Objective: Huddles are short, regular debriefings that are designed to provide frontline staff and bedside caregivers environments to share problems and identify solutions. Daily huddle implementation could improve medical safety work, problem identification and improvement, situation awareness and teamwork enhancement, the collaboration and communication between professionals and departments, and patient safety. This study aimed evaluated the effectiveness of a hospital-based huddle at a general medical ward in Taiwan. Methods: A Continuous Integration team was conducted by combining multidisciplinary frontline staff to huddle at a 74-bed general medical ward. Team Huddles started twice a week. A physical huddle run board was created, which contained four parts, including idea submitted, idea approved, working on an idea and standardizing. Problems were submitted to the board to be identified, and the solutions were evaluated through huddle discussion. We divided the problems into two groups: quick hits (resolved within 24– 48hrs) and complex issues (resolved > 48hrs). An anonymous questionnaire was designed to evaluate the huddle response. Results: A total of 44 huddles occurred from September 9th, 2020, to September 30th, 2021, and 81 issues were identified and resolved. The majority issues were policy documentation (n=23; 28.4%). Sixty-seven (82.7%) issues were defined as quick hits, and the other fourteen (17.3%) issues were complex. The mean hours to the resolution of quick hits was 5.17 hours, median 3.5 hours, and range from 0.01– 15.4 hours. The mean days to resolve completion issues were 19.73 days, median 7.5 days, and range 3.57– 26.14 days. An overwhelming 92.9% of staff responded that huddles help to expedite the process to reach treatment goals, reduce clinical mistakes, near misses, reduce patient incidences, and help teamwork enhancement, with rating of 4.52 (on a 5-point Likert scale). Conclusion: Implementing of multidisciplinary team huddle improved the accountability of issue identification, problem-solving and teamwork enhancement.

(1) Background: We aimed to evaluate hearing benefits from hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy in patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSHL). (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of chart reviews on patients with ISSHL between Jan 2016 and Dec 2021. All patients were referred to receive HBO therapy by the department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT). Hearing gain was assessed based on pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Data were analyzed for 102 patients after 1 to 5 therapy sessions, and for 46 patients after 6 to 10 therapy sessions. (3) Results: After 1–5 HBO sessions, patients (N = 102) showed an improvement in 45 (44.1%) of the patients (p < 0.000). Also, improvements were found with patients showing different grades of ISSHL: 11 (26.8%) with slight-moderate, 11 (40.7%) with severe, and 23 (67.6%) with profound ISSHL. Significant treatment effects were found at different affected frequencies, especially the low frequency range. After 6–10 HBO sessions, patients (N = 46) showed similar treatment effects as after 1–5 HBO sessions, but no additional improvement. Moreover, patients who received HBO treatment within 12 days showed improvement effects 6.484 times greater (p < 0.000) compared with those who received treatment after 13 days. (4) Conclusions: The improvement of HBO therapy on ISSHL was significant after 1–5 sessions, with larger improvements for those suffering more serious symptoms. Further adding more HBO treatment sessions to 6–10, no further improvement was found. Patients starting HBO therapy within 12 days of ISSHL showed 6.484 times greater improvements compared with those starting HBO therapy later.

The implications of boosting Omalizumab treatment (OT) in patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA) remain unclear. The study aimed to explore and compare the 12-month effectiveness between continuous, at least 10-month OT (continuation group) and four-month boost of Omalizumab (boost group) in adult patients with SAA. In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data were collected for further analysis. Of all participants (n = 124), a significant reduction in annual exacerbations (baseline = 0.8 ± 1.5, follow-up = 0.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.047 *) and improvement in small airway ventilation as evaluated by forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (baseline = 55.1 ± 11.1%, follow-up = 59.4 ± 8.4%, p < 0.001 *) were found in the continuation group (n = 110). By contrast, the boost group (n = 14) had significantly increased annual exacerbations (baseline = 0.7 ± 1.4, follow-up = 2.9 ± 3.6, p = 0.031 *) and impaired small airway function (baseline = 55.3 ± 12.9, follow-up = 52.1 ± 12.5, p = 0.026 *). Furthermore, the continuation group rather than the boost group had significant decreases in the frequency of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use as controllers (baseline = 32.7%, follow-up = 20.0%, p = 0.047 *; baseline = 50.0%, follow-up = 21.4%, p = 0.237, respectively) and OCS maintenance dose (mg/month) (baseline = 85.9 ± 180.8, follow-up = 45.8 ± 106.6, p = 0.020 *; baseline = 171.4 ± 221.5, follow-up = 50.0 ± 104.3, p = 0.064, respectively), and increases in asthma control test scores (baseline = 16.0 ± 3.0, follow-up = 19.8 ± 4.4, p < 0.001 *; baseline = 14.6 ± 3.8, follow-up = 19.7 ± 4.7, p = 0.050, respectively). Continuous OT would be beneficial for adult patients with SAA, while boost of Omalizumab would worsen their long-term outcomes.

Objective: A huddle is a short, regular meetings to discuss existing or emerging patient safety issues. Hospital administrators can encourage healthcare staff to voluntarily examine the potential occurrence and severity of risks, thereby enhancing awareness of patient safety. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of huddle intervention on patient safety culture among medical team members and related factors. Methods: We used a one-group pretest-posttest research design and convenience sampled 109 members of the general internal medicine ward team members from a medical center in central Taiwan. They participated 2 times per week in 15-min huddles from 08:15 to 08:30 in the morning, which lasted for a total of 4 weeks. The process was based on submitted ideas, approved ideas, research ideas and standardization, and data on the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) were collected during the huddles’ intervention pretest and posttest. Results: After the huddle intervention, we found significantly improved scores for safety attitude, teamwork climate (76.49± 16.13 vs 83.26± 13.39, p < 0.001), safety climate (75.07± 16.07 vs 82.63± 13.72, p < 0.001), job satisfaction (73.67± 19.84 vs 83.39± 17.21, p < 0.001), perceptions of management (77.87± 19.99 vs 84.86± 16.03, p < 0.001) and working conditions (78.96± 18.16 vs 86.18± 14.90, p < 0.001). Correlation analyses on the differences between pretest and posttest showed that age had a significant correlation with safety climate (r = 0.22, p = 0.022) and working conditions (r = 0.20, p = 0.035). The number of times to participate in a huddle had a significant correlation with teamwork climate (r = 0.33, p =< .001), safety climate (r = 0.30, p = 0.002), job satisfaction (r = 0.19, p = 0.043), and work conditions (r = 0.28, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Huddles improve clinical team members’ understanding of different dimensions and relate factors of safety attitudes. Implementation of the huddles involved standardized process will help hospital administrators understand the steps to parallel expansion to other wards.

Background/Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hearing gain using hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy on patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL), and to provide recommendations with reference to treatment session, intervention time and the impairment severity. Methods: In this retrospective chart-review study, we analyzed data of ISSHL patients referred to us from the department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) between January 2016 and December 2024. Hearing sensitivity improvements were assessed using pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Results: We found that 50.7% of patients (n = 148) had improved after 5 HBO sessions and 47.7% (n = 107) had improved after 10 HBO sessions. While no difference was found between different treatment cycles, we found treatment effects varied significantly depending on disease severity. Specifically, 64.3% of patients with profound ISSHL had improved (p = 0.010) after 5 sessions, and 69.2% (p = 0.002) after 10 sessions. Such improvements in patients with profound ISSHL were 3.681-fold larger than in those with mild to moderate ISSHL. In addition, patients who had received HBO therapy within 12 days of diagnosis showed the best response, with an odds ratio (OR) of 7.768 (95% CI: 2.785–21.664) (p = 0.000 *); those receiving HBO between 13 and 27 days had an OR of 3.974 (95% CI: 1.243–12.702), (p = 0.020 *); both groups were compared with those receiving HBO after 27 days. Conclusions: Patients with more severe ISSHL showed greater improvement with HBO therapy. Also, patients who started HBO therapy earlier showed better response; those who started later, like after 27 days, showed poorer or even no response at all.