The past decade has seen numerous advancements in approaches to melanoma detection, each with the common goal to stem the growing incidence of melanoma and its mortality rate. These advancements, while well documented to increase early melanoma detection, have also garnered considerable criticism of their efficacy for improving survival rates. In this review, we discuss the current state of such early detection approaches that do not require direct dermatologist intervention. Our findings suggest that a number of at-home and non-specialist methods exist with high accuracy for detecting melanoma, albeit with a few notable concerns worth further investigation. Additionally, research continues to find new approaches using artificial intelligence which have promise for the future.

The current standard for investigating tumors is surgical biopsy, which is costly, invasive, and difficult to perform serially. As an adjunct, circulating tumor cells (CTCs)—cells that have broken away from the primary tumor or metastatic sites—can be obtained from a blood draw and offer the potential for obtaining serial genetic information and serving as biomarkers. Here, we detail the potential for melanoma CTCs to serve as biomarkers and discuss a clinically viable methodology for single-cell CTC isolation and analysis that overcomes previous limitations. We explore the use of melanoma CTC biomarkers by isolating and performing single-cell RNA sequencing on CTCs from melanoma patients. We then compared transcriptional profiles of single melanoma CTCs against A375 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells to identify unique genes differentially regulated in circulating melanoma tumor cells. The information that can be obtained via analysis of these CTCs has significant potential in disease tracking.

Immune related adverse events (irAEs) are one of the leading causes of discontinuation of cancer immunotherapy treatment. Despite extensive research into the frequency and types of irAEs, little is known about the cell types and pathways through which these drugs cause the observed side effects. To identify cell types and pathways of interest, we have analyzed single cell sequencing data of PBMCs from patients who developed skin irAEs as a result of their immunotherapy treatment. Using Azimuth’s cell type identification software for PBMCs and GSEA pathway analysis, we found macrophage cell populations and reactive oxygen species related pathways to be upregulated. These results provide important groundwork to build a complete picture of the mechanisms which cause irAEs and finding ways to more effectively treat them.

Healthy human skin tissue is often used as a control for comparison to diseased skin in patients with skin pathologies, including skin cancers or other inflammatory conditions such as atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. Although non-affected skin from these patients is a more appropriate choice for comparison, there is a paucity of studies examining such tissue. This lack is exacerbated by the difficulty of processing skin tissue for experimental analysis. In addition, choosing a processing protocol for skin tissue which preserves cell viability and identity while sufficiently dissociating cells for single-cell analysis is not a trivial task. Here, we compare three digestion methods for human skin tissue, evaluating the cell yield and viability for each protocol. We find that the use of a sequential dissociation method with multiple enzymatic digestion steps produces the highest cell viability. Using single-cell sequencing, we show this method results in a relative increase in the proportion of non-antigen-presenting mast cells and CD8 T cells as well as a relative decrease in the proportion of antigen-presenting mast cells and KYNU⁺ CD4 T cells. Overall, our findings support the use of this sequential digestion method on freshly processed human skin samples for optimal cell yield and viability.

BRAF-mutant melanoma patients can be treated with targeted therapy or immunotherapies, and it is not clear which should be provided first. Targeted treatments do not work in up to one-third of cases, while immunotherapies may only be effective in up to 60% and come with a high risk of immune-related side effects. Determining which treatment to provide first is thus of critical importance. Recent studies suggest that chromosomal instability and aneuploidy and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) can act as biomarkers for cancer severity and patient outcome. Neither potential biomarker has been extensively studied in melanoma. We examined 20 BRAF-mutant melanomas treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy and measured chromosomal aneuploidy and cGAS expression levels. Treatment type, aneuploidy, and cGAS expression were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. Those treated with immunotherapy first had significantly better outcomes than those treated with targeted therapy, suggesting immunotherapy should be strongly considered as the first-line therapy for patients bearing BRAF-mutant melanoma. We found that there was no correlation of aneuploidy with outcome while there was some positive correlation of cGAS levels with PFS. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to test other potential biomarkers.