Abigail Perez Ortiz

Ms. Abigail Perez Ortiz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2021 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAlberto Teixeira Penteado
Alberto Teixeira Penteado
GLGiovanna Lovato
Giovanna Lovato
AOAbigail Perez Ortiz
Abigail Perez Ortiz
Erik EscheErik Esche
Erik Esche
JRJosé Alberto Domingues Rodrigues
José Alberto Domingues Rodrigues
JRJens-Uwe Repke
Jens-Uwe Repke
Brazil’s large biofuels industry generates significant amounts of effluents, e.g., vinasse from bioethanol, that can effectively be used as substrate for production of biogas via Anaerobic Digestion (AD). The Oxidative Coupling of Methane (OCM) is the heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of methane into ethylene, which is a main building block for the chemical industry. This work investigates the potential and competitiveness of bio-ethylene production via OCM using biogas produced by biological anaerobiosis of vinasse as a feedstock. The proposed process can add incentive to treat of vinasse via AD and replace fossil ethylene, thus potentially reducing emissions of Greenhouse Gases (GHG). A process model is developed in Aspen Plus v10 software and used to design an economic Biogas-based Oxidative Coupling of Methane (Bio-OCM) process that consumes biogas and oxygen as educts and produces ethylene, ethane, and light off-gases as products. Operating conditions in the reaction section are optimized and a reaction product yield of 16.12% is reached by applying two adiabatic Packed Bed Reactors (PBRs) in series. For the downstream CO2 removal section, a standalone amine-absorption process is simulated and compared to a hybrid membrane-absorption process on an economic basis. For the distillation section, two different configurations with and without Recycle Split Vapor (RSV) are simulated and compared. The bio-ethylene production cost for a Bio-OCM plant to be installed in Brazil is estimated considering a wide range of prices for educts, utility, side products, and equipment within a Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting average production cost of bio-ethylene is 0.53 ±0.73 USD kgC2H4-1. The production cost is highly sensitive to the sales price assigned to a light off-gas side-product stream containing mostly the un-reacted methane. A sales price close to that of Brazilian pipeline natural gas has been assumed based on the characteristics of this stream. The Monte Carlo simulation shows that a bio-ethylene production cost below or equal to 0.70 USD kgC2H4-1 is achieved with a 55.2% confidence, whereas market values for fossil ethylene typically lie between 0.70USD kgC2H4-1–1.50USD kgC2H4-1. Technical and economic challenges for the industrial implementation of the proposed Bio-OCM process are identified and relevant opportunities for further research and improvement are discussed.

21 October 2025 in Methane
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTim Karsten
Tim Karsten
AOAbigail Perez Ortiz
Abigail Perez Ortiz
RSReinhard Schomäcker
Reinhard Schomäcker
JRJens-Uwe Repke
Jens-Uwe Repke
In this study, three different reactor concepts for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction are examined at the miniplant scale. Their performance and response to variations in key process parameters, such as temperature and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), are evaluated over a wide range. In addition to the conventional Packed Bed Reactor (PBR), Packed Bed Membrane Reactor (PBMR), and Chemical Looping Reactor (CLR) approaches were tested. The PBMR was realized with a porous ceramic α-Alumina membrane as air/O2 distributor. The CLR was operated in a poly-cyclic operation. Similarities of the different reactor concepts as well as layout-immanent differences with regard to changes in reaction conditions could be identified and advantages and disadvantages of the processes highlighted. The results show that C2 selectivity can be improved by both PBMR and CLR in comparison to conventional PBR, possibly reducing cost-intensive downstream units. While a PBMR can slightly improve selectivity (23%) while keeping the same conversion compared to a PBR, the use of a CLR allows for achieving exceptionally high selectivities of up to 90%. In order to address the low conversion, CLR tests were carried out with an additional O2 carrier material, which led to a significant improvement in terms of C2 yield. In addition to an evaluation and comparison of the different reactor concepts, the findings at the miniplant scale provide estimates of their potential use and scalability.

28 August 2020 in Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AOAbigail Perez Ortiz
Abigail Perez Ortiz
APA. Penteado
A. Penteado
LTL. Thum
L. Thum
TKT. Karsten
T. Karsten
EEE. Esche
E. Esche
JRJ.-U. Repke
J.-U. Repke