Jane Walsh

Prof. Jane Walsh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2005 in Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMolly Byrne
Molly Byrne
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
AMAndrew W. Murphy
Andrew W. Murphy

22 September 2016 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
TCTeresa Corbett
Teresa Corbett
MHMichael Hogan
Michael Hogan
Jim DugganJim Duggan
Jim Duggan
AMAbra McNamara
Abra McNamara
Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health.

1 May 2016 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEimear C. Morrissey
Eimear C. Morrissey
TCTeresa K. Corbett
Teresa K. Corbett
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
GMGerard J. Molloy
Gerard J. Molloy

6 December 2022 in JMIR Serious Games
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DHDavid Healy
David Healy
Aisling FlynnAisling Flynn
Aisling Flynn
OCOwen Conlan
Owen Conlan
JMJenny McSharry
Jenny McSharry
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
Background: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can be defined as a fully computer-generated environment shown on a head-mounted display. Existing research suggests that key features of IVR can assist older adults in their everyday lives, providing opportunities for health promotion and tackling social isolation and loneliness. There has been a surge in qualitative studies exploring older adults’ experiences and perceptions of IVR. However, there has been no systematic synthesis of these studies to inform the design of new, more accessible IVR technologies. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize qualitative studies exploring older adults’ experiences and perceptions of IVR. Methods: A systematic review and thematic synthesis were conducted following the ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) guidelines. In total, 2 reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Thematic synthesis is derived from the qualitative method, thematic analysis. It involves 3 key steps: initial coding and grouping of these codes, the formation of descriptive themes from these codes, and going beyond these data to form analytical themes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach. Results: Overall, 13 studies were included in the final synthesis, including 224 participants across 9 countries and 5 continents. Confidence in the evidence ranged from high to moderate. Three descriptive themes were generated: practical aspects of IVR use, experiencing unique features of IVR, and perceptions of IVR. The findings from the descriptive themes suggested that there are several improvements that need to be made to existing IVR devices to facilitate older adults’ use of this technology. However, older adults’ responses to IVR were generally positive. Three analytical themes were generated: tolerating the bad to experience the good, buying in to IVR (don’t judge a book by its cover), and “it proves to me I can do it.” The analytical themes illustrated that older adults were willing to tolerate discomforts that accompany existing IVR technologies to experience features such as immersive social networking. There was a discrepancy between older adults’ perceptions of IVR before use—which were generally negative—and after use—which were generally positive—and IVR provided a platform for older adults to access certain activities and environments more easily than in the real world because of limitations caused by aging. Conclusions: This review offers insights into older adults’ experiences and perceptions of IVR and suggests how a few improvements to its existing hardware and software as well as how it is first presented could offer new opportunities for older adults to take part in meaningful activities tailored to their needs and preferences. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020200774; https://tinyurl.com/8f48w2vt International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1177/16094069211009682

13 December 2019 in Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCT. K. Corbett
T. K. Corbett
AGA. Groarke
A. Groarke
DDDeclan Devane
Declan Devane
ECE. Carr
E. Carr
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
BMBrian Mcguire
Brian Mcguire
Background: Fatigue is a common symptom in cancer patients that can persist beyond the curative treatment phase. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of psychological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors. Methods: We searched relevant online databases and sources of grey literature. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating psychological interventions in adult cancer patients after the completion of treatment, with fatigue as an outcome measure, were included. Two review authors extracted data independently from the selected studies and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Thirty-three psychological interventions were identified. The sample size of the included studies varied between 28 and 409, with 4525 participants overall. Twenty-three of the included studies reported a significant effect of the interventions on reducing fatigue in cancer survivors. Most interventions focused on psychoeducation, mindfulness, cognitive or behaviour therapy-oriented strategies. However, studies differed widely in terms of measurement tools used to assess fatigue, mode, duration and frequency of the intervention delivery. Conclusions: This review showed some tentative support for psychological interventions for fatigue after cancer treatment. However, as the RCTs were heterogeneous in nature and the number of high-quality studies was limited, definitive conclusions are not yet possible. With the growing need for stage-specific research in cancer, this review sought to inform current practice and to summarise the existing evidence base of randomised controlled trials in the area. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014015219.

1 May 2018 in Patient Preference and Adherence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEimear C Morrissey
Eimear C Morrissey
MCMonica Casey
Monica Casey
LGLiam Glynn
Liam Glynn
JWJane Walsh
Jane Walsh
GMGerard J Molloy
Gerard J Molloy
Purpose: Digital interventions, such as smartphone applications (apps), are becoming an increasingly common way to support medication adherence and self-management in chronic conditions. It is important to investigate how patients feel about and engage with these technologies. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ perspectives on smartphone apps to improve medication adherence in hypertension. Methods: This was a qualitative study based in the West of Ireland. Twenty-four patients with hypertension were purposively sampled and engaged in focus groups. Thematic analysis on the data was carried out. Results: Participants ranged in age from 50 to 83 years (M=65 years) with an equal split between men and women. Three major themes were identified in relation to patients’ perspectives on smartphone apps to improve medication adherence in hypertension: “development of digital competence,” “rules of engagement,” and “sustainability” of these technologies. Conclusion: These data showed that patients can identify the benefits of a medication reminder and recognize that self-monitoring their blood pressure could be empowering in terms of their understanding of the condition and interactions with their general practitioners. However, the data also revealed that there are concerns about increasing health-related anxiety and doubts about the sustainability of this technology over time. This suggests that the current patient perspective of smartphone apps might be best characterized by “ambivalence.”