Ursula Wiedermann

Prof. Ursula Wiedermann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 1997 in Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CEC. Ebner
C. Ebner
USU. Siemann
U. Siemann
BBB. Bohle
B. Bohle
MWM. Willheim
M. Willheim
UWUrsula Wiedermann
Ursula Wiedermann
OSO. Scheiner
O. Scheiner

1 December 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREmil Christian Reisinger
Emil Christian Reisinger
RTRoland Tschismarov
Roland Tschismarov
EBEckhard Beubler
Eckhard Beubler
UWUrsula Wiedermann
Ursula Wiedermann
CFChrista Firbas
Christa Firbas
KRKatrin Ramsauer
Katrin Ramsauer

7 August 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAnnika De Sousa Linhares
Annika De Sousa Linhares
CBClaire Battin
Claire Battin
SJSabrina Jutz
Sabrina Jutz
JLJudith Leitner
Judith Leitner
CHChristine Hafner
Christine Hafner
PSPeter Steinberger
Peter Steinberger
Inhibitors of PD-1 signaling have revolutionized cancer therapy. PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies have been approved for the treatment of cancer. To date, therapeutic PD-1 inhibitors have not been compared in a functional assay. We used an efficient T cell reporter platform to evaluate the efficacy of five clinically used PD-1 inhibitors to block PD-1 signaling. The half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) for nivolumab and pembrolizumab were 76.17 ng/ml (95% CI 64.95–89.34 ng/ml) and 39.90 ng/ml (34.01–46.80 ng/ml), respectively. The EC50 values of the PD-L1 inhibitors were 6.46 ng/ml (5.48–7.61 ng/ml), 6.15 ng/ml (5.24–7.21 ng/ml) and 7.64 ng/ml (6.52–8.96 ng/ml) for atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab, respectively. In conclusion, a functional assay evaluating antibodies targeting PD-1 inhibition in vitro revealed that pembrolizumab is a slightly more effective PD-1 blocker than nivolumab, and that PD-L1 antibodies are superior to PD-1 antibodies in reverting PD-1 signaling.

11 August 2015 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
UWUrsula Wiedermann
Ursula Wiedermann
EGErika Garner-Spitzer
Erika Garner-Spitzer
AWAngelika Wagner
Angelika Wagner
There are 2 major factors responsible for vaccine failures, the first is vaccine-related such as failures in vaccine attenuation, vaccination regimes or administration. The other is host-related, of which host genetics, immune status, age, health or nutritional status can be associated with primary or secondary vaccine failures. The first describes the inability to respond to primary vaccination, the latter is characterized by a loss of protection after initial effectiveness. Our studies concentrate on the evaluation of immunological characteristics responsible for primary vaccine failures in different (risk) populations for which the underlying mechanisms are currently unknown. Here we summarise current knowledge and findings from our studies. About 2–10% of healthy individuals fail to mount antibody levels to routine vaccines. Comparing the immune responses to different vaccines in non-responder and high-responder vaccinees revealed that hypo-responsiveness is antigen/vaccine-specific at the humoral but not at the cellular level. We found that T-regulatory as well as B-regulatory cells and the production of IL-10 are involved in non/hypo-responsiveness. Non-responsiveness increases with age and in particular vaccination to a novel vaccine in persons > 65 years is associated with a high low/non-responder rate, indicating that vaccine schedules and doses (at least for primary vaccination) should be adapted according to age. In light of the growing number of allergic but also obese people, our current studies concentrate on these risk groups to reveal whether different vaccination approaches are necessary for optimal protection compared to healthy individuals. These studies are in line with the significant paradigm shift taking place in many fields of medical research and care, and will extend the concept of personalised medicine into the field of vaccinology.

1 October 1998 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRuth Fritsch
Ruth Fritsch
BBBarbara Bohle
Barbara Bohle
UVUte Vollmann
Ute Vollmann
UWUrsula Wiedermann
Ursula Wiedermann
BJBeatrice Jahn-Schmid
Beatrice Jahn-Schmid
CEChristof Ebner
Christof Ebner

29 June 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAngelika Wagner
Angelika Wagner
EGErika Garner-Spitzer
Erika Garner-Spitzer
JJJoanna Jasinska
Joanna Jasinska
HKHerwig Kollaritsch
Herwig Kollaritsch
KSKarin Stiasny
Karin Stiasny
UWUrsula Wiedermann
Ursula Wiedermann
Immunosenescence is characterised by reduced B and T cell responses. Evidence shows that booster vaccinations are less effective in elderly people, but data on the efficacy of primary immunisation are sparse. We conducted a monocentric, open label, phase IV trial to compare immune responses to primary vaccinations using the inactivated, adjuvanted Japanese Encephalitis vaccine by 30 elderly people (mean 69, range 61–78 years) and 30 younger people (mean 24, range 18–30 years). Humoral and cellular immune responses were analysed in relation to age and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity. Vaccine-specific antibody titres were significantly lower in elderly participants and 47% of them were non- or low responders after the two doses of the vaccine neo-antigen. The reduced humoral immune responses in elderly people correlated with reduced cytokine production, such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in vitro, as well as higher frequencies of late-differentiated effector and effector memory T cells and T regulatory cells. These cellular changes and lower antibody titres were particularly prominent in CMV-seropositive elderly participants. If primary vaccination before the age of 60 is not possible, elderly patients may require different vaccination strategies to ensure sufficient long-lasting immunity, such as adapted or accelerated schedules and the use of different adjuvants.