Background: There is evidence for inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis in the ischemic heart. Autophagy is a physiologic process for tissue survival. Apoptosis, on the other hand, is a mechanism that serves to clear the debris in the setting of tissue injury. The balance between autophagy and apoptosis may be important in cell survival and cardiac function. Methods and Results: We examined the interplay of inflammation and myocyte autophagy and apoptosis during the ischemic process. We subjected mice to total left coronary artery ligation and studied these animals for up to 4 weeks. The inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor [ TNF ]‐α, monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1, interleukin‐6, and interleukin‐1β) and autophagic signals (light chain‐3 and beclin‐1) were strongest during the first week and then began to decline. However, the apoptotic signals peaked at week 2 after left coronary artery ligation, and the elevated levels persisted until the end of the fourth week. To elucidate the role of inflammation in the regulation of myocyte autophagy and apoptosis, we administered TNF ‐α inhibitor ( CAS 1049741‐03‐8, Millipore, Burlington, MA) to the mice daily during the first week of myocardial infarction. Anti‐ TNF ‐α therapy reduced the levels of inflammatory cytokines and the inflammatory cell infiltration in and around the infarct area. However, cardiac function measured by echocardiography (fractional shortening and ejection fraction) worsened with anti‐ TNF ‐α therapy. More importantly, application of TNF ‐α inhibitor markedly inhibited autophagy and promoted myocyte apoptosis in the border zone. Conclusions: These observations suggest that inflammatory response may be protective in the early stage of the myocardial infarction through stimulation of myocyte autophagy. Anti‐inflammatory treatment early after coronary occlusion may have an adverse effect.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs), one type of non-coding RNA, were initially misinterpreted as nonfunctional products of pre-mRNA mis-splicing. Currently, circRNAs have been proven to manipulate the functions of diverse molecules, including non-coding RNAs, mRNAs, DNAs and proteins, to regulate cell activities in physiology and pathology. Accumulating evidence indicates that circRNAs play critical roles in tumor genesis, development, and sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are two primary types of intervention for most cancers, but their therapeutic efficacies are usually retarded by intrinsic and acquired resistance. Thus, it is urgent to develop new strategies to improve therapeutic responses. To achieve this, clarification of the underlying mechanisms affecting therapeutic responses in cancer is needed. This review summarizes recent progress and mechanisms of circRNAs in cancer resistance to radiation and chemotherapy, and it discusses the limitations of available knowledge and potential future directions.