Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the lack of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and lacks HER2 overexpression or gene amplification. It accounts for 10–15% of incident breast cancers and carries the worst prognosis. TNBC is overrepresented among Black and pre-menopausal women and is associated with significant psychological and treatment-related burdens, including financial toxicity. Like other breast cancers, TNBC is biologically heterogeneous, leading to diverse clinical and epidemiological behaviors, however, unlike the other clinical subtypes, in TNBC we still lack tumor-specific targeted therapy. Early TNBC outcomes have improved due to the intensification of therapies, including improvements in polychemotherapy and the addition of immunotherapy. Future efforts are needed to identify targetable aberrations for specific drug therapy, prevent immune evasion, and increase social-economic support. Given that the name TNBC illustrates its lack of specifically targeted and effective therapy, we look forward to being able to retire the name in favor of a group of targetable entities within what is now called “TNBC”.

The Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) is an assay for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer with extensively validated predictive and prognostic value. However, its cost and lag time have limited global adoption, and previous attempts to estimate it using clinicopathologic variables have had limited success. To address this, we assembled 6172 cases across three institutions and developed Orpheus, a multimodal deep learning tool to infer the RS from H&E whole-slide images. Our model identifies TAILORx high-risk cases (RS > 25) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89, compared to a leading clinicopathologic nomogram with 0.73. Furthermore, in patients with RS ≤ 25, Orpheus ascertains risk of metastatic recurrence more accurately than the RS itself (0.75 vs 0.49 mean time-dependent AUC). These findings have the potential to guide adjuvant therapy for high-risk cases and tailor surveillance for patients at elevated metastatic recurrence risk.

Cardiotoxicity encompasses a spectrum of adverse cardiological effects experienced by cancer patients during and after receiving antineoplastic treatments. The intersection of cancer care with the management of the multiple comorbid non-communicable diseases carried by patients or related to cancer treatments motivates the need for an integrated and multidisciplinary approach to therapeutic clinical decision-making. This present review aimed to provide a perspective and an update of the current pharmacotherapy approaches for the prevention and management of cardiotoxicity from antiblastic chemotherapy; as such, it addresses myocardial, vascular, and arrhythmic disorders associated to chemotherapy, by navigating the current knowledge and clinical indications in support of the medical interventions. Clinical scenarios of pharmacological interventions take place with patients receiving anthracycline and, by extrapolation, other agents with cardiotoxic potentials and non-chemotherapy agents, including various small molecules and immunotherapy agents. Analysis of these scenarios aims to provide practical evidence-based guidance for the management of drug-induced cardiac dysfunctions. The possible role of new biomarkers for the early recognition of cardiotoxicity is mentioned across the clinical studies, with reference to the pharmacological biomarker-driven interventions delivered. To best inform survivorship care, the management and context of cardio-oncology services are discussed within the broader network of providers and settings of care.

PURPOSE: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is approved for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We report the real-world clinical effectiveness and toxicity data of SG in patients with mTNBC. METHODS: A multi-institution retrospective study of patients with mTNBC treated with SG from January 2021 to May 2023 was conducted. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included. The median age at SG initiation was 60 years (range, 31-85). All patients were female; 73 (63.5%) were White and 31 (27.0%) were Black. The median number of previous therapies in the metastatic setting was two (range, 0-8). Sixty-one (56.0%) patients had primary refractory disease. Median relative dose intensity was 92% (range, 33%-100%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were seen in 50.9% of patients, which included neutropenia (35.7%), anemia (27.0%), vomiting (16.5%), fatigue (8.7%), and diarrhea (7.0%). Dose reductions and treatment discontinuation due to AEs were required in 51.3% and 13.2%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 27.8%. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 12.9) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 5.9). In patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–low mTNBC who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) after SG, the ORR to T-DXd was 34.8% and median PFS was 7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 10.1). CONCLUSION: In a real-world cohort of heavily pretreated patients with mTNBC, SG retains its clinical activity. In a subgroup with HER2-low disease, T-DXd continues to demonstrate promising clinical activity after SG, supporting the use of sequential antibody-drug conjugates in this population.

Purpose of review: Growth and survival of hormone receptor positive breast cancer cells are dependent on circulating hormones (e.g., estrogen and progesterone). Endocrine therapy improved outcomes in both early and advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer. These treatments include drugs with different mechanisms of action, namely selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM), aromatase inhibitors, and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). SERDs represent estrogen receptor antagonists, favoring its degradation and thus interfering with proliferation genes transcription and activation. Fulvestrant is the first approved SERD, administered intramuscularly for treating advanced breast cancer. Recent findings: Oral SERDs have been tested to overcome the limitation of the intramuscular administration, and to increase SERD bioavailability. Recently, an oral SERD, Elacestrant, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients carrying an ESR1 mutation. In fact, oral SERDs seem to be effective in tumors harboring ESR1 mutations, a well known mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy (especially aromatase inhibitors). Summary: More recently, oral SERDs have been tested in patients with early hormone receptor positive breast cancer, although their impact on survival and in this curative setting compared to standard endocrine therapy still needs to be elucidated. The best timing and duration of SERD administration and specific biomarkers in (neo)adjuvant setting remain largely unknown.