Edwin van Leeuwen

Dr. Edwin van Leeuwen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 June 2014 in Animal Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
KCKatherine A. Cronin
Katherine A. Cronin
DHDaniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun

25 May 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
ECEmma Cohen
Emma Cohen
ECEmma Collier-Baker
Emma Collier-Baker
CRChristian J. Rapold
Christian J. Rapold
MSMarie Schäfer
Marie Schäfer
DHDaniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun
Social information use is a pivotal characteristic of the human species. Avoiding the cost of individual exploration, social learning confers substantial fitness benefits under a wide variety of environmental conditions, especially when the process is governed by biases toward relative superiority (e.g., experts, the majority). Here, we examine the development of social information use in children aged 4–14 years (n = 605) across seven societies in a standardised social learning task. We measured two key aspects of social information use: general reliance on social information and majority preference. We show that the extent to which children rely on social information depends on children’s cultural background. The extent of children’s majority preference also varies cross-culturally, but in contrast to social information use, the ontogeny of majority preference follows a U-shaped trajectory across all societies. Our results demonstrate both cultural continuity and diversity in the realm of human social learning.

5 November 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
Katherine CroninKatherine Cronin
Katherine Cronin
DHDaniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun
Understanding intraspecific variation in sociality is essential for characterizing the flexibility and evolution of social systems, yet its study in nonhuman animals is rare. Here, we investigated whether chimpanzees exhibit population-level differences in sociality that cannot be easily explained by differences in genetics or ecology. We compared social proximity and grooming tendencies across four semiwild populations of chimpanzees living in the same ecological environment over three consecutive years, using both linear mixed models and social network analysis. Results indicated temporally stable, population-level differences in dyadic-level sociality. Moreover, group cohesion measures capturing network characteristics beyond dyadic interactions (clustering, modularity, and social differentiation) showed population-level differences consistent with the dyadic indices. Subsequently, we explored whether the observed intraspecific variation in sociality could be attributed to cultural processes by ruling out alternative sources of variation including the influences of ecology, genetics, and differences in population demographics. We conclude that substantial variation in social behavior exists across neighboring populations of chimpanzees and that this variation is in part shaped by cultural processes.

6 March 2024 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
SDSarah E. DeTroy
Sarah E. DeTroy
DHDaniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun
JCJosep Call
Josep Call
Cumulative cultural evolution has been claimed to be a uniquely human phenomenon pivotal to the biological success of our species. One plausible condition for cumulative cultural evolution to emerge is individuals’ ability to use social learning to acquire know-how that they cannot easily innovate by themselves. It has been suggested that chimpanzees may be capable of such know-how social learning, but this assertion remains largely untested. Here we show that chimpanzees use social learning to acquire a skill that they failed to independently innovate. By teaching chimpanzees how to solve a sequential task (one chimpanzee in each of the two tested groups, n = 66) and using network-based diffusion analysis, we found that 14 naive chimpanzees learned to operate a puzzle box that they failed to operate during the preceding three months of exposure to all necessary materials. In conjunction, we present evidence for the hypothesis that social learning in chimpanzees is necessary and sufficient to acquire a new, complex skill after the initial innovation.

9 May 2016 in American Journal of Primatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
IMInnocent Chitalu Mulenga
Innocent Chitalu Mulenga
MBMark D. Bodamer
Mark D. Bodamer
KCKatherine A. Cronin
Katherine A. Cronin

13 March 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEdwin van Leeuwen
Edwin van Leeuwen
KCKatherine A. Cronin
Katherine A. Cronin
DHDaniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun
For the first time, chimpanzees have been observed using tools to clean the corpse of a deceased group member. A female chimpanzee sat down at the dead body of a young male, selected a firm stem of grass, and started to intently remove debris from his teeth. This report contributes novel behaviour to the chimpanzee’s ethogram, and highlights how crucial information for reconstructing the evolutionary origins of human mortuary practices may be missed by refraining from developing adequate observation techniques to capture non-human animals’ death responses.