The clinical importance of tumor-infiltrating cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) T cells is incompletely understood in early breast cancer. We investigated the clinical significance of CD4, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and B cell attracting chemokine leukocyte chemoattractant-ligand (C-X-C motif) 13 (CXCL13) in early breast cancer. The study is based on the patient population of the randomized FinHer trial, where 1010 patients with early breast cancer were randomly allocated to adjuvant chemotherapy containing either docetaxel or vinorelbine, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients were also allocated to trastuzumab or no trastuzumab. Breast cancer CD4, FOXP3, and CXCL13 contents were evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and their influence on distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was examined using univariable and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates in the entire cohort and in selected molecular subgroups. Interactions between variables were analyzed using Cox regression. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subset of the HE10/97 randomized trial was used for confirmation. High CXCL13 was associated with favorable DDFS in univariable analysis, and independently in multivariable analysis (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.67, P ≤ 0.001), most strongly in TNBC (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19–0.79, P = 0.009). No significant interaction with chemotherapy or trastuzumab administration was detected. Neither tumor CD4 content nor FOXP3 content was associated with DDFS. The favorable prognostic influence of CXCL13 was confirmed in the HE10/97 trial patient population with TNBC (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09–0.93; P = 0.038). The results provide a high level of evidence that humoral immunity influences the survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer, in particular of those with TNBC. The study reports retrospective biomarker analyses in the prospective FinHer trial and the prospective HE10/97 trial. ISRCTN76560285 . Registered on 18 March 2005. ACTRN12611000506998 . Registered on 16 May 2011.

Background: Only little is known about the psychosocial aspects of breast cancer patients after mastectomy with immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Methods: We systematically screened PubMed using the following key words: mastectomy, immediate vs. delayed reconstruction, psychosocial aspects and quality of life. To highlight different psychological outcomes, studies were categorized into those describing: anxiety, depression, body image and satisfaction with the surgical outcome. We also compared patients after mastectomy alone with those undergoing immediate or delayed reconstruction. Results: Methodologies and psychological outcomes varied among the identified studies, making it difficult to compare results. There are contradictory outcomes concerning the psychosocial aspects of breast cancer patients after mastectomy alone compared with those who underwent an immediate or delayed reconstruction following mastectomy. Some studies show that immediate reconstruction after mastectomy had a positive impact on patients' psychological well-being. In contrast, other studies indicated that in the long-term view the compared patient groups were very similar concerning psychosocial aspects. Conclusion: Analyzing different aspects of psychosocial well-being after breast cancer surgery, there might be an advantage in choosing immediate reconstruction, if oncological safety allows it.

Interferons are crucial for adaptive immunity and play an important role in the immune landscape of breast cancer. Using microarray-based gene expression analysis, we examined the subtype-specific prognostic significance of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) as a single gene as well as an IFN-γ signature covering the signaling pathway in 461 breast cancer patients. Prognostic significance of IFN-γ, as well as the IFN-γ signature for metastasis-free survival (MFS), were examined using Kaplan–Meier as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in the whole cohort and in different molecular subtypes. The independent prognostic significance of IFN-γ as a single gene was limited to basal-like breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 2.779, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.117–6.919, p = 0.028). In contrast, the IFN-γ-associated gene signature was an independent prognostic factor in the whole cohort (HR 2.287, 95% CI 1.410–3.633, p < 0.001) as well as in the basal-like (HR 3.458, 95% CI 1.154–10.359, p = 0.027) and luminal B (HR 2.690, 95% CI 1.416–5.112, p = 0.003) molecular subtypes. These results underline the subtype-dependent prognostic influence of the immune system in early breast cancer.

We examined differences in HER2 expression between primary tumors and distant metastases, particularly within the HER2-negative primary breast cancer cohort (HER2-low and HER2-zero). The retrospective study included 191 consecutive paired samples of primary breast cancer and distant metastases diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. HER2-negative samples were divided into HER2-zero (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 0) and HER2-low (IHC score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-negative). The main objective was to analyze the discordance rate between matched primary and metastatic samples, focusing on the site of distant metastasis, molecular subtype, and de novo metastatic breast cancer. The relationship was determined by cross-tabulation and calculation of Cohen′s Kappa coefficient. The final study cohort included 148 paired samples. The largest proportion in the HER2-negative cohort was HER2-low [primary tumor 61.4% (n = 78), metastatic samples 73.5% (n = 86)]. The discordance rate between the HER2 status of primary tumors and corresponding distant metastases was 49.6% (n = 63) (Kappa −0.003, 95%CI −0.15–0.15). Development of a HER2-low phenotype occurred most frequently (n = 52, 40.9%), mostly with a switch from HER2-zero to HER2-low (n = 34, 26.8%). Relevant HER2 discordance rates were observed between different metastatic sites and molecular subtypes. Primary metastatic breast cancer had a significantly lower HER2 discordance rate than secondary metastatic breast cancer [30.2% (Kappa 0.48, 95%CI 0.27–0.69) versus 50.5% (Kappa 0.14, 95% CI −0.03–0.32)]. This highlights the importance of evaluating potentially therapy-relevant discordance rates between a primary tumor and corresponding distant metastases.