Sarah Davis

Dr. Sarah Davis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2009 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis
MMMichael D. Masters
Michael D. Masters
EDEvan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia
One potentially significant impact of growing biofuel crops will be the sequestration or release of carbon (C) in soil. Soil organic carbon (SOC) represents an important C sink in the lifecycle C balances of biofuels and strongly influences soil quality. We assembled and analyzed published estimates of SOC change following conversion of natural or agricultural land to biofuel crops of corn with residue harvest, sugarcane, Miscanthus x giganteus, switchgrass, or restored prairie. We estimated SOC losses associated with land conversion and rates of change in SOC over time by regressing net change in SOC relative to a control against age since establishment year. Conversion of uncultivated land to biofuel agriculture resulted in significant SOC losses – an effect that was most pronounced when native land was converted to sugarcane agriculture. Corn residue harvest (at 25–100% removal) consistently resulted in SOC losses averaging 3–8 Mg ha−1 in the top 30 cm, whereas SOC accumulated under all four perennial grasses, with SOC accumulation rates averaging <1 Mg ha−1 yr−1 in the top 30 cm. More intensive harvests led to decreased C gains or increased C losses – an effect that was particularly clear for residue harvest in corn. Direct or indirect conversion of previously uncultivated land for biofuel agriculture will result in SOC losses that counteract the benefits of fossil fuel displacement. Additionally, SOC losses under corn residue harvest imply that its potential to offset C emissions may be overestimated, whereas SOC sequestration under perennial grasses represents an additional benefit that has rarely been accounted for in life cycle analyses of biofuels.

1 March 2009 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis
KAKristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
EDEvan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia

22 December 2009 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis
WPWilliam J. Parton
William J. Parton
FDFrank G. Dohleman
Frank G. Dohleman
CSCandice M. Smith
Candice M. Smith
SGStephen Del Grosso
Stephen Del Grosso
EDEvan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia

1 July 2011 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis
WPWilliam J Parton
William J Parton
SGStephen J Del Grosso
Stephen J Del Grosso
CKCindy Keough
Cindy Keough
EMErnest Marx
Ernest Marx
EDEvan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia
In the US, 95% of biofuel is produced from corn (Zea mays L), an intensively managed annual crop that is also grown for food and animal feed. Using the DAYCENT model, we estimated the effects on ecosystem services of replacing corn ethanol feedstocks with the perennial cellulosic feedstocks switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L) and miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter). If cellulosic feedstocks were planted on cropland that is currently used for ethanol production in the US, more ethanol (+82%) and grain for food (+4%) could be produced while at the same time reducing nitrogen leaching (−15 to −22%) and greenhouse‐gas (GHG) emissions (−29 to −473%). The GHG reduction was large even after accounting for emissions associated with indirect land‐use change. Conversion from a high‐input annual crop to a low‐input perennial crop for biofuel production can thus transition the central US from a net source to a net sink for GHGs.

21 November 2010 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis
FDFrank G. Dohleman
Frank G. Dohleman
SLStephen P. Long
Stephen P. Long

1 March 2008 in Geoforum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDawn C. Parker
Dawn C. Parker
AHAmy Hessl
Amy Hessl
SDSarah Davis
Sarah Davis