The hepatotoxicity of drugs is the main cause of drug withdrawal from the pharmaceutical market and interruption of the development of new molecules. Biomarkers are useful in several situations. In case of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI), biomarkers can be used to confirm liver damage, its severity, prognosis, confirm drug causality, or define the type of DILI. In this review, we will first present the currently used biomarkers and candidate biomarkers for the future. The current biomarkers are certainly very helpful including with the assistance of diagnostic method such the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, but provide a limited information for the early detection of liver injury, the role of specific drug and the prediction of DILI. Some biomarkers are promising but they are not yet available for routine use. Studies are still needed to confirm their interest, particularly in comparison to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Liver toxicity occurs in up to 25% of patients treated with ICIs. The aim of our study was to describe the different clinical patterns of ICI-induced hepatitis and to assess their outcome. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury (CHILI) discussed in multidisciplinary meetings between December 2018 and March 2022 in three French centres specialised in ICI toxicity management (Montpellier, Toulouse, Lyon). The hepatitis clinical pattern was analysed by the ratio of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (R value = (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN)) for characterisation as cholestatic (R ≤2), hepatocellular (R ≥5), or mixed (2 <R <5). We included 117 patients with CHILI. The clinical pattern was hepatocellular in 38.5%, cholestatic in 36.8%, and mixed in 24.8% of patients. High-grade hepatitis severity (grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events system) was significantly associated with the hepatocellular hepatitis (p <0.05). No cases of severe acute hepatitis were reported. Liver biopsy was performed in 41.9% of patients: granulomatous lesions, endothelitis, or lymphocytic cholangitis were described. Biliary stenosis occurred in eight patients (6.8%) and was significantly more frequent in the cholestatic clinical pattern (p < 0.001). Steroids alone were mainly administered to patients with a hepatocellular clinical pattern (26.5%), and ursodeoxycholic acid was more frequently used in the cholestatic pattern (19.7%) than in the hepatocellular or mixed clinical pattern (p <0.001). Seventeen patients improved without any treatment. Among the 51 patients (43.6%) rechallenged with ICIs, 12 (23.5%) developed CHILI recurrence. This large cohort indicates the different clinical patterns of ICI-induced liver injury and highlights that the cholestatic and hepatocellular patterns are the most frequent with different outcomes. ICIs can induce hepatitis. In this retrospective series, we report 117 cases of ICI-induced hepatitis, mostly grades 3 and 4. We find a similar distribution of the different patterns of hepatitis. ICI could be resumed without systematic recurrence of hepatitis.

Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with its focus on herbal use is popular and appreciated worldwide with increased tendency, although its therapeutic efficacy is poorly established for most herbal TCM products. Treatment was perceived as fairly safe but discussions emerged more recently as to whether herb induced liver injury (HILI) from herbal TCM is a major issue; Methods: To analyze clinical and case characteristics of HILI caused by herbal TCM, we undertook a selective literature search in the PubMed database with the search items Traditional Chinese Medicine, TCM, alone and combined with the terms herbal hepatotoxicity or herb induced liver injury; Results: HILI caused by herbal TCM is rare and similarly to drugs can be caused by an unpredictable idiosyncratic or a predictable intrinsic reaction. Clinical features of liver injury from herbal TCM products are variable, and specific diagnostic biomarkers such as microsomal epoxide hydrolase, pyrrole-protein adducts, metabolomics, and microRNAs are available for only a few TCM herbs. The diagnosis is ascertained if alternative causes are validly excluded and causality levels of probable or highly probable are achieved applying the liver specific RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as the most commonly used diagnostic tool worldwide. Case evaluation may be confounded by inappropriate or lacking causality assessment, poor herbal product quality, insufficiently documented cases, and failing to exclude alternative causes such as infections by hepatotropic viruses including hepatitis E virus infections; Conclusion: Suspected cases of liver injury from herbal TCM represent major challenges that deserve special clinical and regulatory attention to improve the quality of case evaluations and ascertain patients’ safety and benefit.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) demonstrated potent and sustainable antiviral efficacy and a good safety profile in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in controlled clinical trials. Real-world data are important to confirm effectiveness and safety data in patient populations encountered in routine clinical practice.

Introduction: Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Due to its mechanism of action, potential hepatic effects of lomitapide are of clinical interest. This study aimed to determine the long‐term hepatic safety of lomitapide.Methods: Data were aggregated from the pivotal phase 3 and extension phase clinical trial with lomitapide (median 5.1 years; serum total bilirubin, transaminases, cytokeratin‐18 [CK‐18] and enhanced liver fibrosis [ELF] score, fat‐soluble vitamins and essential fatty acids), 8‐year data from the Lomitapide Observational Worldwide Evaluation Registry (LOWER) and real‐world evidence from a cohort of patients treated with lomitapide in Italy (hepatic elastography, and FIB‐4 score for hepatic fibrosis).Results: In the phase 3 trial and the LOWER registry, any asymptomatic excursions in liver transaminase levels were not associated with elevations in bilirubin, and no Hy's law cases were detected in up to 8 years follow‐up. There were no clinically relevant increases among hepatic biomarkers CK‐18, CK‐18 fragments or ELF score and fat‐soluble vitamins and essential fatty acids remained above normal levels. In 34 patients treated in Italy with lomita pide for more than 9 years, elevations in hepatic fat were mild‐to‐moderate; hepatic stiffness remained normal, and the mean FIB‐4 score remained below the fibrosis threshold value of 2.67.Conclusions: These data indicate that the hepatic safety of lomitapide remains favourable with no clinically significant elevations in hepatic biomarkers and hepatic stiffness remained normal for more than 9 years follow‐up.Phase 3 trial: NCT00730236; extension phase: NCT00943306; LOWER: NCT02135705.