Jian Lan

Jian Lan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 December 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BWBin Wang
Bin Wang
JDJianqiang Deng
Jianqiang Deng
TWTengfei Wang
Tengfei Wang
WNWang Ni
Wang Ni
QFqin feng
qin feng
JLJian Lan
Jian Lan
Mixing cereal with legume crops is an efficient approach for improving forage production and ensuring the sustainable development of agriculture and livestock. However, the knowledge of the relationship between forage production and interspecific competition in the forage oat (Avena sativa L.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) mixed cropping system remains unclear. A 2-year field experiment was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to investigate the effects of different mixed cropping systems (peer mixing (PM), alternate-row mixing (AM), cross mixing (CM), bar mixing (BM), sole forage oat (SO), and sole common vetch (SV)) on the dry matter production, forage quality, land equivalent ratio (LER), and competition parameters. The results showed that the system forage yield increased by 13.4–202.8% when forage oat was mixed with common vetch (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was obtained between the AM and PM mixed cropping systems. Additionally, the forage oat–common vetch mixed cropping improved crude protein yield by 52.5–150.1% compared with monocultures (p < 0.05). The LER values were greater than the one when forage oat was mixed with common vetch, especially for the AM system (averaged 1.38). In addition, forage oat was the dominant crop and had higher aggressiveness and competitive ratios compared to common vetch, but without a significant difference in the aggressiveness and competitive ratio in mixed cropping systems. It indicated that mixing of cereal with legume crops was helpful in enhancing resource use efficiency without obvious interspecific competition. Consequently, the AM mixed cropping system is recommended for supporting the sustainable development of agriculture and livestock production in the arid region of China when considering both forage production and nutritional quality.

29 July 2024 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWTengfei Wang
Tengfei Wang
BWBin Wang
Bin Wang
AXAiping Xiao
Aiping Xiao
JLJian Lan
Jian Lan
Cereal and legume mixed cropping has been widely adopted to increase forage production in the sustainable development of agriculture and livestock. Among the different mixed cropping combinations, forage sorghum and lablab bean mixed cropping can be adapted globally. However, knowledge regarding the relation between forage production, interspecific competition, and resource utilization efficiency in the forage sorghum and lablab bean mixed cropping system remains unclear. A 3-year field experiment was conducted in 2020, 2021, and 2022 to investigate the effects of different cropping systems (16.5 kg·ha−1 lablab bean mixed cropping with forage sorghum [SD1], 33.0 kg·ha−1 lablab bean mixed cropping with forage sorghum [SD2], 49.5 kg·ha−1 lablab bean mixed cropping with forage sorghum [SD3], 66.0 kg·ha−1 lablab bean mixed cropping with forage sorghum [SD4], sole forage sorghum [SS], and sole lablab bean [DD]) on forage production, forage quality, competition parameters, water use efficiency (WUE), and radiation use efficiency (RUE). The results obtained revealed that mixed cropping practices enhanced forage yield by mitigating soil water depletion and optimizing canopy structures. Specifically, SD3 treatment was an efficient farming practice that increased system dry matter yield by 32.6–67.5%, crude protein yield by 12.5–15.1%, WUE by 9.2–67.4%, and RUE by 39.6–38.2% compared with other treatments. In addition, SD4 treatment increased crude protein content by 11.1% compared with forage sorghum monocropping; however, there were no significant differences in crude protein between SD3 and SD4 mixed cropping systems. The land equivalent ratio values were greater than one when forage sorghum was mixed with lablab bean, especially for the SD3 system (averaged 1.43). In addition, forage sorghum was more dominant and had higher aggressiveness (0.65) and competitive ratios (3.44) than lablab bean. This indicates that mixing cereals with legumes enhances RUE by interspecific competition. Consequently, the SD3-mixed cropping system is recommended for supporting the sustainable development of agriculture and livestock production in the arid region of China when considering forage production and nutritional quality.

8 April 2025 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QFQin Feng
Qin Feng
XWXiangyu Wei
Xiangyu Wei
JDJianqiang Deng
Jianqiang Deng
TWTengfei Wang
Tengfei Wang
JLJian Lan
Jian Lan
SUSamaila Usman
Samaila Usman

26 December 2024 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXiangyu Wei
Xiangyu Wei
QFqin feng
qin feng
JDJianqiang Deng
Jianqiang Deng
HHHaiying Hu
Haiying Hu
QMQiaoli Ma
Qiaoli Ma
JLJian Lan
Jian Lan
Intensive annual forage cultivation via diversified sowing can increase resource-use efficiency and meet the food requirements of the growing population. However, increasing cultivation time could increase energy demands and production costs with accompanying environmental hazards, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A 2-year field experiment including three cropping systems (forage oat monoculture [O], forage oat–common vetch mixed-cropping [O/V], and common vetch monoculture [V]) and two sowing dates (spring and summer) was conducted to comprehensively assess productivity performance, energy utilization, and ecological efficiency under a cereal–legume mixed system over two sowing seasons in Northwestern China. The average system dry matter yield and economic benefit in the mixed system increased by 70.9% and 132.6%, respectively, compared to those of the monoculture system. The application of a mixed-cropping system increased energy efficiency and the ecoefficiency index (EEI) by 61.4% and 132.3%, respectively, with a decline in GHG emission intensity (GHGI) by 49.9%. Spring sowing increased average forage productivity and economic benefit by 9.3% and 18.6%, respectively, with a 23.0% decline in GHGI compared with that engendered by summer sowing. However, there was no correlation between the mixed-cropping system and single sowing date, and the average dry matter yield, economic benefit, and GHGI of the mixed-cropping system were 7.8 t ha−1, 1478.4 USD ha−1, and 0.3 kg CO2e kg−1, respectively. Furthermore, compared with the monoculture system, the combination of spring and summer seasons under the mixed-cropping system could increase the average annual system forage productivity, economic benefit, and EEI by 37.0%, 49.9%, and 53.1%, respectively, while reducing GHGI by 48.4%. This study demonstrates that the mixed forage oat and common vetch during spring and summer was the sustainable cropping system that achieved high system productivity, good economic returns, high energy utilization, and low environmental risk in Northwestern China.