Deanna Edwing

Ms. Deanna Edwing

University of Delaware, Newark, California, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSuna Lv
Suna Lv
Lingsheng MengLingsheng Meng
Lingsheng Meng
DEDeanna Edwing
Deanna Edwing
SXSihan Xue
Sihan Xue
Xupu GengXupu Geng
Xupu Geng
Xiao-Hai YanXiao-Hai Yan
Xiao-Hai Yan
Floods are the among the most frequent and common natural disasters, causing numerous casualties and extensive property losses worldwide every year. Since flooding areas are often accompanied by cloudy and rainy weather, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is one of the most powerful sensors for flood monitoring with capabilities of day-and-night and all-weather imaging. However, SAR images are prone to high speckle noise, shadows, and distortions, which affect the accuracy of water body segmentation. To address this issue, we propose a novel Modified DeepLabv3+ model based on the powerful extraction ability of convolutional neural networks for flood mapping from HISEA-1 SAR remote sensing images. Specifically, a lightweight encoder MobileNetv2 is used to improve floodwater detection efficiency, small jagged arrangement atrous convolutions are employed to capture features at small scales and improve pixel utilization, and more upsampling layers are utilized to refine the segmented boundaries of water bodies. The Modified DeepLabv3+ model is then used to analyze two severe flooding events in China and the United States. Results show that Modified DeepLabv3+ outperforms competing semantic segmentation models (SegNet, U-Net, and DeepLabv3+) with respect to the accuracy and efficiency of floodwater extraction. The modified model training resulted in average accuracy, F1, and mIoU scores of 95.74%, 89.31%, and 87.79%, respectively. Further analysis also revealed that Modified DeepLabv3+ is able to accurately distinguish water feature shape and boundary, despite complicated background conditions, while also retaining the highest efficiency by covering 1140 km2 in 5 min. These results demonstrate that this model is a valuable tool for flood monitoring and emergency management.

11 August 2023 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SXSihan Xue
Sihan Xue
Lingsheng MengLingsheng Meng
Lingsheng Meng
Xupu GengXupu Geng
Xupu Geng
HSHaiyang Sun
Haiyang Sun
DEDeanna Edwing
Deanna Edwing
Xiao-Hai YanXiao-Hai Yan
Xiao-Hai Yan
Sea surface winds and waves are very important phenomena that exist in the air–sea boundary layer. With the advent of climate change, cascade effects are bringing more attention to these phenomena as warmer sea surface temperatures bring about stronger winds, thereby altering global wave conditions. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a powerful sensor for high-resolution surface wind and wave observations and has accumulated large quantities of data. Furthermore, deep learning methods have been increasingly utilized in geoscience, especially the inversion of ocean information from SAR imagery. Here, we propose a method to invert various parameters of ocean surface winds and waves using Sentinel-1 SAR IW mode data. To ensure this method is more robust and scalable, we augmented the input data with dual-polarized SAR imagery, an incident angle, and a more constrained homogeneity test. This method adopts a deeper structure in order to retrieve more wind and wave parameters, and the use of residual networks can accelerate training convergence and improve regression accuracy. Using 1600 training samples filtered by a novel homogeneity test and with significant wave heights between 0 and 10 m, results from error parameters including the root mean square error (RMSE), scatter index (SI), and correlation coefficient (COR) show the great performance of this proposed method. The RMSE is 0.45 m, 0.76 s, and 1.90 m/s for the significant wave height, mean wave period, and wind speed, respectively. Furthermore, the temporal variation and spatial distribution of the estimates are consistent with China–France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observations, buoy measurements, WaveWatch3 regional model data, and ERA5 reanalysis data.