Keshav Parajuly

Mr. Keshav Parajuly

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2012 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMatthew D. Eisaman
Matthew D. Eisaman
KPKeshav Parajuly
Keshav Parajuly
ATAlexander Tuganov
Alexander Tuganov
CECraig Eldershaw
Craig Eldershaw
NCNorine Chang
Norine Chang
KLKarl A. Littau
Karl A. Littau
An efficient method for extracting the dissolved CO2 in the oceans would effectively enable the separation of CO2 from the atmosphere without the need to process large volumes of air, and could provide a key step in the synthesis of renewable, carbon-neutral liquid fuels. While the extraction of CO2 from seawater has been previously demonstrated, many challenges remain, including slow extraction rates and poor CO2 selectivity, among others. Here we describe a novel solution to these challenges – efficient CO2 extraction from seawater using bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED). We characterize the performance of a custom designed and built CO2-from-seawater prototype, demonstrating the ability to extract 59% of the total dissolved inorganic carbon from seawater as CO2 gas with an electrochemical energy consumption of 242 kJ mol−1(CO2).

1 May 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKeshav Parajuly
Keshav Parajuly
HWHenrik Wenzel
Henrik Wenzel

1 August 2017 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKeshav Parajuly
Keshav Parajuly
KHKomal Habib
Komal Habib
GLGang Liu
Gang Liu

1 December 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RAReynir Atlason
Reynir Atlason
Davide GiacaloneDavide Giacalone
Davide Giacalone
KPKeshav Parajuly
Keshav Parajuly

27 December 2022 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSina Leipold
Sina Leipold
APAnna Petit-Boix
Anna Petit-Boix
ALAnran Luo
Anran Luo
HHHanna Helander
Hanna Helander
MSMachteld Simoens
Machteld Simoens
BXBing Xue
Bing Xue
The current enthusiasm for the circular economy (CE) offers a unique opportunity to advance the impact of research on sustainability transitions. Diverse interpretations of CE by scholars, however, produce partly opposing assessments of its potential benefits, which can hinder progress. Here, we synthesize policy‐relevant lessons and research directions for a sustainable CE and identify three narratives—optimist, reformist, and skeptical—that underpin the ambiguity in CE assessments. Based on 54 key CE scholars’ insights, we identify three research needs: the articulation and discussion of ontologically distinct CE narratives; bridging of technical, managerial, socio‐economic, environmental, and political CE perspectives; and critical assessment of opportunities and limits of CE science–policy interactions. Our findings offer practical guidance for scholars to engage reflexively with the rapid expansion of CE knowledge, identify and pursue high‐impact research directions, and communicate more effectively with practitioners and policymakers.

29 September 2015 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKomal Habib
Komal Habib
KPKeshav Parajuly
Keshav Parajuly
HWHenrik Wenzel
Henrik Wenzel