Francesca Margherita Bunino

Dr. Francesca Margherita Bunino

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CFCaterina Foppa
Caterina Foppa
AMAnnalisa Maroli
Annalisa Maroli
SLSara Lauricella
Sara Lauricella
ALAntonio Luberto
Antonio Luberto
CRCarlotta La Raja
Carlotta La Raja
ASAntonino Spinelli
Antonino Spinelli
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset CRC-EOCRC). Recent studies highlighted the biological and clinical differences between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC-age ≥ 50), while comparative results about long-term survival are still debated. This study aimed to investigate whether age of onset may impact on oncologic outcomes in a surgical population of sporadic CRC patients. Patients operated on for sporadic CRC from January 2010 to January 2022 were allocated to the EOCRC and LOCRC groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence/progression-free survival (R/PFS). A total of 423 EOCRC and 1650 LOCRC was included. EOCRC had a worse R/PFS (p < 0.0001) and cancer specific survival (p < 0.0001) compared with LOCRC. At Cox regression analysis, age of onset, tumoral stage, signet ring cells, extramural/lymphovascular/perineural veins invasion, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for R/P. The analysis by tumoral stage showed an increased incidence of recurrence in stage I EOCRC (p = 0.014), and early age of onset was an independent predictor for recurrence (p = 0.035). Early age of onset was an independent predictor for worse prognosis, this effect was stronger in stage I patients suggesting a potentially—and still unknown—more aggressive tumoral phenotype in EOCRC.

27 January 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSimone Famularo
Simone Famularo
FMFlavio Milana
Flavio Milana
Matteo Maria CiminoMatteo Maria Cimino
Matteo Maria Cimino
FPFabio Procopio
Fabio Procopio
GCGuido Costa
Guido Costa
Guido TorzilliGuido Torzilli
Guido Torzilli
Disease progression (PD) at neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) is considered a contraindication to hepatic resection. Our aim was to estimate the overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgery compared with those treated exclusively with chemotherapy in cases of PD. Patients from a single centre with PD were analyzed and subdivided into two groups: hepatectomy (HEP) versus chemotherapy (CHT). An Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) was run to balance the baseline differences between the two groups. A Cox regression was carried out on identifying factors predicting mortality. From 2010 to 2020, 105 patients in PD to at least one line of chemotherapy were analyzed. Of these, 27 (25.7%) underwent hepatic resection. After a median follow-up of 30 (IQR 14–46) months, 61.9% were dead. The OS values at 1 and 3 years were 54.4 and 10.6% for CHT, and 95 and 46.8% for HEP (p < 0.001). After IPW, two balanced pseudopopulations were obtained: HEP = 85 and CHT = 103. The OS values at 1 and 3 years were 54.4 and 10.6% for CHT, and 97.8 and 49.3% for HEP (HR 0.256, 95%CI: 0.08–0.78, p = 0.033). After IPW, in the multivariate model, surgery resulted in the only protective variable (HR 0.198, 95%CI: 0.08–0.48, p = 0.0016). Our results show that hepatic resection could offer a chance of a longer OS than the prosecution of chemotherapy only in originally resectable patients.

14 November 2022 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHayato Kurihara
Hayato Kurihara
FBFrancesca Margherita Bunino
Francesca Margherita Bunino
Alessandro FugazzaAlessandro Fugazza
Alessandro Fugazza
EMEnrico Marrano
Enrico Marrano
GMGiulia Mauri
Giulia Mauri
AAAndrea Anderloni
Andrea Anderloni
Background and Objectives: Acute cholecystitis is a frequent cause of admission to the emergency department, especially in old and frail patients. Percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD) and endosonographic guided drainage (EUS-GBD) could be an alternative option for relieving symptoms or act as a definitive treatment instead of a laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy (LC, OC). The aim of the present study was to compare different treatment groups. Materials and Methods: This is a five-year monocentric retrospective study including patients ≥65 years old who underwent an urgent operative procedure. A descriptive analysis was conducted comparing all treatment groups. A propensity score was estimated based on the ACS score, incorporated into a predictive model, and tested by recursive partitioning analysis. Results: 163 patients were included: 106 underwent a cholecystectomy (81 laparoscopic (LC) and 25 Open (OC)), 33 a PT-GBD and 21 EUS-GBD. The sample was categorized into three prognostic groups according to the adverse event occurrence rate. All patients treated with EUS-GBD or LC resulted in the low risk group, and the adverse event rate (AE) was 10/96 (10.4%). The AE was 4/28 (14.2%) and 21/36 (58.3%) in the middle- and high-risk groups respectively (p < 0.001). These groups included all the patients who underwent an OC or a PT-GBD. The PT-GBD group had a lower clinical success rate (55.5%) and higher RR (16,6%) when compared with other groups. Conclusions: Surgery still represents the gold standard for AC treatment. Nevertheless, EUS-GBD is a good alternative to PT-GBD in terms of clinical success, RR and AEs in all kinds of patients.

13 November 2024 in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFrancesca Margherita Bunino
Francesca Margherita Bunino
DZDavide Zulian
Davide Zulian
SFSimone Famularo
Simone Famularo
GPGiorgia Willy Ladini Persichetti
Giorgia Willy Ladini Persichetti
GMGiulia Mauri
Giulia Mauri
DFDaniele Del Fabbro
Daniele Del Fabbro
INTRODUCTION: The open abdomen (OA) technique is nowadays a worldwide strategy both for trauma and emergency general surgery. Despite the attempt at conducting prospective studies, a high level of evidence is far from established. The aim of this study was to investigate if we overused this strategy and if it improved the postoperative course of our patients. METHODS: Emergency laparotomies from 2017 and 2023 were reviewed and stratified according to OA and closed abdomen (CA). Differences were balanced by inverse probability weighting, and the 90-day mortality was estimated. Subgroup analysis was carried out for patients with a Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) of >26, bowel obstruction, bowel ischemia (BI) and gastrointestinal perforation. RESULTS: Of the 320 patients, 167 were CA and 153 were OA. Groups were different for American Society of Anesthesiologists, comorbidities, transfusion rate, Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Study of Mortality and Morbidity score, MPI, Clinical Frailty Scale score, diagnosis, and resection. Two balanced pseudo-populations were created. The 90-day survival rate was 50.8% for CA and 60.8% for OA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; confidence interval [CI], 0.40–1.55; p = 0.502). At the Cox regression, the Clinical Frailty Scale score (HR, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.01–1.25; p = 0.033) and BI (HR, 5.531; 95% CI, 2.37–12.89; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for mortality. Transfusion rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% CI, 1.44–8.23; p < 0.006) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07–1.20; p < 0.001) were associated with major complications. Open abdomen did not modify mortality in the case of bowel obstruction, MPI >26, or gastrointestinal perforation. Finally, OA (HR, 0.056; 95% CI, 0.01–0.22; p = 0.001) and large bowel resection (HR, 6.442; 95% CI, 1.28–32.31; p = 0.040) were predictors of longer survival in the subgroup of patients with BI. CONCLUSION: Open abdomen was not associated with a higher complication rate or higher mortality but did result in a longer in-hospital stay. The only setting where OA seemed to be advantageous was in the BI population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

9 September 2026 in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFrancesca Margherita Bunino
Francesca Margherita Bunino
MCMatteo Maria Cimino
Matteo Maria Cimino
ICIsidro Martinez Casas
Isidro Martinez Casas
GBGabriele Bellio
Gabriele Bellio
MPMatteo Porta
Matteo Porta
HKHayato Kurihara
Hayato Kurihara

5 September 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFrancesca Margherita Bunino
Francesca Margherita Bunino
ELEZIO LANZA
EZIO LANZA
GSGianluca Sellaro
Gianluca Sellaro
RLRiccardo Levi
Riccardo Levi
DZDavide Zulian
Davide Zulian
DFDaniele Del Fabbro
Daniele Del Fabbro
Introduction: Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO) accounts for 15% of emergency department (ED) admissions. While conservative management is recommended, surgery becomes necessary when strangulation is suspected. Identifying which patients need surgery remains a challenge, as traditional imaging lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to explore radiomic features to identify potential predictors of strangulation. Methods: This retrospective study included patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital ED between 2019 and 2023, diagnosed with Adhesion Small Bowel Obstruction (aSBO) via contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans. Two patient groups were examined: those who underwent surgery with bowel resection and ischemic changes confirmed histologically (operative management—OM) and those successfully treated with conservative management (CM). All CT scans were reviewed blindly by a general surgeon and an experienced radiologist. Pre-obstructive loop segmentation was performed using 3D Slicer software, with slice-by-slice contouring of intestinal borders on images of suspected strangulated bowel. Radiomic features were extracted, followed by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results: A total of 55 patients were included: 27 CM and 28 OM. Significant differences emerged in GLCM (Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix), GLDM (Gray Level Dependence Matrix), GLRLM (Gray Level Run Length Matrix), and GLSZM (Gray Level Size Zone Matrix), particularly involving entropy and uniformity. These metrics reflect subtle variations in gray levels not visible to the naked eye. Conclusions: Differences in entropy, uniformity, and energy align with imaging and histopathological findings, supporting the development of radiomic models and future AI-based prediction tools.