Background: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used in the treatment of systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but its effect on lupus activity during pregnancy, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remains unclear. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched before 11 September 2022 for randomized clinical trials (RCT) or observational studies involving additional HCQ treatment and pregnant women diagnosed as having SLE and/or APS/positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Risks of high lupus activity, preeclampsia and IUGR were explored. Results: One RCT and 13 cohort studies were included. A total of 1764 pregnancies were included in the pooled meta-analysis (709 in the HCQ group vs. 1055 in the control group). After the additional use of HCQ, the risk of high lupus activity decreased (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57–0.97, p = 0.03). For preeclampsia, the total incidence decreased (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37–0.78, p = 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed statistical significance in the SLE subgroup (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34–0.78, p = 0.002) but not in the APS/aPLs subgroup (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.29–1.54, p = 0.34). For IUGR, the decrease in incidence was not statistically significant (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47–1.35, p = 0.46), neither in the SLE subgroup (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.40–1.36, p = 0.33) nor in the APS/aPLs subgroup (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.34–4.61, p = 0.73). Conclusion: The additional use of HCQ may decrease the risk of high lupus activity during pregnancy and the incidence of preeclampsia for SLE patients, but the results do not support that using HCQ decreases the incidence of preeclampsia for APS/aPLs patients or reduces IUGR risk for SLE and/or APS/aPLs patients.

Background: The role of antihypertensive drugs in inducing hyperuricaemia and gout has been a long-term concern in clinical practice. However, clinical studies regarding this issue are limited in number and have yielded inconsistent results. We comprehensively evaluated the association between various antihypertensive drugs and the occurrences of hyperuricaemia, gout and related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), aiming to guide the selection of antihypertensive drugs with a goal of minimizing the risk of hyperuricaemia, gout and related AEs.Methods: We used OpenVigil 2.1 to query the FAERS database. Hyperuricaemia, gout and related AEs were defined by 5 Preferred Terms: hyperuricaemia, gout, gouty arthritis, gouty tophus and urate nephropathy. Disproportionality analysis was performed, and a positive signal indicated an association between AEs and antihypertensive drugs.Results: The numbers of antihypertensive drugs with positive signals for hyperuricaemia, gout, gouty arthritis, gouty tophus and urate nephropathy were 46, 66, 27, 8 and 6, respectively. These drugs included diuretics, antihypertensive drugs with central action, α blockers, β blockers, α and β blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, vasodilators, and compound preparations. Furthermore, 42 antihypertensive drugs had positive signal for more than one AEs.Conclusion: Our study suggests that some potassium-sparing diuretics, calcium channel blockers and losartan may be associated with increased risk of hyperuricaemia, gout or related AEs, which is inconsistent with most previous studies. Moreover, Our study also suggests that some antihypertensive drugs with central action, α and β blockers, renin inhibitors and vasodilators may be associated with increased risk of hyperuricaemia, gout or related AEs, which has not been reported in previous studies. These findings complement real-world evidence on the potential risks of hyperuricaemia, gout and related AEs associated with antihypertensive drugs.

Background: Tuberculosis continues to be a significant global burden. Purified protein derivative of tuberculin (TB-PPD) is one type of tuberculin skin test (TST) and is used commonly for the auxiliary diagnosis of tuberculosis. The recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein (EC) test is a new test developed in China.Objective: Evaluate the long-term economic implications of using the EC test compared with the TB-PPD test to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.Methods: The target population was people at a high risk persons of being infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The outcome indicator was quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A cost–utility analysis was used to evaluate the long-term economic implications of using the EC test compared with the TB-PPD test. We employed a decision tree–Markov model from the perspective of the whole society within 77 years.Results: Compared with the TB-PPD test, the EC test had a lower cost but higher QALY. The incremental cost–utility ratio was −119,800.7381 CNY/QALY. That is, for each additional QALY, the EC test could save 119,800.7381 CNY: the EC test was more economical than the TB-PPD test.Conclusion: Compared with the TB-PPD test, the EC test would be more economical in the long term for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection according our study.

Objectives: Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein (EC) was anticipated to be used for the scale-up of clinical application for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in China, but it lacked a head-to-head economic evaluation based on the Chinese population. This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility and the cost-effectiveness of both EC and tuberculin pure protein derivative (TB-PPD) for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the short term.Methods: From a Chinese societal perspective, both cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis were performed to evaluate the economics of EC and TB-PPD for a one-year period based on clinical trials and decision tree model, with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the utility-measured primary outcome and diagnostic performance (including the misdiagnosis rate, the omission diagnostic rate, the number of patients correctly classified, and the number of tuberculosis cases avoided) as the effective-measured secondary outcome. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the base-case analysis, and a scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference in the charging method between EC and TB-PPD.Results: The base-case analysis showed that, compared with TB-PPD, EC was the dominant strategy with an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of saving 192,043.60 CNY per QALY gained, and with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of saving 7,263.53 CNY per misdiagnosis rate reduction. In addition, there was no statistical difference in terms of the omission diagnostic rate, the number of patients correctly classified, and the number of tuberculosis cases avoided, and EC was a similar cost-saving strategy with a lower test cost (98.00 CNY) than that of TB-PPD (136.78 CNY). The sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis, and the scenario analysis indicated cost-utility in EC and cost-effectiveness in TB-PPD.Conclusion: This economic evaluation from a societal perspective showed that, compared to TB-PPD, EC was likely to be a cost-utility and cost-effective intervention in the short term in China.