Introduction: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent an independent predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We assessed the prognostic impact of CTCs according to different first-line systemic treatments, and explored their potential predictive value in MBC patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 235 newly diagnosed MBC patients, treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients had a baseline CTC assessment performed with CellSearch®. Progression-free survival and overall survival were compared with the log-rank test between groups, according to CTC count (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) and type of systemic therapy. We further explored the predictive value of baseline CTCs in patients receiving different treatments. Results: At a median follow-up of 18 months, the CTC count was confirmed to be a robust prognostic marker in the overall population (median progression-free survival 12.0 and 7.0 months for patients with CTC < 5 and ≥ 5, respectively; P < 0.001). Conversely, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressed/amplified tumors receiving trastuzumab or lapatinib, the baseline CTC count was not prognostic (median progression-free survival 14.5 months for patients with CTC < 5 and 16.1 months for those with CTC ≥ 5; P = 0.947). Furthermore, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 normal tumors, a baseline CTC count ≥ 5 identified subjects who derived benefit from more aggressive treatments, including combination chemotherapy and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that the prognostic information provided by CTC count may be useful in patient stratifications and therapeutic selection, particularly in the group with positive CTCs, in which various therapeutic choices may procure differential palliative benefit.
Epithelial cancer cells are likely to undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) prior to entering the peripheral circulation. By undergoing EMT, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) lose epithelial markers and may escape detection by conventional methods. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to investigate mRNA transcripts of EMT‐inducing transcription factors (TFs) in tumor cells from the peripheral blood (PB) of patients with primary breast cancer (PBC). PB mononuclear cells were isolated from 52 patients with stages I–III PBC and 30 healthy donors (HDs) and were sequentially depleted of EpCAM+ cells and CD45+ leukocytes, henceforth referred to as CD45−. The expression levels of EMT‐inducing TFs (TWIST1, SNAIL1, SLUG, ZEB1 and FOXC2) in the CD45− cells were determined using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. The highest level of expression by the CD45− cell fraction of HD was used as “cutoff” to determine if samples from patients with PBC overexpressed any EMT‐inducing TFs. In total, 15.4% of patients with PBC overexpressed at least one of the EMT‐inducing TF transcripts. Overexpression of any EMT‐inducing TF transcripts was more likely to be detected in patients with PBC who received neoadjuvant therapies (NAT) than patients who received no NAT (p = 0.003). Concurrently, CTCs were detected in 7 of 38 (18.4%) patients by CellSearch® and in 15 of 42 (35.7%) patients by AdnaTest™. There was no association between the presence of CTCs measured by CellSearch® or AdnaTest™. In summary, our results demonstrate that CTCs with EMT phenotype may occur in the peripheral circulation of patients with PBC and that NAT is unable to eliminate CTCs undergoing EMT.