Mark Robertson

Dr. Mark Robertson

Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 October 2009 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBernard W. T. Coetzee
Bernard W. T. Coetzee
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
BEBarend Erasmus
Barend Erasmus
BRBerndt Janse Van Rensburg
Berndt Janse Van Rensburg
WTWilfried Thuiller
Wilfried Thuiller

26 February 2016 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
VVVernon Visser
Vernon Visser
CHCang Hui
Cang Hui

13 April 2010 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
GCG. S. Cumming
G. S. Cumming
BEBarend Erasmus
Barend Erasmus
Aim  To review some of the applications in ecology and conservation biogeography of datasets derived from atlas projects. We discuss data applications and data quality issues and suggest ways in which atlas data could be improved.Location  Southern Africa and worldwide.Methods  Atlas projects are broadly defined as collections or syntheses of original, spatially explicit data on species occurrences. We review uses of atlas datasets and discuss data quality issues using examples from atlas projects in southern Africa and worldwide.Results  Atlas projects must cope with tradeoffs between data quality and quantity, standardization of sampling methods, quantification of sampling effort, and mismatches in skills and expectations between data collectors and data users. The most useful atlases have a good measure of sampling effort; include data collected at a fine enough resolution to link to habitat variables of potential interest; have a sufficiently large sample size to work with in a multivariate context; and offer clear, quantitative indications of the quality of each record to allow for the needs of users who have specific demands for high‐quality data.Main conclusions  Atlases have an important role to play in biodiversity conservation and ideally should aim to offer reliable, high quality data that can withstand public, scientific and legal scrutiny.

21 August 2007 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMM. De Meyer
M. De Meyer
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
APA. Townsend Peterson
A. Townsend Peterson
MMM. W. Mansell
M. W. Mansell

6 September 2004 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
MVMartin Villet
Martin Villet
APAnthony Palmer
Anthony Palmer
A new predictive modelling technique called the fuzzy envelope model (FEM) is introduced. The technique can be used to predict potential distributions of organisms using presence‐only locality records and a set of environmental predictor variables. FEM uses fuzzy logic to classify a set of predictor variable maps based on the values associated with presence records and combines the results to produce a potential distribution map for a target species. This technique represents several refinements of the envelope approach used in the BIOCLIM modelling package. These refinements are related to the way in which FEMs deal with uncertainty, the way in which this uncertainty is represented in the resultant potential distribution maps, and the way that these maps can be interpreted and applied. To illustrate its potential use in biogeographical studies, FEM was applied to predicting the potential distribution of three invasive alien plant species (Lantana camara L., Ricinus communis L. and Solanum mauritianum Scop.), and three native cicada species (Capicada decora Germar, Platypleura deusta Thun. and P. capensis L.) in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. These models were quantitatively compared with models produced by means of the algorithm used in the BIOCLIM modelling package, which is referred to as a crisp envelope model (the CEM design). The average performance of models of the FEM design was consistently higher than those of the CEM design. There were significant differences in model performance among species but there was no significant interaction between model design and species. The average maximum kappa value ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 for FEM design and from 0.57 to 0.89 for the CEM design, which can be described as ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ using published ranges of agreement for the kappa statistic. This technique can be used to predict species’ potential distributions that could be used for identifying regions at risk from invasion by alien species. These predictions could also be used in conservation planning in the case of native species.

26 May 2014 in Journal of Vegetation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAndrew Davies
Andrew Davies
MRMark Robertson
Mark Robertson
SLShaun Levick
Shaun Levick
GAGregory Asner
Gregory Asner
BRBerndt Janse Van Rensburg
Berndt Janse Van Rensburg
CPC. Parr
C. Parr