Background and Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) refixation with vitrectomy in patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) due to IOL subluxation. Materials and Methods: Patients with elevated IOP due to IOL subluxation who had undergone IOL refixation with vitrectomy between 1 June 2013 and 31 December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome measure was surgical success or failure. Surgical success was defined as a reduction of ≥20% in the preoperative IOP or IOP ≤ 21 mmHg (criterion A), IOP ≤ 18 mmHg (criterion B), or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg (criterion C). Reoperation, loss of light perception, and hypotony were considered as surgical failure. The IOP, number of glaucoma medications used, postoperative complications, and visual acuity were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. The surgical outcomes were compared between the glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH) groups. Results: At 12 months postoperatively, the probability of success was 72.5%, 54.1%, and 28.4% using criterion A, B, and C, respectively, and the mean IOP and mean number of glaucoma medications used had decreased significantly (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, the cumulative success rate was significantly higher in the OH group than in the glaucoma (100% vs. 47.4%; p < 0.01) when using criterion A. Additional glaucoma surgery was required only in the glaucoma group. Conclusions: IOL refixation surgery significantly decreases the IOP and number of glaucoma medications required in patients with elevated IOP due to IOL subluxation. Thus, IOL refixation surgery alone without glaucoma surgery might be effective as the primary procedure in such patients.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) improves visual acuity. However, repeated injections during routine outpatient visits are required to maintain this effect. The recent sudden global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had a major impact on daily life, including medical care, such as the provision of VEGF therapy. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between the number of anti-VEGF injections for DME and the number of new COVID-19-positive patients at 23 centers in Japan. We also surveyed ophthalmologists regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-VEGF therapy. In the third and fourth waves of the pandemic, when the number of infected patients increased, the number of injections significantly decreased. In the first, third, and fourth waves, the number of injections increased significantly during the last month of each wave. Approximately 60.9% of ophthalmologists reported that the number of injections decreased after the pandemic. Of the facilities, 52.2% extended the clinic visit intervals; however, there was no significant difference in the actual number of injections given between before and after the pandemic. Although the number of injections temporarily decreased, Japanese ophthalmologists maintained the total annual number of anti-VEGF injections for DME during the pandemic.

Background/Objectives: Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitors reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) by enhancing aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork–Schlemm’s canal pathway. However, it remains unclear whether the fixed-dose combination of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate and brimonidine tartrate (GLAALPHA) enhances conventional aqueous outflow in vivo. Methods: This single-center randomized clinical trial included healthy adult volunteers who received GLAALPHA, a brimonidine tartrate–brinzolamide fixed-dose combination (Ailamide), or brimonidine tartrate monotherapy (Aiphagan) in a crossover sequence. The aqueous column width in the episcleral veins was assessed at baseline and at 2 h (primary outcome) and 8 h using hemoglobin video imaging. Results: Among 24 participants, analyses included 23 GLAALPHA-treated eyes, 21 Ailamide-treated eyes, and 22 Aiphagan-treated eyes. Two hours after instillation, the aqueous column width significantly increased from baseline only in the GLAALPHA group (p = 0.002). The percent increase in the aqueous column width at 2 h was significantly greater with GLAALPHA than with Ailamide (p = 0.039) and not significantly different between GLAALPHA and Aiphagan (p = 0.114). At 8 h, the aqueous column width did not differ from the baseline in any groups. Conclusions: In healthy adult eyes, GLAALPHA significantly increased the aqueous column width in the episcleral veins 2 h after instillation, indicating enhanced conventional aqueous outflow. These findings provide evidence that GLAALPHA promotes trabecular outflow beyond the effects of brimonidine tartrate-containing comparators and offer mechanistic insights into its action.