Firas Abdollah

Dr. Firas Abdollah

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2012 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti
ALAlessandro Larcher
Alessandro Larcher
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
UCUmberto Capitanio
Umberto Capitanio
AGAndrea Gallina
Andrea Gallina
FMFrancesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi

16 October 2013 in The Prostate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
JSJonas Schiffmann
Jonas Schiffmann
VTVincent Trudeau
Vincent Trudeau
SSShahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat
MSMaxine Sun
Maxine Sun

1 January 2011 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMaxine Sun
Maxine Sun
RTRodolphe Thuret
Rodolphe Thuret
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
GLGiovanni Lughezzani
Giovanni Lughezzani
JSJan Schmitges
Jan Schmitges
PKPierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz

10 December 2014 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
RKR. Jeffrey Karnes
R. Jeffrey Karnes
NSNazareno Suardi
Nazareno Suardi
CCCesare Cozzarini
Cesare Cozzarini
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
ABAlberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti
Purpose: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in treating patients with pN1 prostate cancer is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the impact of aRT on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in these individuals is related to tumor characteristics. Methods: We evaluated 1,107 patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 1988 and 2010 at two tertiary care centers. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without aRT. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups on the basis of their tumor characteristics and the corresponding CSM rate. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between aRT and CSM rate, as well as overall mortality (OM) rate in each risk group separately. Results: Overall, 35% of patients received aRT. At multivariable analysis, aRT was associated with more favorable CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). However, when patients were stratified into risk groups, only two groups of men benefited from aRT: (1) patients with positive lymph node (PLN) count ≤ 2, Gleason score 7 to 10, pT3b/pT4 stage, or positive surgical margins (HR, 0.30; P = .002); and (2) patients with PLN count of 3 to 4 (HR, 0.21; P = .02), regardless of other tumor characteristics. These results were confirmed when OM was examined as an end point. Conclusion: The beneficial impact of aRT on survival in patients with pN1 prostate cancer is highly influenced by tumor characteristics. Men with low-volume nodal disease (≤ two PLNs) in the presence of intermediate- to high-grade, non–specimen-confined disease and those with intermediate-volume nodal disease (three to four PLNs) represent the ideal candidates for aRT after surgery.

1 June 2013 in Cancer Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
RTRodolphe Thuret
Rodolphe Thuret
JSJan Schmitges
Jan Schmitges
ZTZhe Tian
Zhe Tian
MSMaxine Sun
Maxine Sun

1 November 2017 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDeepansh Dalela
Deepansh Dalela
WJWooju Jeong
Wooju Jeong
MPMadhu-Ashni Prasad
Madhu-Ashni Prasad
ASAkshay Sood
Akshay Sood
FAFiras Abdollah
Firas Abdollah
MMMani Menon
Mani Menon