Objective: Blood gas analysis plays an important role in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment of critically ill patients in the emergency department and the ICU. Historically, arterial blood is predominantly used for blood gas analysis. The puncture is painful and complications may occur. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous blood gas analysis and whether the sole use of venous blood gas analysis would have changed therapy. Methods: Adult patients who were intubated in the field and received an arterial and venous blood gas analysis within 15 mins after admission to the ED were eligible for inclusion. The values for pH, pCO₂, HCO₃-, base excess and lactate levels were collected retrospectively. Mean differences were calculated by subtracting venous from arterial values. The agreement between venous and arterial measurements was assessed using the method of Bland and Altman. Blood gases were assessed by two independent physicians using a standardized questionnaire to determine whether the use of venous blood gases would have led to a different interpretation of the situation (other diagnostic path) or a change of therapy (eg. respirator adjustment). Acceptable limits were defined before the collection of data started. Results: Fifty patients (62% male, median age 63years) who were treated at the Emergency Department between June 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were included in the study. Following average differences and limits of agreement (LOA) were documented: pH 0.02312 with LOA from −0.048 to 0.094; pCO₂ −3.612 mmHg with LOA from −15 to 8.1 mmHg; BE −0.154 mmol/l with LOA from −3.7 to 3.4 mmol/l; HCO₃−0.338 mmol/l with LOA from −2.27 to 2.9 mmol/l; Lactate −0.124 mg/dl with LOA from −2.28 to 2.03 mg/dl. Using venous blood gas results 100% of the patients with metabolic alkalosis were correctly diagnosed. Metabolic acidosis was detected with a high sensitivity (80.64%), specificity (89.47%) and positive predictive value (92.59%). The answers to lactate and acidosis due to AKI showed a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. The respiratory adjustment showed a high sensitivity (91.89%) but a low specificity (38.46%). Conclusion: For pH, bicarbonate, BE and lactate venous blood gases can be used as surrogates for arterial measurements. Venous pCO₂ can be used for screening of hypercapnia and trending. Respirator adjustments may be done too often if the venous blood gas is used.

Aim: Medication for the pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) is applied either in a fixed dose or adapted to body weight. Individual body weight might be a relevant confounder for anti-arrhythmic treatment success. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of body weight on pharmacological cardioversion success, comparing weight adapted (Vernakalant) and fixed dose (Ibutilide) pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion regimes. Methods: Within this prospective observational trial, a total of 316 episodes of AF and AFL were enrolled. Patients were stratified in either a Vernakalant (n = 181) or Ibutilide (n = 135) treatment arm, based on the chosen regime, for direct comparison of treatment efficacy. Results: Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 76.3% of all cases. Of note, there was no difference comparing the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms (Vernakalant 76.2% vs. Ibutilide 76.3%; p = 0.991). Within the whole study population, decreasing conversion rates with increasing body weight (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.69 (0.51–0.94); p = 0.018) were observed. An independent effect of body weight within the Ibutilide treatment arm was noted, which remained stable after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted OR = 0.55 (0.38–0.92), p = 0.022. Conclusion: Both, the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms showed comparable rates of treatment success in pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion of AF and AFL. Of utmost importance, we observed that the fixed dose of Ibutilide—as compared to the weight-adapted dose of Vernakalant—showed a reduced treatment success with increasing body weight.

Patients with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter constitute a rapidly growing cohort, but study-driven treatment recommendations are lacking. The present study aimed to compare the cardioversion success of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients with post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia. We included all episodes of post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with either intravenous ibutilide or amiodarone at an academic emergency department from 2010 to 2018. The primary endpoint was the conversion to sinus rhythm. The conversion rates were stratified by arrhythmia type, and multivariable cluster-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of ibutilide and amiodarone on cardioversion success, given as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 109 episodes of 72 patients were analyzed. The conversion rates were 37/49 (76%) for ibutilide and 16/60 (27%) for amiodarone. Compared to amiodarone, ibutilide was associated with higher odds of conversion (multivariable cluster-adjusted OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3–24.3). The cardioversion success of ibutilide was the highest in atrial flutter (crude OR 19.5, 95% CI 3.4–112.5) and focal atrial tachycardia (crude OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.5–47.2), but it was less pronounced in atrial fibrillation (crude OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2–17.2). Randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) could be a suitable method for acute exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) prior to cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) at the emergency department. Our aim was to present our experiences with this modality in recent years. Methods: This registry-based observational study was performed at the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. We studied all consecutive patients with AF and AFL who underwent CT between January 2012 and January 2023 to rule out LAAT before cardioversion to sinus rhythm was attempted. Follow-ups were conducted by telephone and electronic medical records. The main variables of interest were the rate of LAAT and ischemic stroke at follow-up. Results: A total of 234 patients (143 [61%] men; median age 68 years [IQR 57–76], median CHA₂DS₂-VASc 2 [IQR 1–4]) were analyzed. Follow-up was completed in 216 (92%) patients after a median of 506 (IQR 159–1391) days. LAAT was detected in eight patients (3%). A total of 163 patients (72%) in whom LAAT was excluded by CT were eventually successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm. No adverse events occurred during their ED stay. All patients received anticoagulation according to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk stratification, and no patient had suffered an ischemic stroke at follow-up, resulting in an incidence risk of ischemic strokes of 0% (95% CI 0.0–1.2%). Conclusion: LAAT was rare in patients admitted to the ED with AF and AFL who underwent cardiac CT prior to attempted cardioversion. At follow-up, no patient had suffered an ischemic stroke. Prospective studies need to show whether this strategy is suitable for the acute treatment of symptomatic AF in the emergency setting.

Background/Objectives: In recent years, awareness of sex disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) has grown, resulting in significant advancements in sex-specific treatment strategies. As these treatment approaches continue to evolve, it is essential to remain attentive to sex-related issues to ensure equitable care for all patients, a point first emphasised by the 2016 AF guidelines. Our objective was the long-term evaluation of sex-specific treatment standards for acute AF/AFL. Methods: This cohort study included cases of acute AF/AFL treated in the emergency department of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 2012 and 2022. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyse time-to-event data. The effect of sex on the time to restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed using the log-rank test for unadjusted models and the likelihood ratio test for adjusted models. The groups were categorised based on cases occurring before and after 2016. Results: A total of 3661 cases (55.7% male) were analysed. Before 2016, sinus rhythm was achieved in 70.8% of males and 71.2% of females; after 2016, these rates were 71.8% and 68.6%, respectively. The adjusted model showed a significant effect of sex on the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after 2016 (p = 0.013) but not before (p = 0.865). A subgroup analysis indicated similar results for pharmacologic rhythm control (p = 0.035 vs. p = 0.193). A sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, with similar effects in both models. The success rate of pharmacological cardioversion was lower in women than in men but was used more frequently in women after 2016. Conclusions: The re-emergence of a sex gap in success rates and time to restoration of sinus rhythm in emergency treatment for acute AF/AFL is concerning and necessitates a re-evaluation of treatment protocols, improved decision-making processes, and further research to ensure equitable, effective, and safe emergency care for all patients.

Background: Modern personalised medicine requires patient-tailored decisions. This is particularly important when considering pharmacological cardioversion for the acute treatment of haemodynamically stable atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a shared decision-making process. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to estimate the individual probability of successful pharmacological cardioversion using different intravenous antiarrhythmic agents. Methods: We analysed data from a prospective atrial fibrillation registry comprising 3053 cases of first-detected or recurrent haemodynamically stable, non-permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation presenting to an Austrian academic emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Using multivariable analysis, a prediction score was developed and externally validated. The clinical utility of the score was assessed using decision curve analysis. Results: A total of 1528 cases were included in the development cohort (median age 69 years, IQR 58–76; 43.9% female), and 1525 cases were included in the validation cohort (median age 68 years, IQR (58–75); 39.5% female). Finally, 421 cases were available for score development and 330 cases for score validation The weighted score included atrial flutter (8 points), duration of symptoms associated with AF (<24 h; 8 points), absence of previous electrical cardioversion (10 points), and the specific intravenous antiarrhythmic drug (amiodarone 10 points, vernakalant 11 points, ibutilide 13 points). The final score, the “Successful Intravenous Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation (SIC-AF) score,” showed good calibration (R² = 0.955 and R² = 0.954) and discrimination in both sets (c-indices: 0.68 and 0.66) and net clinical benefit. Conclusions: A predictive model was developed to estimate the success of intravenous pharmacological cardioversion using different antiarrhythmic agents in a cohort of patients with haemodynamically stable, non-permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation. External temporal validation confirmed good calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. The SIC-AF score may help patients and physicians jointly decide on the appropriate treatment strategy for acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Registration: NCT03272620.