Hoel Letissier

Dr. Hoel Letissier

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier
JCJean Chaoui
Jean Chaoui
MBMichael J. Bercik
Michael J. Bercik
PBPascal Boileau
Pascal Boileau
DNDominique Le Nen
Dominique Le Nen
GWGilles Walch
Gilles Walch

3 June 2021 in The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSalaheddine Sta
Salaheddine Sta
JOJérôme Ogor
Jérôme Ogor
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier
ESEric Stindel
Eric Stindel
CHChafiaa Hamitouche
Chafiaa Hamitouche
GDGuillaume Dardenne
Guillaume Dardenne

4 February 2021 in Rheumatology and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier
GDGuillaume Dardenne
Guillaume Dardenne
ASAlain Saraux
Alain Saraux
DNDominique Le Nen
Dominique Le Nen
BBBhushan Borotikar
Bhushan Borotikar
SJSandrine Jousse-Joulin
Sandrine Jousse-Joulin
Introduction Ulnar tunnel syndrome at the elbow is a common pathology. The ultrasound cross-sectional area is a well-known metric widely accepted in radiology for the description of nerve entrapment. However, the pathological cut-off value remains challenging. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the ultrasound cross-sectional area measurement of the ulnar nerve at three locations, and (2) to evaluate the inter-observer reliability by two independent ultrasonographers. Methods One-hundred ulnar nerves of 50 asymptomatic individuals were scanned using B-mode and power Doppler ultrasonography. The ultrasound cross-sectional area measurements of the ulnar nerve were performed at three different levels: 2 cm proximal to the epicondyle, at the level of the epicondyle, and 2 cm distal to the epicondyle. Results In our healthy population, we found 21, 24 and 7% of ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve > 8 mm2, respectively, at three different levels of measurement and 4, 7, and 0% US-CSA ulnar nerve > 10 mm2. The intraclass correlation coefficient measured at three different site levels were good (0.7943, 0.7509) to moderate (0.5701). Conclusions Almost one-quarter of our healthy population had an ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve more than 8 mm2 and few more than 10 mm2. A cut-off of ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve measurement more than 10 mm2 could be considered as pathological. No abnormal elbow ulnar nerve vascularization has been seen. This is the first step towards normal B-mode ulnar nerve values at the elbow to further detect pathological US findings as ulnar nerve entrapment.

1 September 2021 in Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADArthur Dellestable
Arthur Dellestable
DCDamien Cheval
Damien Cheval
NKNathalie Kerfant
Nathalie Kerfant
ESEric Stindel
Eric Stindel
DNDominique Le Nen
Dominique Le Nen
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier

1 December 2019 in Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRémi Di Francia
Rémi Di Francia
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier
DNDominique Le Nen
Dominique Le Nen
CLChristian Lefèvre
Christian Lefèvre
FDFrédéric Dubrana
Frédéric Dubrana
ÉSÉric Stindel
Éric Stindel

16 December 2022 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBaptiste Montbarbon
Baptiste Montbarbon
HLHoel Letissier
Hoel Letissier
RFRémi Di Francia
Rémi Di Francia
ESEric Stindel
Eric Stindel
FDFrédéric Dubrana
Frédéric Dubrana
TWThomas Williams
Thomas Williams