Xiaoping WANG

Dr. Xiaoping WANG

Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaoping WANGXiaoping WANG
Xiaoping WANG
Fei ZhangFei Zhang
Fei Zhang
HKHsiang-Te Kung
Hsiang-Te Kung
VJVerner Carl Johnson
Verner Carl Johnson

1 February 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaoping WANGXiaoping WANG
Xiaoping WANG
Fei ZhangFei Zhang
Fei Zhang
JDJianli Ding
Jianli Ding
HKHsiang-Te Kung
Hsiang-Te Kung
ALAamir Latif
Aamir Latif
VJVerner C. Johnson
Verner C. Johnson

9 October 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xiaoping WANGXiaoping WANG
Xiaoping WANG
Fei ZhangFei Zhang
Fei Zhang
JDJianli Ding
Jianli Ding
The water quality index (WQI) has been used to identify threats to water quality and to support better water resource management. This study combines a machine learning algorithm, WQI, and remote sensing spectral indices (difference index, DI; ratio index, RI; and normalized difference index, NDI) through fractional derivatives methods and in turn establishes a model for estimating and assessing the WQI. The results show that the calculated WQI values range between 56.61 and 2,886.51. We also explore the relationship between reflectance data and the WQI. The number of bands with correlation coefficients passing a significance test at 0.01 first increases and then decreases with a peak appearing after 1.6 orders. WQI and DI as well as RI and NDI correlation coefficients between optimal band combinations of the peak also appear after 1.6 orders with R2 values of 0.92, 0.58 and 0.92. Finally, 22 WQI estimation models were established by POS-SVR to compare the predictive effects of these models. The models based on a spectral index of 1.6 were found to perform much better than the others, with an R2 of 0.92, an RMSE of 58.4, and an RPD of 2.81 and a slope of curve fitting of 0.97.

1 August 2017 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaoping WANGXiaoping WANG
Xiaoping WANG
Fei ZhangFei Zhang
Fei Zhang
HKHsiang-Te Kung
Hsiang-Te Kung
AGAbduwasit Ghulam
Abduwasit Ghulam
ATAdam L. Trumbo
Adam L. Trumbo
YJYunqing Jing
Yunqing Jing