CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using generative adversarial networks with disentangled representation Jiwei Liu, Hui Yan, Hanlin Cheng, Jianfei Liu, Pengjian Sun, Boyi Wang, Ronghu Mao, Chi Du, Shengquan Luo

Background: Deformable image registration (DIR) is increasingly used for target volume definition in radiotherapy. However, this method is challenging for postoperative breast cancer patients due to the large deformations and non-correspondence caused by tumor resection and clip insertion. In this study, an improved B-splines based DIR method was developed to address this issue for higher registration accuracy. Methods: The conventional B-splines based DIR method was improved with the introduction of point metric and masking technique. The point metric minimizes the distance between 2 point sets with known correspondence for regularization of intensity-based B-splines registration. The masking technique reduces the influence of non-corresponding regions in breast computed tomography (CT) images. Two sets of CT images before and after breast surgery were used for image registration. One set was the diagnostic CT image acquired before surgery, and another set was the planning CT image acquired after surgery for breast cancer radiotherapy. A total of 26 sets of CT images from 13 patients were collected retrospectively for the test. The improved DIR method’s registration accuracy was evaluated by target registration error (TRE), the Jacobian determinant, and visual assessment. Results: For soft tissue, the difference in the median TRE between the improved DIR method and the conventional DIR method was statistically significant (2.27 vs. 5.88, P<0.05). The Jacobian determinant of the deformation field was positive for all patients. For visual assessment, the improved DIR method with point metric achieved better matching for soft tissue. Conclusions: The improved DIR method’s registration accuracy was higher than the conventional DIR method based on the preliminary results. With point metric and masking technique, the influence of large deformations and non-correspondence on registration between pre- and post-operative CT images can be effectively reduced. Therefore, this method provides a feasible way for target volume definition in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is widely used in clinical practice. It not only significantly reduces treatment time, but also produces high-quality treatment plans. Current optimization approaches heavily rely on stochastic algorithms which are time-consuming and less repeatable. In this study, a novel approach is proposed to provide a high-efficient optimization algorithm for VMAT treatment planning. A progressive sampling strategy is employed for beam arrangement of VMAT planning. The initial beams with equal-space are added to the plan in a coarse sampling resolution. Fluence-map optimization and leaf-sequencing are performed for these beams. Then, the coefficients of fluence-maps optimization algorithm are adjusted according to the known fluence maps of these beams. In the next round the sampling resolution is doubled and more beams are added. This process continues until the total number of beams arrived. The performance of VMAT optimization algorithm was evaluated using three clinical cases and compared to those of a commercial planning system. The dosimetric quality of VMAT plans is equal to or better than the corresponding IMRT plans for three clinical cases. The maximum dose to critical organs is reduced considerably for VMAT plans comparing to those of IMRT plans, especially in the head and neck case. The total number of segments and monitor units are reduced for VMAT plans. For three clinical cases, VMAT optimization takes < 5 min accomplished using proposed approach and is 3–4 times less than that of the commercial system. The proposed VMAT optimization algorithm is able to produce high-quality VMAT plans efficiently and consistently. It presents a new way to accelerate current optimization process of VMAT planning.

Prior information guided auto-contouring of breast gland for deformable image registration in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy Xin Xie, Yuchun Song, Feng Ye, Hui Yan, Shulian Wang, Xinming Zhao, Jianrong Dai

Utilizing pre-determined beam orientation information in dose prediction by 3D fully-connected network for intensity modulated radiotherapy Hui Yan, Shoulin Liu, Jingjing Zhang, Jianfei Liu, Teng Li

(1) Purpose: Challenges remain in dose accumulation for cervical cancer radiotherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) as there are many large and complex organ deformations between different treatments. This study aims to improve deformable image registration (DIR) accuracy with the introduction of multi-metric objectives for dose accumulation of EBRT and BT. (2) Materials and methods: Twenty cervical cancer patients treated with EBRT (45–50 Gy/25 fractions) and high-dose-rate BT (≥20 Gy in 4 fractions) were included for DIR. The multi-metric DIR algorithm included an intensity-based metric, three contour-based metrics, and a penalty term. Nonrigid B-spine transformation was used to transform the planning CT images from EBRT to the first BT, with a six-level resolution registration strategy. To evaluate its performance, the multi-metric DIR was compared with a hybrid DIR provided by commercial software. The DIR accuracy was measured by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) between deformed and reference organ contours. The accumulated maximum dose of 2 cc (D_2cc) of the bladder and rectum was calculated and compared to simply addition of D_2cc from EBRT and BT (ΔD_2cc). (3) Results: The mean DSC of all organ contours for the multi-metric DIR were significantly higher than those for the hybrid DIR (p ≤ 0.011). In total, 70% of patients had DSC > 0.8 using the multi-metric DIR, while 15% of patients had DSC > 0.8 using the commercial hybrid DIR. The mean ΔD_2cc of the bladder and rectum for the multi-metric DIR were 3.25 ± 2.29 and 3.54 ± 2.02 Gy_EQD2, respectively, whereas those for the hybrid DIR were 2.68 ± 2.56 and 2.32 ± 3.25 Gy_EQD2, respectively. The multi-metric DIR resulted in a much lower proportion of unrealistic D_2cc than the hybrid DIR (2.5% vs. 17.5%). (4) Conclusions: Compared with the commercial hybrid DIR, the introduced multi-metric DIR significantly improved the registration accuracy and resulted in a more reasonable accumulated dose distribution.