Before the wide availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART), tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease among pregnant women resulted in poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, including high rates of mother-to-child transmission of both HIV and tuberculosis. We aimed to describe the impact of tuberculosis among HIV-infected mothers on obstetric and infant outcomes in a population with access to ART. In this prospective cohort study, we followed up HIV-infected pregnant women with or without tuberculosis disease from January 2011 through January 2014 in Soweto, South Africa. Two controls were enrolled for each case patient, matched by enrollment time, maternal age, gestational age, and planned delivery clinic and followed up for 12 months after delivery. We recruited 80 case patients and 155 controls, resulting in 224 live-born infants. Infants of mothers with HIV infection and tuberculosis disease had a higher risk of low birth weight (20.8% vs 10.7%; P = .04), prolonged hospitalization at birth (51% vs 16%; P < .001), infant death (68 vs 7 deaths per 1000 births; P < .001), and tuberculosis disease (12% vs 0%; P < .001) despite appropriate maternal therapy and infant tuberculosis preventive therapy. HIV transmission was higher among these infants (4.1% vs 1.3%; P = .20), though this difference was not statistically significant. Obstetric outcomes in coinfected women were also poorer with higher risks of maternal hospitalization (25% vs 11%; P = .005) and preeclampsia (5.5% vs 0.7%; P = .03). Tuberculosis in HIV coinfected pregnant women remains a significant threat to the health of both mothers and infants. Improving tuberculosis prevention and early diagnosis among pregnant women is critical.

Tuberculosis (TB) has been a leading infectious cause of death worldwide for much of human history, with 1.6 million deaths estimated in 2017. The Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health has played an important role in understanding and responding to TB, and it has made particularly substantial contributions to prevention of TB with chemoprophylaxis. TB preventive therapy is highly efficacious in the prevention of TB disease, yet it remains underutilized by TB programs worldwide despite strong evidence to support its use in high-risk groups, such as people living with HIV and household contacts, including those under 5 years of age. We review the evidence for TB preventive therapy and discuss the future of TB prevention.

People who live in the household of someone with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis are at a high risk of tuberculosis infection and subsequent progression to tuberculosis disease. These individuals are prioritized for contact investigation and tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT). The treatment of TB infection is critical to prevent the progression of infection to disease and is prioritized in household contacts. Despite the availability of TPT, uptake in household contacts is poor. Multiple barriers prevent the optimal implementation of these policies. This manuscript lays out potential next steps for closing the policy-to-implementation gap in household contacts of all ages.

Background: Both pregnancy and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increase the risk of tuberculosis disease, which results in poor maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) reduces mortality among individuals living with HIV in high-burden settings but has recently been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes when initiated during pregnancy. Methods: In this secondary analysis, we used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between IPT exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes (fetal demise, prematurity, low birth weight, congenital anomaly) in pregnant women living with HIV enrolled as controls in the Tshepiso study, a prospective observational cohort of pregnant women living with HIV with and without tuberculosis disease in Soweto, South Africa, from 2011–2014. Results: There were 151 women enrolled with known pregnancy outcomes; 69 (46%) reported IPT initiation during pregnancy. Of the 69 IPT-exposed women, 11 (16%) had an adverse pregnancy outcome compared with 23 (28%) IPT-unexposed women. The adjusted odds of having an adverse pregnancy outcome was 2.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.0–6.5; P = .048) times higher in IPT-unexposed women compared with IPT-exposed women after controlling for maternal age, CD4 count, viral load, antiretroviral regimen, body mass index, and anemia. Conclusions: IPT exposure during pregnancy was not negatively associated with pregnancy outcomes after controlling for demographic, clinical, and HIV-related factors. These results provide some reassurance that IPT can be safely used in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Additional research is needed to evaluate the safety of IPT and new short-course tuberculosis preventive therapies during pregnancy.