The STAT1 transcription factor is activated in response to many cytokines and growth factors. To study the requirement for STAT1 in vivo, we disrupted the Stat1 gene in embryonic stem (ES) cells and in mice. Stat1(-1-)ES cells were unresponsive to interferon (IFN), but retained responsiveness to leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and remained LIF dependent for undifferentiated growth. Stat1(-1-1) animals were born at normal frequencies and displayed no gross developmental defects. However, these animals failed to thrive and were extremely susceptible to viral disease. Cells and tissues from Stat1(-1-) mice were unresponsive to IFN, but remained responsive to all other cytokines tested. Thus, STAT1 appears to be specific for IFN pathways that are essential for viability in the face of otherwise innocuous pathogens.

The accumulation of myeloid suppressor cells (MSCs) is associated with immune suppression in tumor-bearing mice and in cancer patients. The suppressive activity of MSC correlates with the expression of the myeloid markers Gr-1, CD115 (macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor), and F4/80. Gr-1⁺CD115⁺ MSCs, in addition to being able to suppress T-cell proliferation in vitro, can induce the development of Foxp3⁺ T regulatory cells (Treg) in vivo, which are anergic and suppressive. Furthermore, the secretion of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-β by Gr-1⁺CD115⁺ MSCs was induced and enhanced, respectively, on IFN-γ stimulation. The development of Treg requires antigen-associated activation of tumor-specific T cells, depends on the presence of IFN-γ and IL-10, and is independent of the nitric oxide–mediated suppressive mechanism by MSC. Our data provide evidence that Gr-1⁺CD115⁺ MSC can mediate the development of Treg in tumor-bearing mice and show a novel immune suppressive mechanism by which MSCs can suppress antitumor responses. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(2): 1123-31)

Interferon (IFN) genes are among the earliest transcriptional responses to virus infection of mammalian cells. Although the regulation of the IFNβ gene has been well characterized, the induction of the large family of IFNα genes has remained obscure. We report that the IFNα genes can be divided into two groups: an immediate‐early response gene (IFNα4) which is induced rapidly and without the need for ongoing protein synthesis; and a set of genes that display delayed induction, consisting of at least IFNα2, 5, 6 and 8, which are induced more slowly and require cellular protein synthesis. One protein that must be synthesized for induction of the delayed gene set is IFN itself, presumably IFNα4 or IFNβ, which stimulates the Jak–Stat pathway through the IFN receptor, resulting in activation of the transcription factor interferon‐stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3). Among the IFN‐stimulated genes induced through this positive feedback loop is the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) protein, IRF7. Induction of IRF7 protein in response to IFN and its subsequent activation by phosphorylation in response to virus‐specific signals, involving two C‐terminal serine residues, are required for induction of the delayed IFNα gene set.