Cummings
Greta G. Cummings
AZAriane Cristina Barboza Zanetti
Ariane Cristina Barboza Zanetti
ALAlexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti
Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti
VMVanessa Gomes Maziero
Vanessa Gomes Maziero
Objective: To investigate relationships among flexible and hierarchical organizational cultures, quality improvement domains, and authentic leadership competencies in Canadian healthcare facilities. Method: Observational cross-sectional study conducted in Alberta, Canada. Nurse managers (n=226) completed a survey including validated measures of organizational culture, quality improvement and authentic leadership. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation coefficient and Chi-squared test (p<0.05). Results: Quality improvement through accreditation is related to organizational culture and authentic leadership. We saw a propensity for participants who reported working in a more flexible culture also reported greater quality improvement implementation and authentic leadership practices. Conclusion: This study assessed and reported the relationships between flexible organizational cultures, quality improvement through the accreditation process, and authentic leadership practices of healthcare managers. Flexible organizational cultures influence the adoption of authentic leadership, participatory management model and also improves quality.

1 January 2020 in Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAriane Cristina Barboza Zanetti
Ariane Cristina Barboza Zanetti
CGCarmen Silvia Gabriel
Carmen Silvia Gabriel
BDBruna Moreno Dias
Bruna Moreno Dias
ABAndrea Bernardes
Andrea Bernardes
AMAndré Almeida de Moura
André Almeida de Moura
AJAntônio José de Lima Júnior
Antônio José de Lima Júnior
Objective: To highlight the scientific production related to the use of the retrospective chart review methods to assess the incidence and preventability of adverse events in hospitals. Method: An integrative review in the MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, Web of Science and EMBASE databases conducted in May 2019 with the following guiding question: What is known about the retrospective chart review methods to assess the incidence and preventability of adverse events in hospitals? Subsequently, the categorization, synthesis, and classification of the evidence levels of the included publications were performed. Results: In the 13 selected studies, the instruments adopted to assess the occurrence of adverse events were the Harvard Medical Practice Study, the Canadian Adverse Event Study, the Quality in Australian Health Care Study, and the Global Trigger Tool. Incidence ranged from 5.7 to 14.2%, while preventability ranged from 31 to 83%. Conclusion: Differences in incidence and preventability were found, showing different results in the quality of care provided, the information registered in medical records, the screening criteria used, and the assessments of the reviewers.