Mehrdad Ahmadinejad

Dr. Mehrdad Ahmadinejad

University of Vermont, Burlington, Connecticut, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 December 2022 in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad
RMRouhollah Moosavi
Rouhollah Moosavi

5 July 2023 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEhsanolah Assareh
Ehsanolah Assareh
SASeyed Sajad Mousavi Asl
Seyed Sajad Mousavi Asl
NANeha Agarwal
Neha Agarwal
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad
MGMaryam Ghodrat
Maryam Ghodrat
MLMoonyong Lee
Moonyong Lee

8 October 2022 in International Journal of Green Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad
ASAli Soleimani
Ali Soleimani
AGArian Gerami
Arian Gerami
This research numerically investigates a 3D sinusoidal-fined-based photovoltaic thermal system (FPVTS), which is of a high rate of productivity. The working fluids studied in this work are Cu/water nanofluid and pure water. Simulation accuracy has been verified against published literature data, which showed good agreement. Initially, three configurations including, a PV module, a simple channel photovoltaic thermal system (SPVTS), and the FPVTS, under the same base conditions, were numerically examined and compared. The results revealed that the proposed FPVT system has higher electrical and thermal exergy and energy performances in contrast with the two additional cases. The outcomes show that the FPVTS with Cu/water NF as the working fluid increased both overall exergetic and energetic efficiencies by 2.24% and 7.55%, respectively, compared with the SPVTS via pure water as the working fluid. In addition, a quasi-transient simulation for the FPVTS subject to daily weather conditions has been done. The maximum values for the overall exergy and energy efficiencies are 18.08% and 80.24%, which occurred at hours 12 and 9, respectively, for nanofluid. Also, the impact of miscellaneous quantities comprising volume fraction, volumetric flow rate, and coolant inflow temperature, on the FPVTS’s performance has been studied. Results indicate that high flow rates are more advantageous from an energy viewpoint, while low flow rates are more efficient from an exergy perspective. Low inflow temperatures increase energy efficiency while cutting exergy efficiency.

11 August 2022 in Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad
ASAli Soleimani
Ali Soleimani
AGArian Gerami
Arian Gerami

21 August 2023 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEhsanolah Assareh
Ehsanolah Assareh
SASeyed Sajad Mousavi Asl
Seyed Sajad Mousavi Asl
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad
MPMehdi Parvaz
Mehdi Parvaz
MGMaryam Ghodrat
Maryam Ghodrat

1 January 2008 in Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBum-Jin Chung
Bum-Jin Chung
MKMin Chan Kim
Min Chan Kim
MAMehrdad Ahmadinejad
Mehrdad Ahmadinejad