Security personnel are the first ones who attend the scene in the case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at malls. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not enough for those patients; they need an automated external defibrillator (AED) to bring the heart to function normally. This study aimed to assess the current status of CPR and AED knowledge and availability in Saudi malls by security personnel. Using a descriptive design, a study was conducted at seven malls located in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Two hundred and fifty participants were surveyed using the American Heart Association (AHA) 2015 guidelines to assess CPR and AED knowledge and availability in Saudi malls. The sample mean age was 32.60 years (SD = 10.02), and 87% of participants were working as security personnel. The majority of the participants had not received training about CPR and AED (75.8% and 95.2%, respectively). Common misconceptions are fallen into all categories of CPR and AED knowledge. Correctly answered statements ranged from 7.2% in the compression rate to 24.2% in hand placement. The study results indicated a poor training knowledge of CPR and AED in public settings. Integrating high-quality CPR and AED knowledge within the school and college curricula is a vital need. However, in order to maximize the survival rate, it is important to set laws and legislation adopted by stakeholders and decision makers to advocate the people who try to help, mandate AED installation in crowded places, and mandate teaching hands-only CPR and AED together as a package.

Shared governance is examined through a framework for developing independent decision making in professional nursing practice and improving patient care outcomes. This study is designed to obtain a baseline measurement of the degree of shared governance in a selected children’s hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was guided by the Donabedian model. The Professional Nursing Governance Index was used. A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed to nurses working at the hospital, with a response rate of 77% (n = 307). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis. The results corresponded with those from nurses and managers in most subscales of the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (information, goals, resources, participation and practice). However, nurses working in the operating theatre and surgical unit have a perceived higher level of shared governance than those in critical care units and medical wards. The results could encourage shareholders and leaders in the nursing field to develop the perception of shared governance by adopting a shared governance model, which in turn might improve the quality of nursing care.

Despite the efforts of emerging technologies in the healthcare system, there is still a slower rate of acceleration in prehospital settings compared with the hospitals in digital transformation adaptation. The acknowledgment that digital transformation is significant to healthcare is reflected in planning for the future of digital healthcare. Thus, this study aimed to measure the usability of the electronic patient care report (ePCR) system among emergency medical services (EMS) staff who work in prehospital settings. A descriptive cross-sectional correlation study was used. Two hundred fifty EMS staff who are working in the prehospital setting at Saudi Red Crescent Authority in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were surveyed, and the response rate was 79.2% (198). An adapted tool of the Computer System Usability Questionnaire survey was used to collect data. The data were coded numerically and subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis including Pearson’s correlation coefficient using the statistical software (SPSS 21). The majority of the participants rate their ePCR system as “useable” at a high level with a score of 3.41 (SD = 1.021). The overall mean of the ePCR system’s three subscales: system usefulness, information quality, interface quality, and overall satisfaction were 3.39 (SD = 1.152), 3.30 (SD = 1.052), 3.57 (SD = 1.064), and 3.37 (SD = 1.239), respectively. The least liked aspect of ePCR system software was information quality 81 (40.9%). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between the age of EMS staff and the usability of the ePCR system (r = −0.150 ${\hspace{0.17em}}^{\ast }$ , $P=0.035$ ). The results suggest that healthcare institutions’ policy and decision-makers pay close attention to performing standardized training for the staff on their ePCR system before going to the field to increase efficiency and productivity. Furthermore, the users in this study identified other system features that, if included, could have enhanced usability, and improved functions and capabilities of the design to meet the EMS staff’s expectations.

Background: The clinical learning environment is a fundamental component of healthcare education. In this setting, students can develop the skills and knowledge necessary to become competent and efficient healthcare practitioners. Due to the importance of clinically based education, it is crucial to have a valid and reliable tool to enable its evaluation. Objective: The aim of this study was to use the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) to examine the perceptions of Saudi undergraduate healthcare students regarding their actual and preferred clinical learning environment and explore the differences between the two viewpoints. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was utilised with a cohort of Saudi undergraduate healthcare students. Data regarding perceptions of the ‘actual’ and ‘preferred’ clinical learning environments were gathered with the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory tool. Results: A total of 194 students participated and nine healthcare disciplines were represented. The highest mean score for both ‘actual’ and ‘preferred’ clinical learning environment was for the subscale Task Orientation. Significant differences between ‘actual’ and ‘preferred’ environments were demonstrated for Innovation and Individualization, with both subscales scoring higher for the ‘preferred’ environment. All five subscales–Individualization, Innovation, Involvement, Personalization, and Task Orientation–appear to be important aspects contributing to student satisfaction with their clinical learning environment. Conclusion: Saudi healthcare students demonstrate a preference for a clinical learning environment with the utilization of new and interesting experiences, as well as recognition and accommodation of student individuality. Additionally, student satisfaction appears to be multifactorial in origin. Therefore, there may be many avenues available to enhance the clinical experiences of healthcare students, which is vitally important for the optimization of clinical learning opportunities.

Examining students’ contentment with simulation is crucial for giving local and foreign academic teaching personnel feedback. The purpose of this study was to compare students studying emergency medical services’ simulation satisfaction. There were 193 students involved in a comparison cross-sectional design during the second semester of the academic year 2018 utilizing a paper-based English version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. The findings revealed a slight to moderate positive correlation for factor two (clinical reasoning), 0.510 (P<0.001); and factor three (clinical learning), 0.628 (P<0.001) for students. A slight negative correlation was also found in factor one (debrief and feedback) 0.092 (P<0.001). The study showed that the reliability was 0.906 for factor one, 0.860 for factor two and 0.872 for factor three. Cronbach’s Alpha for all factors: 0.937. ANOVA showed that factor three is significant with students’ level (df 3, f, 4.186, sig. 0.007). Compared to other factors, students were less satisfied with clinical learning simulation, due to unfamiliarity of students with the simulation mannequin and environment. The frequent implementation of simulation practice in emergency medical services field is highly recommended to enhance mainly clinical learning, master new skills and satisfaction with the learning experience.

Clear communication during emergency care handovers is crucial for patient safety, but barriers can compromise the process, increasing risks. The aim of this study is to compare and assess communication handover barriers perceived by nurses and paramedics in emergency care settings. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the modified Nursing Handover Perspectives Questionnaire. A convenience sample was used to recruit nurses and paramedics from multiple prehospital and emergency care settings in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed with SPSS 29, employing descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests to compare scores between nurses and paramedics. Pearson correlations were utilized to explore relationships between perceptions and demographic variables. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Out of 250 distributed questionnaires, 219 were completed (87.6% response rate). Most participants were male (75.3%) and held a bachelor’s degree (70.8%). Nurses tended to be older compared to paramedics, who were younger. Nurses reported greater awareness regarding the omission of important vital sign measurements during handover (p = 0.006) and greater opportunities to ask questions about things they did not understand (p = 0.049). Paramedics reported experiencing interruptions during handover at a higher rate than nurses (p = 0.036). Nurses also perceived greater benefit in using a structured handover tool like ISBAR for improving communication (p = 0.014) and patient safety (p = 0.019). No significant correlations were found between demographic variables and perceptions of communication handover barriers. Nurses reported a higher awareness of omitted vital signs during handover, while paramedics experienced more frequent interruptions. Addressing these barriers through targeted training and the use of supportive technologies may improve communication and patient safety in emergency care. Strengthening collaboration between nurses and paramedics, along with reducing interruptions, could support more effective care transitions. This study adds a comparative perspective on handover barriers in emergency settings and identifies areas for potential intervention. The findings contribute to ongoing discussions on enhancing handover practices and highlight the perceived value of structured frameworks and technology-driven solutions for improving communication efficiency and safety.