This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
The growing interest in the enhancement, management, and sale of public building stock has increased the importance of their valuation and, as a result, the need to identify suitable methods for estimating value that take into account their peculiarities. They often boast architectural features (interfloor distance, layout, finishings, types of wiring/heating systems, etc.) that make them ‘extraordinary’ assets; in some cases, these features also endow them with monumental and/or historical importance. Thus, when valuating, it is necessary to adopt suitable methods. Where comparable examples or income-based parameters specifically concerning buildings with special features are lacking, the Depreciated Replacement Cost (DRC) method is the only system that can be used to estimate their market value. This paper aims to show how the DRC method can be applied in this specific market. The theoretical part will be coupled with a practical section where the DRC method will be used to estimate the market value of an extraordinary landmark building in Rome (Italy), the Palazzo degli Archivi di Stato (the State Archives building), in the EUR district, sold by EUR S.p.A. group (formerly known as Ente EUR) in 2015.
Enrico Fattinnanzi; Giovanna Acampa; Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo; Fabiana Forte. Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8993 .
AMA StyleEnrico Fattinnanzi, Giovanna Acampa, Fabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo, Fabiana Forte. Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (21):8993.
Chicago/Turabian StyleEnrico Fattinnanzi; Giovanna Acampa; Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo; Fabiana Forte. 2020. "Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data." Sustainability 12, no. 21: 8993.
The growing interest in issues to do with the administration, enhancement and sale of public building stock has increased the need for their valuation and, as a result, has increasingly highlighted the need to identify suitable methods for estimating value that take into account the peculiarities of public buildings. In Italy, public buildings often boast ‘special’ architectural features (interfloor distance, layout, finishings, type of wiring/heating systems, etc.) that render them ‘extra-ordinary’ assets; in some cases, these features also confer grand and/or historical importance to such buildings. Thus when carrying out valuation work in Italy, it is necessary to adopt suitable valuation methods designed for buildings boasting special features prior to drafting any administration plans, enhancement projects or even plans for the sale of public building stock. Given the lack of comparable examples or income-based parameters specifically concerning buildings with special features, the Cost Approach is the only method that can be used to estimate the market value of such properties. This paper aims to identify the ways the Cost Approach can be applied when estimating the market value of properties with special features that fall into the ‘extra-ordinary’ category. The theoretical part will be supported by a practical section where the Cost Approach will be used to estimate the market value of an extra-ordinary landmark building in the EUR district: the “Palazzo della Scienza Universale”, previously owned by the EUR S.p.A. company (formerly known as the Ente EUR), which was recently sold (2015).
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. The Assessment of Public Buildings with Special Architectural Features Using the Cost Approach. A Case Study: A Building Sold by EUR S.p.A. in Rome. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 2020, 12251, 869 -883.
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo. The Assessment of Public Buildings with Special Architectural Features Using the Cost Approach. A Case Study: A Building Sold by EUR S.p.A. in Rome. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV. 2020; 12251 ():869-883.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. 2020. "The Assessment of Public Buildings with Special Architectural Features Using the Cost Approach. A Case Study: A Building Sold by EUR S.p.A. in Rome." Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 12251, no. : 869-883.
At the European level, the exercise of building rights on areas that general planning tools have considered to be buildable is allowed only upon the issuance of a specific building permit. The legal procedures used to obtain the above-mentioned building permit can be largely affected by some constrains able to limit—and occasionally prevent—the exercise of the building rights (even if they are established by a general planning tool). Therefore, in the evaluation of buildable areas without building permit, the uncertainty relating to the presence of constraints/limitations that require a specific authorization issued by the competent authorities need to be considered as a part of the urban risk. This article is thus based on the assumption that to assess buildable area without building permits must be considered as the actual condition it is found in, and therefore its limitations and the time necessary for the building to be built actually and not just “potential”. To implement this approach, a model for determining a discount rate in market value of buildable areas subject to restrictions (limitations and constraints) has been structured.
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. A Model for Determining a Discount Rate in Market Value Assessment of Buildable Areas Subject to Restrictions. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions 2020, 303 -314.
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo. A Model for Determining a Discount Rate in Market Value Assessment of Buildable Areas Subject to Restrictions. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. 2020; ():303-314.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. 2020. "A Model for Determining a Discount Rate in Market Value Assessment of Buildable Areas Subject to Restrictions." Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions , no. : 303-314.
According to Italian legislation for a particular type of real property—lands/areas subject to buildability, but not yet currently buildable—there is a problem related to their “qualification”, or whether or not they must be considered buildable for the purposes of their recurrent taxation. These potentially buildable (POBU) areas, that were previously zoned as “agricultural”, have been rezoned as “general urban planning instruments/regulations” (the General Urban Development Plans or variances, which regulate land governance), whose approval path has yet to be concluded. Their value—the taxable base underpinning their taxation—clearly depends on their qualification (whether or not they are considered buildable). This has produced, in recent years, several disputes between owners and local governments; the law did not give univocal solutions: Today (2019), there is a conflict of case law in relation to considering these areas as being building areas, as it is not clear what estimating procedures should be used. This article is thus based on the assumption that responding to the problems connected with taxing POBU areas must be considered separately from (overcoming, in this way, conflicting case law) the “virtual” qualification of agricultural or buildable area, but must instead, and more simply, be considered as the actual condition it is found in (likelihood of having building potential in the future), and therefore its limitations (present at the time of taxation) and the time necessary for the building to actually be built and not just “potential”. The approach proposed in this article thus offers a solution to the problem that has been raised, by modifying the current de jure approach (defining the moment when the building right is manifested) towards an assessment/appraisal approach (defining the value of the potentially buildable (POBU) area, in relation to its actual conditions). To implement this approach, a methodology—proposing an upgrade of the traditional analytic procedure for the assessment of transformation value has been structured in a way such that consideration may be made of the components characterizing the potentially buildable areas by means of appropriate assessment parameters that go towards forming these areas’ value: These are the market value discount rate of the POBU area in relation to the uncertainty and risk of reaching effective and concrete buildability, and the estimated time needed to complete the procedural path for making the area actually buildable.
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo; Fabiana Forte. A Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Potentially Buildable Land for Tax Purposes: The Italian Case Study. Land 2020, 9, 8 .
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo, Fabiana Forte. A Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Potentially Buildable Land for Tax Purposes: The Italian Case Study. Land. 2020; 9 (1):8.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo; Fabiana Forte. 2020. "A Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Potentially Buildable Land for Tax Purposes: The Italian Case Study." Land 9, no. 1: 8.
In the European Union, real estate initiatives involving public–private partnerships (PPPs) are characterized by the payment of a charge, which is generally used for public purposes (and works). In Italy, since the 1990s, PPPs have also been used to start negotiated initiatives giving the possibility of modifying town planning forecasts. Such initiatives are aimed at increasing the value of private properties and, through the charge, financing public works. This charge was regulated only in 2014 with the change of Article 16, paragraph 4, point d-ter of the Presidential Decree 380/2001 (Consolidated building law) and was named the “extraordinary urbanization contribution” (or simply the “extraordinary contribution”). The extraordinary contribution makes it possible to finance public works with private monetary resources. The amount of the extraordinary contribution is not less than 50% of the capital gain that is produced by real estate initiatives concerning modifications to town planning forecasts. A crucial issue of the this kind of PPPs has always been the appraisal of the capital gain of real estate initiatives due to changes in town planning forecasts. The factors to be considered while evaluating the extraordinary contribution, the appraisal tools and procedures to be used in assessing the capital gain are not indicated at regulatory level. However, an over 20 years’ practice has been consolidating the use of an analytical procedure for the appraisal of the transformation value to be used in evaluating the extraordinary contribution. In this procedure, the evaluation of the profitability index of real estate initiatives appears critical: in fact, the capital gain depends upon this element. At the same time, this topic is substantially neglected by the scientific debate. In this paper, a methodology has been defined, which is structured on the Build-Up Method and allows the profitability index (or rate of return) of a real estate initiative to be evaluated. Through a test, the developed methodology has been used in a case study: the appraisal of the extraordinary contribution in three integrated intervention programs in the city of Rome.
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1371 .
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo. A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (5):1371.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. 2019. "A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome." Sustainability 11, no. 5: 1371.
The exceptional contribution of urbanisation (hereinafter simply exceptional contribution) is a regulatory obligation that represents an additional to the costs of primary and secondary urbanisation, at least equal to 50% of the greater value generated by projects in areas or buildings with modifications to town planning. The rule that introduced the exceptional contribution does not indicate the factors to be considered while evaluating the exceptional contribution, and consequently does not address the evaluation procedure to be used in determining its exact form. In this paper, an idea will be proposed regarding the urban development exceptional contribution as it has been applied in Italy both in regional regulations and in various Local Authorities. From this overview, the approach of the different LAs can be seen. Each has autonomously decided upon the adoption of an analytical procedure to estimate the Transformation Value to calculate the extra contribution. Subsequently, in light of the result of not considering a specific rate of return during the estimation of the exceptional contribution, a procedure is proposed for determining the rate of return to be considered in the indirect analytical procedure for estimating the Value of Transformation used to calculate the exceptional urbanisation contribution. The proposed procedure is based on the Build-up Method and will take the form of its operational declination, to be used when one has the coefficients representative of the areas of risk for the different factors that are typical of interventions of settlement transformation. To test the proposed procedure it has been applied to a case study: the evaluation of exceptional contribution in an Integrated Intervention Program in the Municipality of Grottaferrata (RM).
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. A Procedure for Determining the Industrial Profitability of Settlement Interventions in the Appraisal of Exceptional Contribution of Urbanisation. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 2018, 34 -50.
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo. A Procedure for Determining the Industrial Profitability of Settlement Interventions in the Appraisal of Exceptional Contribution of Urbanisation. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV. 2018; ():34-50.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. 2018. "A Procedure for Determining the Industrial Profitability of Settlement Interventions in the Appraisal of Exceptional Contribution of Urbanisation." Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV , no. : 34-50.
Following the events of the still unfolding economic and financial crisis involving real estate, there has been a growing awareness of having to formulate proposals and scenarios (in real estate) that have the characteristics of socially responsible investments; therefore, in line with the papal Encyclical Laudato Si’, these proposals and scenarios must aim at growth based on a development that is “sustainable”, both environmentally and socially. Settlement production processes are starting to be carried out in the form of “Impact Investments”, responsible investments related to ethical finance. Based on these premises, this paper will: (i) briefly analyze the nature of an “Impact Investment” and what characterizes and sets it apart from “Traditional Investments”; (ii) then, based on the analyses made, it will be possible to identify the elements for formulating a procedure (of the multicriteria type) aimed at assessing an “Impact Investment” in real estate. Lastly, the procedure will be applied to a case study involving a social-housing initiative in the Municipality of Ladispoli (Rome).
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. “Impact Investments” in Real Estate: Opportunities and Appraisal. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions 2018, 579 -592.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti, Anthea Chiovitti. “Impact Investments” in Real Estate: Opportunities and Appraisal. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. 2018; ():579-592.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. 2018. "“Impact Investments” in Real Estate: Opportunities and Appraisal." Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions , no. : 579-592.
Real estate and land management are characterised by a complex, elaborate combination of technical, regulatory and governmental factors. In Europe, Public Administrators must address the complex decision-making problems that need to be resolved, while also acting in consideration of the expectations of the different stakeholders involved in settlement transformation. In complex situations (e.g., with different aspects to be considered and multilevel actors involved), decision-making processes are often used to solve multidisciplinary and multidimensional analyses, which support the choices of those who are making the decision. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods are included among the examination and evaluation techniques considered useful by the European Community. Such analyses and techniques are performed using methods, which aim to reach a synthesis of the various forms of input data needed to define decision-making problems of a similar complexity. Thus, one or more of the conclusions reached allow for informed, well thought-out, strategic decisions. According to the technical literature on MCDA, numerous methods are applicable in different decision-making situations, however, advice for selecting the most appropriate for the specific field of application and problem have not been thoroughly investigated. In land and real estate management, numerous queries regarding evaluations often arise. In brief, the objective of this paper is to outline a procedure with which to select the method best suited to the specific queries of evaluation, which commonly arise while addressing decision-making problems. In particular issues of land and real estate management, representing the so-called “settlement sector”. The procedure will follow a theoretical-methodological approach by formulating a taxonomy of the endogenous and exogenous variables of the multi-criteria analysis methods.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes. Sustainability 2018, 10, 507 .
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti, Anthea Chiovitti. A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (2):507.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. 2018. "A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes." Sustainability 10, no. 2: 507.
In Europe, the operating context in which initiatives of settlement transformation are currently initiated is characterized by a complex, elaborate combination of technical, regulatory and governance-related factors. A similar set of considerations makes it necessary to address the complex decision-making problems to be resolved through multidisciplinary, comparative approaches designed to rationalize the process and treat the elements to be considered in systematic fashion with respect to the range of alternatives available as solutions. Within a context defined in this manner, decision-making processes must often be used to obtain multidisciplinary and multidimensional analyses to support the choices made by the decision-makers. Such analyses are carried out using multi-criteria tools designed to arrive at syntheses of the numerous forms of input data needed to describe decision-making problems of similar complexity, so that one or more outcomes of the synthesis make possible informed, well thought-out, strategic decisions. The technical literature on the topic proposes numerous tools of multi-criteria analysis for application in different decision-making contexts. Still, no specific contributions have been drawn up to date on the approach to take in selecting the tool best suited to providing adequate responses to the queries of evaluation that arise most frequently in the various fields of application, and especially in the settlement sector. The objective of this paper is to propose, by formulating a taxonomy of the endogenous and exogenous variables of tools of multi-criteria analysis, a methodology capable of selecting the tool best suited to the queries of evaluation which arise regarding the chief categories of decision-making problems, and particularly in the settlement sector.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. Public Initiatives of Settlement Transformation: A Theoretical-Methodological Approach to Selecting Tools of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Buildings 2017, 8, 1 .
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti, Anthea Chiovitti. Public Initiatives of Settlement Transformation: A Theoretical-Methodological Approach to Selecting Tools of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Buildings. 2017; 8 (1):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Anthea Chiovitti. 2017. "Public Initiatives of Settlement Transformation: A Theoretical-Methodological Approach to Selecting Tools of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis." Buildings 8, no. 1: 1.
The acknowledgment of the ongoing economic and financial crisis involving real estate, creates the need to formulate proposals and scenarios (in real estate) with the characteristics of socially responsible investments. These kind of investments aim towards “sustainable” development both environmentally (safeguarding the shortage of resources such as land, energy, and natural elements), and socially (protecting the population and raising its level of well-being) according to so-called “ethical finance”, instead of a mere “speculative” investment. Effectively, real estate is still an investment sector only marginally explored by the socially-responsible funds. Based on these premises, this paper will: (i) briefly analyze the nature of socially-responsible investments, setting their characteristics apart from “traditional investments”; and (ii) propose a possible procedure (of the multi-criteria type) which aims to assess socially-responsible investments in real estate. This will be applied to a case study regarding a social housing initiative in the municipality of Anguillara Sabazia (Rome, Italy).
Fabrizio Battisti; Maria Rosaria Guarini; Anthea Chiovitti. The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds. Sustainability 2017, 9, 973 .
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Maria Rosaria Guarini, Anthea Chiovitti. The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds. Sustainability. 2017; 9 (6):973.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Maria Rosaria Guarini; Anthea Chiovitti. 2017. "The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds." Sustainability 9, no. 6: 973.
The effects of the world economic and financial crisis, which began in 2007 and is still in progress, has made increasingly sharp the line of demarcation between those able to access home ownership on the free market, and those unable to do so. For the European Union’s member states, Social Housing (SH) policies include all the initiatives aimed at providing housing support for all the weak segments of the population; these policies have declined differently by different Member States according to their specific needs. In Italy, the growing need for SH accommodation together with the shortage of public resources makes developing forms of Public–Private Partnership (PPP) necessary. Evaluation techniques like Break-Even Analysis and Contribution Margin Analysis are useful in planning interventions including SH initiatives in the context of real estate development or retraining initiatives in PPP (in negotiation processes or in project financing). These kinds of techniques especially allow evaluation of public and private convenience in PPP. In the present work, an assessment procedure has been structured: first the main parameters of a settlement of SH initiative in PPP are defined; subsequently, it is possible to assess the feasibility and the financial balance of the initiative itself. The procedure has been applied to a case study: the interrupted initiative of self-renovation in Via Grotta Perfetta 315 in Rome (Italy).
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. A Model to Assess the Feasibility of Public–Private Partnership for Social Housing. Buildings 2017, 7, 44 .
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti. A Model to Assess the Feasibility of Public–Private Partnership for Social Housing. Buildings. 2017; 7 (4):44.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. 2017. "A Model to Assess the Feasibility of Public–Private Partnership for Social Housing." Buildings 7, no. 4: 44.
'Public interest' has always been a necessary and unavoidable condition in Public-Private Partnership negotiated-type (PPPN), introduced in the Italian law in 1992. However, only in 2014 that the meaning of public interest has been clarified through art. 17.1 letter g) of Law no. 164'2014, by matching it with an extraordinary contribute of urbanisation. In this law the extraordinary contribution is defined by taking into account only the purely financial criteria. Instead, European Directives and case law reaffirmed the multi-dimensional connotation of public interest. The aim of this work is the construction of an evaluation multi-criteria procedure enabling a municipality to evaluate the public interest of a PPPN initiative, by considering heterogeneous financial, procedural, socio-economic, environmental, technical components. The procedure is applicable in the European context where PPPN shall apply; to test its operational capacity it will be applied to a case study: the Integrated Action Programme in Mentana (RM).
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 2017, 7, 54 .
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti. Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making. 2017; 7 (1):54.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. 2017. "Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership." International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 7, no. 1: 54.
'Public interest' has always been a necessary and unavoidable condition in Public-Private Partnership negotiated-type (PPPN), introduced in the Italian law in 1992. However, only in 2014 that the meaning of public interest has been clarified through art. 17.1 letter g) of Law no. 164'2014, by matching it with an extraordinary contribute of urbanisation. In this law the extraordinary contribution is defined by taking into account only the purely financial criteria. Instead, European Directives and case law reaffirmed the multi-dimensional connotation of public interest. The aim of this work is the construction of an evaluation multi-criteria procedure enabling a municipality to evaluate the public interest of a PPPN initiative, by considering heterogeneous financial, procedural, socio-economic, environmental, technical components. The procedure is applicable in the European context where PPPN shall apply; to test its operational capacity it will be applied to a case study: the Integrated Action Programme in Mentana (RM).
Fabrizio Battisti; Maria Rosaria Guarini. Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 2017, 7, 54 .
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Maria Rosaria Guarini. Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making. 2017; 7 (1):54.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Maria Rosaria Guarini. 2017. "Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership." International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 7, no. 1: 54.
In Italy, tax base for “Imposta Municipale Unica” related to the building area - made such by General Plan or its General Variation adopted but not approved - is the value (of the same building area) depending on the building potential of prediction even if not immediately exercisable. However, the building rights can be exercised only after: (i) the final approval of the General Plan/General Variation; (ii) the approval of the Implementation Plan required by Law; (iii) the issuance of certificates of permission building. This has produced in recent years several disputes between owners and local governments; the law did not give univocal solutions: today (2015) there is a conflict of case law relating to consider this areas absolutely as building areas, as well as it isn’t defined what estimating procedures should be used. In this paper, through the application of a model of financial mathematics, an approach that overcomes the conflict law related to the appraisal of the building areas included in General Plans/General Variation adopted but not yet approved, is proposed: the appraisal will be performed in relation to the time and variables between the time of the appraisal and the time (alleged) for the completion of the administrative procedure for obtaining authorizations to build.
Fabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. The Appraisal of Buildable Land for Property Taxation in the Adopted General Municipal Plan. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 2016, 22 -32.
AMA StyleFabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo. The Appraisal of Buildable Land for Property Taxation in the Adopted General Municipal Plan. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV. 2016; ():22-32.
Chicago/Turabian StyleFabrizio Battisti; Orazio Campo. 2016. "The Appraisal of Buildable Land for Property Taxation in the Adopted General Municipal Plan." Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV , no. : 22-32.
In the forecasts related to air traffic in the period 2015-2030, as worldwide as in Italy, is expected a substantial increase in air traffic individual. In Italy, the development and increase of “individual” air traffic is closely linked to the construction of a network of second-level airport infrastructures for civil aviation (minor airports), suitably distributed throughout the national territory, efficient, accessible, interconnected with other means of transport and easy-to-use. A network structured in this way can also contribute to the improvement of the conditions of the context of peripheral areas. The model of multi-criteria analysis proposed is aimed to identify useful elements for supporting the choices needed to redefine Italy’s minor airport system so as to construct a second-level airport infrastructure network (nodes of a so-called “highway in the sky”) integrated with the general airport and infrastructure system and aimed at supporting local sustainable development of the different areas of Italy.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Claudia Buccarini; Anthea Chiovitti. A Model of Multi-criteria Analysis to Develop Italy’s Minor Airport System. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 2015, 162 -177.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti, Claudia Buccarini, Anthea Chiovitti. A Model of Multi-criteria Analysis to Develop Italy’s Minor Airport System. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV. 2015; ():162-177.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Claudia Buccarini; Anthea Chiovitti. 2015. "A Model of Multi-criteria Analysis to Develop Italy’s Minor Airport System." Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV , no. : 162-177.
This paper describes a methodology for analyzing the feasibility of a system of minor airports designed to increase the use of air travel for short trips in Italy. The study starts with an analysis of Italian territory and the positioning of its minor airports; the database of the Geographical Information System (GIS) provided by Italy’s National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) is sued to describe the country’s main geographical and economic features. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is developed for processing the dataset and creating a platform shared by all stakeholders. Thanks to the Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis (SDSS) arrived at, it is possible to localize the best position for new minor airports and to formulate strategies for improving existing ones.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Marco Locurcio; Fabrizio Battisti. GIS-Based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for the “Highway in the Sky”. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV 2015, 146 -161.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Marco Locurcio, Fabrizio Battisti. GIS-Based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for the “Highway in the Sky”. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV. 2015; ():146-161.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Marco Locurcio; Fabrizio Battisti. 2015. "GIS-Based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for the “Highway in the Sky”." Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV , no. : 146-161.
The growing scarcity of public financial in Italy, in opposition of the more significant problems of degradation of many urban areas, prompted the Legislature to standardise new processes of settlement transformation based on negotiation-type public-private partnerships (PPPN). However, these standards have not provided for benchmarks referring to the contents of partnerships or assessment procedures aimed at assessing the initiatives undertaken with respect to public utility objectives. This has often led to redevelopment initiatives geared more towards the satisfaction of private rather than public interests. The proposed methodology, structured on the integration of a benchmarking process with multi-criteria evaluation techniques known as benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation (BME) enables the definition of benchmarks through a participatory process of the different stakeholders involved in a PPPN to which the BME is applied. In order to verify the applicability of the proposed procedure, it has been applied to a type of PPPN: the integrated action programmes (PII) in the Lazio Region. The benchmarks can be used by Lazio's administrators both for renewing the planning of the PII concerned and for verifying the quality of the initiatives within the same PPPN process.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. Benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation methodology's application for the definition of benchmarks in a negotiation-type public-private partnership. A case of study: the integrated action programmes of the Lazio Region. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 2014, 9, 271 .
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti. Benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation methodology's application for the definition of benchmarks in a negotiation-type public-private partnership. A case of study: the integrated action programmes of the Lazio Region. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining. 2014; 9 (4):271.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. 2014. "Benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation methodology's application for the definition of benchmarks in a negotiation-type public-private partnership. A case of study: the integrated action programmes of the Lazio Region." International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 9, no. 4: 271.
In Italy, during the last few years (2008-2013), the processes of land development have stalled due to the economic and political situation of the Country. The lack of public resources available to enable the above mentioned processes, as well as a complex and incomplete legislative and regulatory framework are the main causes of the crisis affecting the construction industry. This industry, which has always assured a turnover of 20% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), should be revived through the development of public-private partnerships (PPP). This paper shows a working model of participatory management, based on PPP, which meets the purpose of supporting public administrations (PA) in a more efficient management of their lands development processes. The proposed model, inspired by the urban management experience developed in the city of Ladispoli (a best practise example), is based on European and International procedural and evaluation models. The models aim is to achieve public-interest objectives, within an articulated development initiative, based on a complex planning vision that involves a plurality of purposes, interventions, actors.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. Evaluation and Management of Land-Development Processes Based on the Public-Private Partnership. Advanced Materials Research 2013, 869-870, 154 -161.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti. Evaluation and Management of Land-Development Processes Based on the Public-Private Partnership. Advanced Materials Research. 2013; 869-870 ():154-161.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. 2013. "Evaluation and Management of Land-Development Processes Based on the Public-Private Partnership." Advanced Materials Research 869-870, no. : 154-161.
The global economic crisis has caused a sharp contraction in many Italian productive sectors, with the construction industry experiencing a decline of about 22% over the last few years (2009-2013). In the residential property market, sale prices for houses have fallen by 40% and rental prices by 30% [. Despite a greater supply of housing at lower prices, there remains a significant demand for low-cost housing from lower-middle-income families, young couples, single-parent families and from non-resident and foreign university students. This is also due to the lack of public resources to create substantial policies to support social housing construction. Social Housing (SH) programmes, with joint financial support from public and private stakeholders, are aimed at responding to the demand for accommodation for rent at social rates, for sale at concessionary prices and/or for rent (with or without redemption) at controlled rates. At the same time, especially in large cities, there is a continuing need to initiate processes for the redevelopment of numerous public and private residential building complexes in brownfield sites that have become functionally obsolete and dilapidated. The implementation of urban and building redevelopment programmes in this situation requires the definition of management models and methods for assessing the financial sustainability of such programmes. This article, based on a contextual analysis of these market segments, outlines a methodological approach, tested on a restructuring proposal for the Corviale (Rome) building-city housing development, to assess the financial sustainability of redevelopment projects on brownfield sites, providing a new range of functions that include housing, student residences and services.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. Social Housing and Redevelopment of Building Complexes on Brownfield Sites: The Financial Sustainability of Residential Projects for Vulnerable Social Groups. Advanced Materials Research 2013, 869-870, 3 -13.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti. Social Housing and Redevelopment of Building Complexes on Brownfield Sites: The Financial Sustainability of Residential Projects for Vulnerable Social Groups. Advanced Materials Research. 2013; 869-870 ():3-13.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti. 2013. "Social Housing and Redevelopment of Building Complexes on Brownfield Sites: The Financial Sustainability of Residential Projects for Vulnerable Social Groups." Advanced Materials Research 869-870, no. : 3-13.
In 2009 the Municipality of Rome (MR) started a re-qualification program for the street markets through the use of public-private partnership (PPP). This program concerns strategic areas and buildings within the city of Rome, including the Flaminio II street market located in Via Guido Reni in the Flaminio district. In summary, this paper intends to: i) examine the Flaminio II market pre-feasibility project elaborated by MR; ii) with reference to the PPP regulatory framework, show a further proposal to be compared with the proposal by MR. This further proposal represents the first alternative solution, drawn up in order to guarantee that following PPPs concerning street markets are approved by MR; it will be implemented in a concerted way, which will take into account the actual needs of the local stakeholders.
Maria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Claudia Buccarini. Rome: Re-Qualification Program for the Street Markets in Public-Private Partnership. A Further Proposal for the Flaminio II Street Market. Advanced Materials Research 2013, 838-841, 2928 -2933.
AMA StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti, Claudia Buccarini. Rome: Re-Qualification Program for the Street Markets in Public-Private Partnership. A Further Proposal for the Flaminio II Street Market. Advanced Materials Research. 2013; 838-841 ():2928-2933.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaria Rosaria Guarini; Fabrizio Battisti; Claudia Buccarini. 2013. "Rome: Re-Qualification Program for the Street Markets in Public-Private Partnership. A Further Proposal for the Flaminio II Street Market." Advanced Materials Research 838-841, no. : 2928-2933.