Roberta Salomone

Prof. Roberta Salomone

Department of Economics, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122 Messina ME, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Martin Calisto FriantMartin Calisto Friant
Martin Calisto Friant
WVWalter J.V. Vermeulen
Walter J.V. Vermeulen
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone

1 January 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone
GSG. Saija
G. Saija
GMGiovanni Mondello
Giovanni Mondello
AGA. Giannetto
A. Giannetto
SFS. Fasulo
S. Fasulo
DSD. Savastano
D. Savastano

1 June 2012 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone
GIGiuseppe Ioppolo
Giuseppe Ioppolo

1 November 2008 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone

18 June 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELErik Roos Lindgreen
Erik Roos Lindgreen
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone
TRTatiana Reyes
Tatiana Reyes
Transitioning from the current linear economic development model to a circular economy (CE) is a hot topic in academic literature, public governance, and the corporate domain. Actors have implemented CE strategies to reduce their resource use and its associated impacts, while boosting economic competitiveness and generating positive social impact. Companies are identified as key actors in transitioning to a CE, and many academics have proposed tools to assess CE and guide them in this process. This paper critically reviews such academic ‘assessment approaches’ at the micro level in order to reflect on their key properties. Seventy-four approaches are inventoried through a systematic literature review of academic literature. A critical review framework is constructed and applied, containing four perspectives: A general perspective, a descriptive perspective (methodological aspects), a normative perspective (connections to Sustainable Development), and a prescriptive perspective (implementation-focused). Methodologically, the 74 approaches are highly diverse, having various connections to previously established methodologies. Eighteen of the reviewed assessment approaches include all three dimensions of Sustainable Development (SD), in addition to a ‘circular’ dimension. Roughly one quarter of the approaches apply a participatory design approach. Suggested key desired properties of CE assessment approaches include making use of existing assessment methodologies such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and a closer collaboration between science and practitioners to consider end-user needs in the design of CE assessment approaches.

19 February 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppe IoppoloGiuseppe Ioppolo
Giuseppe Ioppolo
SCStefano Cucurachi
Stefano Cucurachi
Roberta SalomoneRoberta Salomone
Roberta Salomone
GSGiuseppe Saija
Giuseppe Saija
LSLei Shi
Lei Shi
The emphasis on learning and adaptation among different actors at various political administrative levels and on various geographic scales has become a precondition for the emergence of sustainable development. It is possible to find the essential form of collaborative management by using a Strategic Plan, designed to determine a local model of sustainable competitiveness in economic, social and environmental terms. The adoption of a Strategic Plan stimulates a process of shared knowledge, through which it is possible to generate a new environmental governance (EG) that is truly representative of a local system. This paper presents, as a case study representative of the Italian context, the Strategic Plan of the Nebrodi area (SP), and assesses the structure of a new form of public and private environmental governance focused on sustainable concern. Finally, the SP could be considered a guideline for managing the local territorial and environmental system from a long-term perspective.