Cancer cachexia is a common condition in many cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Cancer cachexia patients are generally less tolerant to chemotherapies and radiotherapies, largely limiting their treatment options. While the search for treatments of this condition are ongoing, standards for the efficacy of treatments have yet to be developed. Current diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia are primarily based on loss of body mass and muscle function. However, these criteria are rather limiting, and in time, when weight loss is noticeable, it may be too late for treatment. Consequently, biomarkers for cancer cachexia would be valuable adjuncts to current diagnostic criteria, and for assessing potential treatments. Using high throughput methods such as “omics approaches”, a plethora of potential biomarkers have been identified. This article reviews and summarizes current studies of biomarkers for cancer cachexia.

Background: Developing therapies for cancer cachexia has not been successful to date, in part due to the challenges of achieving robust quantitative measures as a readout of patient treatment. Hence, identifying biomarkers to assess the outcomes of treatments for cancer cachexia is of great interest and important for accelerating future clinical trials. Methods: We established a novel xenograft model for cancer cachexia with a cachectic human PC3* cell line, which was responsive to anti-Fn14 mAb treatment. Using RNA-seq and secretomic analysis, genes differentially expressed in cachectic and non-cachectic tumors were identified and validated by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Correlation analysis was performed to investigate their impact on survival in cancer patients. Results: A total of 46 genes were highly expressed in cachectic PC3* tumors, which were downregulated by anti-Fn14 mAb treatment. High expression of the top 10 candidates was correlated with low survival and high cachexia risk in different cancer types. Elevated levels of LCN2 were observed in serum samples from cachectic patients compared with non-cachectic cancer patients. Conclusion: The top 10 candidates identified in this study are candidates as potential biomarkers for cancer cachexia. The diagnostic value of LCN2 in detecting cancer cachexia is confirmed in patient samples.