Probiotics have several health benefits by modulating gut microbiome; however, techno-functional limitations such as viability controls have hampered their full potential applications in the food and pharmaceutical sectors. Therefore, the focus is gradually shifting from viable probiotic bacteria towards non-viable paraprobiotics and/or probiotics derived biomolecules, so-called postbiotics. Paraprobiotics and postbiotics are the emerging concepts in the functional foods field because they impart an array of health-promoting properties. Although, these terms are not well defined, however, for time being these terms have been defined as here. The postbiotics are the complex mixture of metabolic products secreted by probiotics in cell-free supernatants such as enzymes, secreted proteins, short chain fatty acids, vitamins, secreted biosurfactants, amino acids, peptides, organic acids, etc. While, the paraprobiotics are the inactivated microbial cells of probiotics (intact or ruptured containing cell components such as peptidoglycans, teichoic acids, surface proteins, etc.) or crude cell extracts (i.e. with complex chemical composition)”. However, in many instances postbiotics have been used for whole category of postbiotics and parabiotics. These elicit several advantages over probiotics like; (i) availability in their pure form, (ii) ease in production and storage, (iii) availability of production process for industrial-scale-up, (iv) specific mechanism of action, (v) better accessibility of Microbes Associated Molecular Pattern (MAMP) during recognition and interaction with Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRR) and (vi) more likely to trigger only the targeted responses by specific ligand-receptor interactions. The current review comprehensively summarizes and discussed various methodologies implied to extract, purify, and identification of paraprobiotic and postbiotic compounds and their potential health benefits.

Probiotics are amply studied and applied dietary supplements of greater consumer acceptance. Nevertheless, the emerging evidence on probiotics-mediated potential risks, especially among immunocompromised individuals, necessitates careful and in-depth safety studies. The traditional probiotic safety evaluation methods investigate targeted phenotypic traits, such as virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. However, the rapid innovation in omics technologies has offered an impactful means to ultimately sequence and unknot safety-related genes or their gene products at preliminary levels. Further validating the genome features using an array of phenotypic tests would provide an absolute realization of gene expression dynamics. For safety studies in animal models, the in vivo toxicity evaluation guidelines of chemicals proposed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have been meticulously adopted in probiotic research. Future research should also focus on coupling genome-scale safety analysis and establishing a link to its transcriptome, proteome, or metabolome for a fine selection of safe probiotic strains. Considering the studies published over the years, it can be inferred that the safety of probiotics is strain-host-dose-specific. Taken together, an amalgamation of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches are necessary for a fine scale selection of risk-free probiotic strain for use in human applications.