Objective: To evaluate the morphometric changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth (MXAT) after en masse retraction with maximum anchorage (EMR-MA). Materials and Methods: The samples consisted of 37 female adult patients who had Class I dentoalveolar protrusion (CI-DAP) and were treated by extraction of the first premolars and EMR-MA. Using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography taken before treatment and after space closure, the maxillary central incisors (MXCI, N = 66), lateral incisors (MXLI, N = 69), and canines (MXC, N = 69) were superimposed using individual reference planes. After alveolar bone area (ABA), vertical bone level (VBL), root length (RL), root area (RA), and prevalence of dehiscence (PD) were measured at the cervical, middle, and apical levels, statistical analyses were performed. Results: On the palatal side, ABA significantly decreased in all levels of MXAT (P < .001; middle of MXC, P < .01). MXCI and MXLI exhibited a greater decrease in the ratio of change in palatal ABA than did MXC (cervical, P < .01; middle and apical, P < .05; total, P < .001). Palatal/labial ABA ratios decreased in MXCI (cervical, middle, total, P < .001; apical, P < .05) and MXLI (cervical, P < .001; apical, P < .05). They showed greater amounts and ratios of change in VBL on the palatal side compared to the labial side (all P < .001). The palatal side showed more PD in the cervical area than did the labial side (MXCI and MXLI, P < .001; MXC, P < .01). Significant root resorption occurred in MXAT (RL and RA, all P < .001). Conclusions: During EMR-MA in cases with CI-DAP, ABA and VBL on the palatal side and RL and RA of MXCI and MXLI were significantly decreased.

Objective: To compare the short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy with miniplates (FM-MP) and face mask therapy with rapid maxillary expansion appliance (FM-RME) in growing Class III malocclusion patients with maxillary hypoplasia. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients were allocated into two groups according to the anchorage device: FM-MP group (n = 10; mean age = 11.2 ± 1.2 years; miniplates in the zygomatic buttress area) and FM-RME group (n = 10; mean age = 10.7 ± 1.3 years; bonded or banded RME). The face mask was applied for 12 to 14 hours/day in both groups with a force of 400 g/side directed 30° downward and forward from the occlusal plane. Lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after FM-MP or FM-RME therapy (T2). Skeletodental and soft-tissue variables were measured. Paired and independent t -tests were performed for statistical analysis. Results: Both groups exhibited significant forward movement of point A and posterior repositioning and opening rotation of the mandible from T2 to T1. The FM-MP group showed significant protraction of orbitale (ΔSNO), and the FM-RME group showed a decrease in overbite and an increase in Björk sum. Comparing the amount of changes between the two groups, the FM-MP group displayed greater forward movement of the maxilla than the FM-RME group (ΔSNA, ΔA to N perp, all P < .05). However, the FM-RME group exhibited a greater opening rotation of the mandible (ΔSNB, Björk sum, all P < .01; ΔPog to N-perp, P < .05) and labioversion of the maxillary incisors (ΔU1-FH, P < .05). Conclusion: FM-MP therapy induces a greater advancement of the maxilla, less posterior repositioning and opening rotation of the mandible, and less proclination of the maxillary incisors than FM-RME therapy.