In polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies are closely associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), a frequent pulmonary complication. However, the clinical significance of anti-ARS antibodies is not well established. We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of anti-ARS antibodies in PM/DM-ILD patients. Forty-eight consecutive PM/DM-ILD patients were studied retrospectively. Anti-ARS antibodies were screened by ELISA and confirmed by RNA immunoprecipitation test. Medical records, high-resolution computed tomography images, and surgical lung biopsy specimens were compared between ARS-positive (ARS group) and ARS-negative patients (non-ARS group). Anti-ARS antibodies were detected in 23 of 48 patients (48%). Radiologically, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern was observed more frequently in the ARS group than in the non-ARS group (73.9% vs. 40%, P = 0.02). Pathologically, NSIP was the most frequent in both groups. Ten-year survival rate was also significantly higher in the ARS group than in the non-ARS group (91.6% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.02). Univariate Cox hazards analysis revealed that the presence of anti-ARS antibodies was associated with better prognosis (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.08–0.80; P = 0.01). The presence of anti-ARS antibodies is a possible prognostic marker in patients with PM/DM-ILD.

Background: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) is a recently reported group of disorders characterized by fibrotic thickening of the pleural and subpleural parenchyma predominantly in the upper lobes. We report five Japanese cases fulfilling the criteria of IPPFE and address whether it should be considered a separate clinicopathologic entity. And this study was an attempt to identify features in common between IPPFE and previously described idiopathic upper lobe fibrosis (IPUF), allowing IPPFE to be considered as a distinct entity in our Japanese series. Methods: Five consecutive cases of idiopathic interstitial lung disease confirmed as IPPFE by surgical lung biopsy were studied. Results: There were four males and one female, aged 70±2.76 yr. No associated disorder or presumed cause was found in any case. Lung function tests found a restrictive ventilatory defect (4/5) and/or impairment of DLco (4/5). Chest X-ray showed marked apical pleural thickening in all cases. Computed tomography of the chest in all cases mainly showed intense pleural thickening and volume loss associated with evidence of fibrosis, predominantly in the upper lobes. In all cases in this study, markedly thickened visceral pleura and prominent subpleural fibrosis characterized by both elastic tissue and dense collagen were clearly shown. All cases were alive at the last follow-up, 17.6±13.59 months after diagnosis; however, all had deteriorated both clinically and radiologically. Conclusions: IPPFE deserves to be defined as a separate, original clinicopathologic entity owing to its uniformity and IPPFE has some features in common with previously described idiopathic upper lobe fibrosis (IPUF). Our limited experience with a cohort of 5 subjects suggests that IPPFE can be rapidly progressive.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) has an extremely poor prognosis and there is currently no effective treatment for this condition. Direct hemoperfusion with a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) improves oxygenation, but it is unclear whether treatment of AE-IPF with PMX-DHP affects survival. This study elucidated the effectiveness and safety of PMX-DHP for the treatment of AE-IPF. This study included 31 patients with 41 episodes of AE-IPF. All patients received steroids. Of 31, 14 patients (20 episodes) were treated with PMX-DHP. The laboratory and physiological test results after the start of therapy and survival were retrospectively compared between patients treated with and without PMX-DHP. Patients treated with PMX-DHP had a significantly greater change in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (mean ± SEM, 58.2 ± 22.5 vs. 0.7 ± 13.3, p = 0.034) and a smaller change in white blood cell count (−630 ± 959 /μL vs. 4500 ± 1190 /μL, p = 0.002) after 2 days of treatment than patients treated without PMX-DHP. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in patients treated with PMX-DHP (48.2% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.041). PMX-DHP was effective in patients with more severe underlying disease (GAP stages II or III; 12-month survival rate 57.1% with PMX-DHP vs. 0% without PMX-DHP, p = 0.021). Treatment with PMX-DHP was an independent predictor of better prognosis (hazard ratio 0.345, p = 0.037). Mild pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in one patient treated with PMX-DHP. Treatment of AE-IPF with PMX-DHP is tolerable and improves 12-month survival.