Sugar transport and distribution plays an important role in lily bulb development and resistance to abiotic stresses. In this study, a member of the Sugar Will Eventually be Exported Transporters (SWEET) gene family, LoSWEET14, from Oriental hybrid lily ‘Sorbonne’ was identified. LoSWEET14 encodes a protein of 278 amino acids and is capable of transporting sucrose and some types of hexoses. The transcript level of the LoSWEET14 gene was significantly increased under various stress conditions including drought, cold, salt stresses, and abscisic acid (ABA) treatment. Overexpression of LoSWEET14 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) showed that the transgenic lines had larger leaves, accumulated more soluble sugars, and were more resistant to drought, cold, and salt stresses, while becoming more sensitive to ABA compared with wild-type lines. Promoter analysis revealed that multiple stress-related cis-acting elements were found in the promoter of LoSWEET14. According to the distribution of cis-acting elements, different lengths of 5′-deletion fragments were constructed and the LoSWEET14-pro3(-540 bp) was found to be able to drive GUS gene expression in response to abiotic stresses and ABA treatment. Furthermore, a yeast one hybrid (Y1H) assay proved that the AREB/ABF (ABRE-binding protein/ABRE-binding factor) from lilies (LoABF2) could bind to the promoter of LoSWEET14. These findings indicated that LoSWEET14 is induced by LoABF2 to participate in the ABA signaling pathway to promote soluble sugar accumulation in response to multiple abiotic stresses.

During the growth cycle of lilies, assimilates undergo a process of accumulation, consumption and reaccumulation in bulbs and are transported and allocated between aboveground and underground organs and tissues. The sink–source relationship changes with the allocation of assimilates, affecting the vegetative growth and morphological establishment of lilies. In this study, the carbohydrate contents in different tissues of five critical stages during lily development were measured to observe the assimilates allocation. The results showed bulbs acted as the main source to provide energy before the budding stage (S3); after the flowering stage (S4), bulbs began to accumulate assimilates as a sink organ again. During the period when the plant height was 30cm with leaf-spread (S2), leaves mainly accumulated assimilates from bulbs through the symplastic pathway, while when leaves were fully expanded, it transformed to export carbohydrates. At the S4 stage, flowers became a new active sink with assimilates influx. To further understand the allocation of assimilates, 16 genes related to sugar transport and metabolism (ST genes) were identified and categorized into different subfamilies based on the phylogenetic analysis, and their protein physicochemical properties were also predicted. Tissue-specific analysis showed that most of the genes were highly expressed in stems and petals, and it was mainly the MST (monosaccharide transporter) genes that were obviously expressed in petals during the S4 stage, suggesting that they may be associated with the accumulation of carbohydrates in flowers and thus affect flower development process. LoSWEET14 (the Sugar will eventually be exported transporters) was significantly correlated with starch in scales and with soluble sugar in leaves. Sugar transporters LoHXT6 and LoSUT1 were significantly correlated with soluble sugar and sucrose in leaves, suggesting that these genes may play key roles in the accumulation and transportation of assimilates in lilies. In addition, we analyzed the expression patterns of ST genes under different abiotic stresses, and the results showed that all genes were significantly upregulated. This study lays a solid foundation for further research on molecular mechanism of sink–source change and response to abiotic stresses in lilies.

The perennial woody plant Hydrangea arborescens ‘Annabelle’ is of great research value due to its unique mechanism of flower development that occurs in the current year, resulting in decorative flowers that can be enjoyed for a relatively long period of time. However, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of current-year flower development in H. arborescens ‘Annabelle’ are still not fully understood. In this study, we conducted an associated analysis to explore the core regulating network in H. arborescens ‘Annabelle’ by combining phenological observations, physiological assays, and transcriptome comparisons across seven flower developmental stages. Through this analysis, we constructed a gene co-expression network (GCN) based on the highest reciprocal rank (HRR), using 509 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from seven flowering-related pathways, as well as the biosynthesis of eight flowering-related phytohormones and signal transduction in the transcriptomic analysis. According to the analysis of the GCN, we identified 14 key genes with the highest functional connectivity that played critical roles in specific development stages. We confirmed that 135 transcription factors (AP2/ERF, bHLH, CO-like, GRAS, MIKC, SBP, WRKY) were highly co-expressed with the 14 key genes, indicating their close associations with the development of current-year flowers. We further proposed a hypothetical model of a gene regulatory network for the development of the whole flower. This model suggested that the photoperiod, aging, and gibberellin pathways, along with the phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellin (GA), brassinosteroid (BR), and jasmonic acid (JA), work synergistically to promote the floral transition. Additionally, auxin, GA, JA, ABA, and salicylic acid (SA) regulated the blooming process by involving the circadian clock. Cytokinin (CTK), ethylene (ETH), and SA were key regulators that affected flower senescence. Additionally, several floral integrators (HaLFY, HaSOC1-2, HaAP1, HaFULL, HaAGL24, HaFLC, etc.) were dominant contributors to the development of H. arborescens flowers. Overall, this research provides a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic mechanism underlying the entire process of current-year flower development, thereby offering valuable insights for further studies on the flower development of H. arborescens ‘Annabelle’.

The flower induction of Hydrangea macrophylla “Endless Summer” is regulated by a complex gene network that involves multiple signaling pathways to ensure continuous flowering throughout the growing season, but the molecular determinants of flower induction are not yet clear. In this study, genes potentially involved in signaling pathway mediating the regulatory mechanism of flower induction were identified through the transcriptomic profiles, and a hypothetical model for this regulatory mechanism was obtained by an analysis of the available transcriptomic data, suggesting that sugar-, hormone-, and flowering-related genes participated in the flower induction process of H. macrophylla “Endless Summer”. The expression profiles of the genes involved in the biosynthesis and metabolism of sugar showed that the beta-amylase gene BAM1 displayed a high expression level at the BS2 stage and implied the hydrolysis of starch. It may be a signaling molecule that promotes the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth in H. macrophylla “Endless Summer”. Complex hormone regulatory networks involved in abscisic acid (ABA), auxin (IAA), zeatin nucleoside (ZR), and gibberellin (GA) also induced flower formation in H. macrophylla. ABA participated in flower induction by regulating flowering genes. The high content of IAA and the high expression level of the auxin influx carrier gene LAX5 at the BS2 stage suggested that the flow of auxin between sources and sinks in H. macrophylla is involved in the regulation of floral induction as a signal. In addition, flowering-related genes were mainly involved in the photoperiodic pathway, the aging pathway, and the gibberellin pathway. As a result, multiple pathways, including the photoperiodic pathway, the aging pathway, and the gibberellin pathway, which were mainly mediated by crosstalk between sugar and hormone signals, regulated the molecular network involved in flower induction in H. macrophylla “Endless Summer”.

With its large inflorescences and colorful flowers, Hydrangea macrophylla has been one of the most popular ornamental plants in recent years. However, the formation mechanism of its major ornamental part, the decorative floret sepals, is still not clear. In this study, we compared the transcriptome data of H. macrophylla ‘Endless Summer’ from the nutritional stage (BS1) to the blooming stage (BS5) and annotated them into the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) databases. The 347 identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with flower development were subjected to a trend analysis and a protein–protein interaction analysis. The combined analysis of the two yielded 60 DEGs, including four MADS-box transcription factors (HmSVP-1, HmSOC1, HmAP1-2, and HmAGL24-3) and genes with strong connectivity (HmLFY and HmUFO). In addition, 17 transcription factors related to the ABCDE model were screened, and key candidate genes related to the development of decorative floret sepals in H. macrophylla were identified by phylogenetic and expression pattern analysis, including HmAP1-1, HmAP1-2, HmAP1-3, HmAP2-3, HmAP2-4, and HmAP2-5. On this basis, a gene regulatory network model of decorative sepal development was also postulated. Our results provide a theoretical basis for the study of the formation mechanism of decorative floret sepals and suggest a new direction for the molecular breeding of H. macrophylla.

SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding Protein-Like (SPL) genes encode plant-specific transcription factors which bind to the SQUAMOSA promoter of the MADS-box genes to regulate its expression. It plays important regulatory roles in floral induction and development, fertility, light signals and hormonal transduction, and stress response in plants. In this study, 32 PySPL genes with complete SBP (squamosa promoter binding protein) conserved domain were identified from the genome of Prunus × yedoensis ‘Somei-yoshino’ and analyzed by bioinformatics. 32 PySPLs were distributed on 13 chromosomes, encoding 32 PySPL proteins with different physical and chemical properties. The phylogenetic tree constructed with Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa can be divided into 10 subtribes, indicating PySPLs of different clusters have different biological functions. The conserved motif prediction showed that the number and distribution of motifs on each PySPL is varied. The gene structure analysis revealed that PySPLs harbored exons ranging from 2 to 10. The predictive analysis of acting elements showed that the promoter of PySPLs contain a large number of light-responsive elements, as well as response elements related to hormone response, growth and development and stress response. The analysis of the PySPLs expressions in flower induction and flower organs based on qRT-PCR showed that PySPL06/22 may be the key genes of flower development, PySPL01/06 and PySPL22 may play a role in the development of sepal and pistil, respectively. The results provide a foundation for the study of SPL transcription factors of Prunus × yedoensis ‘Somei-yoshino’ and provide more reference information of the function of SPL gene in flowering.