Background: Hip fractures are a prevalent and serious health issue, particularly among the elderly population aged >65 years. These injuries are associated with elevated rates of postoperative complications and mortality, significantly diminishing patients’ quality of life in both the short- and long-term. The prognosis for recovery is further exacerbated in individuals with signs of malnutrition. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of four distinct nutritional assessment scores in relation to postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip fractures at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Methods: This observational study included patients admitted to the Department of Traumatology at the Medical University for the surgical management of hip fractures between January 2019 and November 2021. Nutritional assessment scores were derived from a retrospective analysis of clinical data. The statistical correlation between nutritional scores and postoperative mortality outcomes was rigorously evaluated. Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.01) between all four nutritional scores and postoperative mortality risk. The malnourished cohorts demonstrated a markedly higher risk of mortality compared to those with adequate nutritional status, as indicated by the following risk ratios: Graz Malnutrition Screening (risk ratio = 2.53–1.68), Prognostic Nutritional Index (risk ratio = 2.44–1.74), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (risk ratio = 2.05–1.58), and Controlling Nutritional Status (risk ratio = 2.34–1.46). Despite these findings, the receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.68, indicating limited predictive power. Conclusions: Although a significant correlation existed between the evaluated nutritional scores and postoperative mortality, the predictive value of these scores was quantitatively low. No single nutritional assessment tool has emerged as a strong predictor of postoperative outcomes in this patient population. Consequently, implementation of any specific nutritional screening tool for standard assessment in patients with hip fractures is not recommended at this time. Nevertheless, given the established association between malnutrition and postoperative mortality, a comprehensive evaluation of nutritional status is advisable and further research is needed.

Background: Hip fractures are becoming a growing concern due to an aging population. The high costs to the healthcare system and far-reaching consequences for those affected, including a loss of independence and increased mortality rates, make this issue important. Poor nutritional status is a common problem among geriatric patients and is associated with a worse prognosis. Nutritional screening tools can help identify high-risk patients and enable individualized care to improve survival rates. Material and methods: This retrospective study investigates four nutritional scores and laboratory parameters’ predictive significance concerning postoperative mortality after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 month/s for patients over 60 years using the chi-square test, Cox regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines were used as part of the screening of the respective nutritional status of the patients, in particular to filter out malnutrition. Results: A total of 1080 patients were included in this study, whereas 8.05% suffered from malnutrition, defined as a body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 kg/m². The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) screening tool identified the highest proportion of malnourished patients at 14.54%. A total of 36.39% of patients were at risk of malnutrition according to three nutrition scores, with MNA providing the most significant proportion at 41.20%. Patients identified as malnourished had a higher mortality rate, and MNA screening was the only tool to show a significant correlation with postoperative mortality in all survey intervals. The MNA presented the best predictive significance among the screening tools, with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7 at 12 month postoperatively. Conclusions: MNA screening has a solid correlation and predictive significance regarding postoperative mortality—therefore routine implementation of this screening in orthopedic/traumatology wards is recommended. Moreover, nutritional substitution therapy can offer a relatively inexpensive and easy-to-implement measure. The Graz malnutrition screening (GMS) shows moderate predictive power and could be considered as an alternative for patients under 60 years of age. A higher albumin level is associated with improved survival probability, but cannot be indicative of nutritional status.

Early-onset dementia (EOD), with symptom onset before age 65, has a strong genetic burden. Due to genetic and clinical overlaps between different types of dementia, whole-exome sequencing (WES) has emerged as an appropriate screening method for diagnostic testing and novel gene-finding approaches. We performed WES and C9orf72 repeat testing in 60 well-defined Austrian EOD patients. Seven patients (12%) carried likely disease-causing variants in monogenic genes, PSEN1, MAPT, APP, and GRN. Five patients (8%) were APOE4 homozygote carriers. Definite and possible risk variants were detected in the genes TREM2, SORL1, ABCA7 and TBK1. In an explorative approach, we cross-checked rare gene variants in our cohort with a curated neurodegeneration candidate gene list and identified DCTN1, MAPK8IP3, LRRK2, VPS13C and BACE1 as promising candidate genes. Conclusively, 12 cases (20%) carried variants relevant to patient counseling, comparable to previously reported studies, and can thus be considered genetically resolved. Reduced penetrance, oligogenic inheritance and not yet identified high-risk genes might explain the high number of unresolved cases. To address this issue, we provide complete genetic and phenotypic information (uploaded to the European Genome-phenome Archive), enabling other researchers to cross-check variants. Thereby, we hope to increase the chance of independently finding the same gene/variant-hit in other well-defined EOD patient cohorts, thus confirming new genetic risk variants or variant combinations.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the treatment protocols of orthopedic and trauma departments, but its specific effect on the mortality of hip fracture patients due to possible delays in surgery remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic worsened the mortality of patients with hip fractures. Materials and methods: This study included 246 prospectively enrolled patients who suffered from hip fractures during the Austrian State of Emergency period between 1 March and 30 June 2020 and 2021 and were admitted to a tertiary care trauma center. This cohort was compared with a retrospective control group of 494 patients admitted for hip fractures during the same timeframe in 2017, 2018, and 2019. These groups were compared to a prospective recruited “post-COVID-19 collective consisting of the years 2022 and 2023 including 313 patients. Results: This study found a 22% reduction in admissions during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID period (p = 0.018), as well as significant changes in gender (p = 0.013) and place of accident (p = 0.049). No other changes in demographic variables were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.67% in the pre-COVID period, compared to 15.18% during the COVID-19 period (p = 0.381). No differences were observed in surgical complication rates or in the relationship between comorbidity burden and survival. Conclusion: This study did not show a higher perioperative mortality rate due to COVID-19. However, under current circumstances, with potentially reduced surgical and hospital bed capacities, it is expected that this condition might require a high degree of resources in times when resources are potentially scarce, such as during an ongoing pandemic. Level of evidence: Level III.

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries frequently result from trauma to the shoulder girdle and are particularly common among young, physically active individuals. These injuries account for approximately 9% of all traumatic shoulder girdle injuries and often lead to functional impairment and pain. The TightRope^® system, LARS™ band, and Bosworth screw are among over 160 currently described surgical techniques for managing ACJ dislocations. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach, particularly for the management of moderate Rockwood Type III ACJ dislocations. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 246 patients who underwent surgery for ACJ dislocation between 2010 and 2018 at the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, were analyzed. Patients were divided into four cohorts based on the surgical technique used: Bosworth screw, LARS (acute), LARS (chronic), and TightRope. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Constant, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California—Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), as well as radiographic analysis. Radiological measurements of the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) joint spaces were taken on both the injured and uninjured shoulders to analyze and compare the reduction in joint gaps. Results: All surgical methods resulted in significant reductions in AC and CC joint gaps. The TightRope and LARS acute groups showed the greatest reductions, with minimal complication rates. Complication analysis revealed significant differences in clavicular elevation (p < 0.001) and CC-ligament ossification (p = 0.006), which were most frequent in the Bosworth group and least common in TightRope^® patients, with LARS showing intermediate values. AC joint arthrosis was uncommon in all four groups and did not differ significantly (p = 0.13). Overall, TightRope^® was associated with the most favorable complication profile. The postoperative VAS score in the TightRope group was 1.52 ± 2.06, and the Constant score was 96.83 ± 5.41, reflecting high patient satisfaction. Conclusions: All systems led to satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes, with the LARS™ band showing particular effectiveness in chronic ACJ dislocations. While all techniques provided good results, the TightRope^® system demonstrated the most favorable overall profile in our cohort and may therefore be considered a promising contemporary option. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment for moderate ACJ dislocations and to assess the cost-effectiveness of these surgical techniques.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had an immense impact on the treatment protocols of orthopedic and trauma departments, yet its specific effect on mortality in patients with hip fractures due to possible surgical delays is still unclear. The purpose of this paper was to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic worsened the mortality rate of hip fracture patients. Patients and methods: This study comprised 175 prospectively included patients who (1) suffered from hip fractures, (2) presented during the Austrian state of emergency period from 15 March 2020 to 30 May 2021, and (3) were admitted to a level I trauma center. This cohort was compared with a retrospective control group of 339 patients admitted for hip fractures during the same timeframe in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Results: An admission reduction of 22% in the COVID period compared with the pre-COVID period was evident (p = 0.018). The 30-day mortality rate was 14.67% (pre-COVID) compared with 15.18% (p = 0.381). No differences in surgical complication rates or relationships between comorbidity burden and survival were observed. There were no significant changes in demographic variables, except for admission rate, gender (p = 0.013), and place of accident (p = 0.049). Conclusion: Surgeons should be reassured to take COVID-19 precautions, as this study did not show higher perioperative mortality due to COVID-19 measures. Under the current circumstances, with possibly reduced surgical and hospital bed capacities, it is expected that hip fractures may continue to require a high degree of resources.