Background and Objectives: Gait ability and spinal postural balance affect ADL in patients who underwent adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, it is still unclear how to determine what the cause is. This study was done to investigate various factors affecting gait, postural balance and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients who were operated on for ASD over a period of one year, following corrective surgery. Materials and Method: A cohort of 42 (2 men, 40 women, mean age, 71.1 years) who were operated on for ASD were included in this study. According to Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), based on their ADL, patients were segregated into satisfied and unsatisfied groups. Gait and postural balance abilities were evaluated before and after the operative procedure. Radiographs of spine and pelvis as well as the rehabilitation data (static balance, standing on single-leg; dynamic postural adaptation, timed up and go test (TUG); Gait Capability, walk velocity for a distance of 10 m) were acquired 12 months after surgery and analyzed. Spinopelvic parameters such as (lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI)) were marked and noted. The factors which affect patients’ satisfaction with their ADL were evaluated. Results: The ADL satisfied group included 18 patients (1 man, 17 women, mean age 68.6 years) and the unsatisfied group included 24 patients (1 man, 23 women, mean age 73.1 years). One year after the surgery, the two groups were tested. TUG (8.5 s vs. 12.8 s), 10 m walk velocity (1.26 m/s vs. 1.01 m/s), and single leg standing test (25 s vs. 12.8 s) were regarded as notably different. According to logistic regression analysis, only TUG was extracted as a significant factor. The cut-off value was 9.7 s, with sensitivity 75%, specificity 83%, area under the curve 0.824, and a 95% confidence interval of 0.695–0.953. Conclusions: A significant factor among all evaluations in postoperative ASD patients was TUG, for which the cut-off value for ADL satisfaction was 9.7 s.

Background and Objectives: The implementation of intraoperative imaging in the procedures performed under the guidance of the same finds its history dating back to the early 1990s. This practice was abandoned due to many deficits and practicality. Later, fluoroscopy-dependent techniques were developed and have been used even in the present time, albeit with several disadvantages. With the recent advancement of several complex surgical techniques, which demand higher accuracy and are in conjunction with the existence of radiation exposure hazard, C-arm-free techniques were introduced. In this review study, we aim to demonstrate the various types of these techniques performed in our hospital. Materials and Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed and collected imaging data of C-arm-free, minimally invasive techniques performed in our hospital. The basic steps of the procedures are described, following with a discussion, along with the literature of findings, enlisting the merits and demerits. Results: MIS techniques of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine that do not require the use of the C-arm can offer excellent results with high precision. However, several disadvantages may prevail in certain circumstances such as the navigation accuracy problem where in the possibility of perioperative complications comes a high morbidity rate. Conclusions: The accustomedness of performing these techniques requires a steep learning curve. The increase in accuracy and the decrease in radiation exposure in complex spinal surgery can overcome the burden hazards and can prove to be cost-effective.

Background: Adult spinal deformity is a complex condition that causes lower back pain, causing spinal imbalance and discomfort in activities of daily life. After corrective spinal surgery, patients’ gait and balance abilities might not revert to normalcy and they might be at increased risk of falling. Therefore, early evaluation of such a risk is imperative to prevent further complications such as a fall, or even worse, fractures in post-surgery ASD patients. However, there has been no report of an investigation of such early changes in gait sway before and after ASD surgery. This is a prospective to investigate changes in gait sway before and following ASD surgery, using accelerometers, and also to examine motor function related to postoperative gait sway. Methods: Twenty patients were included who underwent corrective surgery as treatment for ASD, from October 2019 to January 2023. Measurement parameters included a 10 m walking test and the timed up-and-go test (TUG), gait sway was evaluated using accelerometers (root mean square; RMS), and hip flexion and knee extension muscle strength were tested. RMS included RMS vertical: RMS_V; RMS anterior posterior: RMS_AP; RMS medial lateral: RMS_ML. The radiographic spinopelvic parameters were also evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. p < 0.05 was noted as remarkably significant. Results: Preoperative and postoperative RMS_V were 1.07 ± 0.6 and 1.31 ± 0.8, respectively (p < 0.05). RMS_ML significantly decreased from 0.33 ± 0.2 to 0.19 ± 0.1 postoperatively (p < 0.01). However, RMS_AP did not change postoperatively (0.20 ± 0.2 vs. 0.14 ± 0.1, p > 0.05). Patients’ one-month postoperative hip flexor muscle strength became significantly weaker (0.16 ± 0.04 vs. 0.10 ± 0.03 kgf/kg, p = 0.002), but TUG was maintained (11.6 ± 4.2 vs. 11.7 s, p = 0.305). RMS_V was negatively correlated with quadriceps muscle strength and positively with TUG. RMS_AP was negatively correlated with quadriceps muscle strength. All spinopelvic parameters became normal range after surgery. Conclusions: After corrective spinal fusion for ASD patients, the gait pattern improved significantly. Iliopsoas (hip flexor) and quadriceps femoris (knee extensor) muscles may play important roles for gait anterolateral and vertical swing, respectively.

This is a prospective study that has been done to assess the lumbar sagittal alignment of patients positioned prone over an adjustable hinged carbon fiber operating table. The following three variations of table position have been considered: neutral, 20° convex, and 20° concave bending. A total of 33 patients who underwent lumbar disc herniation and lumbar canal stenosis surgery were enrolled. Patients who presented with spinal deformity akin to lumbar scoliosis or spondylolisthesis were excluded. For the surgical procedure, following the induction of endotracheal general anesthesia, patients were positioned prone on the adjustable hinged carbon fiber operating table. Radiographs of the lateral view of the lumbar spine were acquired for the three table positions, i.e., neutral, 20° convex, and 20° concave. The lumbar lordosis was measured on radiographs. The lumbar lordosis presented divergently in all three variations of the table (p < 0.01): 45.2 ± 11.0° in neutral; 52.0 ± 10.7° in 20° lumbar extension bending; and 35.9 ± 10.8° in 20° lumbar flexion bending. The efficacy of table bending was 46.5% in convex and 34.0% in concave bending. In conclusion, the lumbar lordosis in three different table positions were 35.9° in 20° convex bending, 45.2° in neutral, and 52.0° in concave bending. The efficacy of table bending was 46.5% in convex and 34.0% in concave bending.

Study design: Technical note. Objectives: To present a novel C-arm-free technique guided by navigation to insert and place a C1 lateral mass screw. Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a relatively common sequelae in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and upper cervical trauma. If they present with severe symptoms, surgical intervention such as posterior fusion is indicated. The established treatment for AAS is fixation with a C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw (modified Goel technique) to achieve bony fusion. However, this technique requires fluoroscopy for C1 screw insertion. To avoid exposing the operating team to radiation, we present here a novel C-arm-free C1 lateral mass screw insertion technique for AAS. Materials and Methods: A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital with neck pain, quadriparesis, and clumsiness and numbness of both upper and lower limbs. He had undergone C3–6 posterior fusion previously in another hospital. In physical examination, he had severe muscle weakness of bilateral upper limbs and hypoesthesia of all four limbs. He had hyper-reflexia of bilateral lower limbs and pollakiuria. His Japanese orthopedic score was 8 points out of 17. Preoperative radiograms showed AAS with an atlantodental interval (ADI) of 7 mm. MRI indicated retro-odontoid pseudotumor and severe spinal cord compression at the C1–2 level. The patient underwent posterior atlantoaxial fixation under navigation guidance. To prevent epidural bleeding during the insertion and placement of a C1 lateral mass screw, we have here defined a novel screw insertion technique. Results: The surgical time was clocked as 127 min and blood loss was 100 mL. There were no complications per-operatively or in the postoperative period. The patient showed almost full recovery (JOA 16/17) at two months follow-up and a solid bony fusion was noticed in the radiograms at one year follow-up. Conclusions: This novel surgical procedure and C1 lateral mas screw placement technique is a practical and safe method in recent advances of AAS treatment. Procedurally, the technique helps prevent epidural bleeding from the screw entry point and also allows for proper C1 screw insertion under navigation guidance without exposing surgeons and staff to the risk of fluoroscopic radiation.