Aims: Peri-procedural transcatheter valve embolization and migration (TVEM) is a rare but potentially devastating complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to assess the incidence, causes, and outcome of TVEM in a large multicentre cohort. Methods and results: We recorded cases of peri-procedural TVEM in patients undergoing TAVI between January 2010 and December 2017 from 26 international sites. Peri-procedural TVEM occurred in 273/29 636 (0.92%) TAVI cases (age 80.8 ± 7.3 years; 53.8% female), of which 217 were to the ascending aorta and 56 to the left ventricle. The use of self-expanding or first-generation prostheses and presence of a bicuspid aortic valve were independent predictors of TVEM. Bail-out measures included repositioning attempts using snares or miscellaneous tools (41.0%), multiple valve implantations (83.2%), and conversion to surgery (19.0%). Using 1:4-propensity matching, we identified a cohort of 235 patients with TVEM (TVEMPS) and 932 patients without TVEM (non-TVEMPS). In the matched cohort, all-cause mortality was higher in TVEMPS than in non-TVEMPS at 30 days (18.6% vs. 4.9%; P < 0.001) and after 1 year (30.5% vs. 16.6%; P < 0.001). Major stroke was more frequent in TVEMPS at 30 days (10.6% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.001), but not at 1 year (4.6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.17). The need for emergent cardiopulmonary support, major stroke at 30 days, and acute kidney injury Stages 2 and 3 increased the risk of 1-year mortality, whereas a better renal function at baseline was protective. Conclusion: Transcatheter valve embolization and migration occurred in approximately 1% and was associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration, aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed. There are no data on long-term outcomes after aortic ViV. Our aim was to perform a large-scale assessment of long-term survival and reintervention after aortic ViV. A total of 1006 aortic ViV procedures performed more than 5 years ago [mean age 77.7 ± 9.7 years; 58.8% male; median STS-PROM score 7.3% (4.2–12.0)] were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with Medtronic self-expandable valves (CoreValve/Evolut, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (n = 523, 52.0%), Edwards balloon-expandable valves (EBEV, SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT/SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (n = 435, 43.2%), and other devices (n = 48, 4.8%). Survival was lower at 8 years in patients with small-failed bioprostheses [internal diameter (ID) ≤ 20 mm] compared with those with large-failed bioprostheses (ID > 20 mm) (33.2% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.01). Independent correlates for mortality included smaller-failed bioprosthetic valves [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.13)], age [HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01–1.45)], and non-transfemoral access [HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11–1.84)]. There were 40 reinterventions after ViV. Independent correlates for all-cause reintervention included pre-existing severe prosthesis–patient mismatch [subhazard ratio (SHR) 4.34 (95% CI 1.31–14.39)], device malposition [SHR 3.75 (95% CI 1.36–10.35)], EBEV [SHR 3.34 (95% CI 1.26–8.85)], and age [SHR 0.59 (95% CI 0.44–0.78)]. The size of the original failed valve may influence long-term mortality, and the type of the transcatheter valve may influence the need for reintervention after aortic ViV.

The objective of this study was to identify electrocardiographic (ECG) and further predictors for atrioventricular (AV) block with a need for pacemaker (PM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Pre- and post-procedural ECGs of patients with severe aortic stenosis and ongoing TAVI were investigated in a prospective study. From 50 consecutive patients enrolled in the study (mean age 80 ± 6 years, 46% men), 17 (34%) experienced an AV block with subsequent requirement of a permanent PM [16 of 36 (44.4%) with CoreValve System and 1 of 14 (7.1%) with Edwards Sapiens System]. In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), PM implantation had to be performed more frequently [6 of 6 (100%) with CoreValve System and none with Edwards Sapiens System], P = 0.005. An AV block (Mobitz II second degree and third degree) occurred mostly within the first 24 h (range: Days 0–13) after the index procedure. No recovery of AV conduction with a change in PM indication occurred in a mean follow-up time of 13 ± 6 days. Our data demonstrate that patients with pre-operative RBBB and those receiving CoreValve prosthesis are at a significantly higher risk for PM implantation after TAVI. Therefore, patients with the presence of RBBB before TAVI may be at lower risk for PM implantation using the Edwards Sapiens System.

The SAVI-TF (Symetis ACURATE neo Valve Implantation Using Transfemoral Access) registry was initiated to study the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve in a large patient population treated under real-world conditions. The self-expanding, supra-annular ACURATE neo prosthesis is a transcatheter heart valve that gained the Conformité Européene mark in 2014, but only limited clinical data are available so far. This prospective, multicenter registry enrolled 1,000 patients at 25 European centers who were followed for 1 year post-procedure. Mean patient age was 81.1 ± 5.2 years; mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation I score, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 18.1 ± 12.5%, 6.6 ± 7.5%, and 6.0 ± 5.6%, respectively. At 1 year, 8.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3% to 9.7%) of patients had died, 2.3% (95% CI: 1.3% to 3.2%) had disabling strokes, and 9.9% (95% CI: 8.1% to 11.8%) had permanent pacemaker implantations. Through 1 year, 5 reinterventions (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.1% to 1.0%) were performed: 3 valve-in-valve and 2 surgical aortic valve replacements. Mean effective orifice area was 1.84 ± 0.43 cm2, mean gradient was 7.3 ± 3.7 mm Hg, and greater than mild paravalvular leakage was observed in 3.6% of patients. Transfemoral implantation of the ACURATE neo prosthesis resulted in favorable 1-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with very low mortality and new pacemaker rates.