Aims: The aim of this study was to identify the information topics that should be addressed according to the parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in the diagnostic and treatment phase during the first year of life. Second, we explored parental recommendations to further optimize the information provision in DDH care.Methods: A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted between September and December 2020. A purposive sample of parents of children aged younger than one year, who were treated for DDH with a Pavlik harness, were interviewed until data saturation was achieved. A total of 20 interviews with 22 parents were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, independently reviewed, and coded into categories and themes.Results: Interviews revealed four fundamental information topics that should be addressed in the different phases of the DDH healthcare trajectory: general information (screening phase), patient-specific information (diagnostic and treatment phase), practical information (treatment phase), and future perspectives (treatment and follow-up phase). To further optimize the information provision in DDH care, parents wished for more accessible and trustworthy general information prior to the first hospital visit to be better prepared for the diagnosis. Furthermore, parents wanted more personalized and visually supported information for a better understanding of the nature of the disease and the reason for treatment.Conclusion: This study offers novel insights to optimize the information provision in DDH care. The main finding is the shift in information need from general information in the screening phase to patient-specific information in the diagnostic and treatment phase of DDH. Parents prefer visually-supported information, provided in a timely fashion, and tailored to their child’s situation. These recommendations potentially decrease parental anxiety, insecurity, confusion, and increase parental empowerment and treatment adherence throughout the diagnostic and treatment phase of DDH.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):496–506.

Introduction Up to one-third of patients with cerebral palsy (CP) develop hip migration. Current standard care for early hip migration is bilateral adductor-psoas tenotomy; however, the failure rate is relatively high with 34%–74% of patients with CP requiring secondary hip surgery. Using temporary medial hemiepiphysiodesis of the proximal femur (TMH-PF), the morphology of the hip can be changed. This technique aims to reduce further hip migration and the need for secondary surgical management. Further research is necessary to determine the benefit of TMH-PF in addition to adductor-psoas tenotomy. The hypothesis of this study is that TMH-PF combined with adductor-psoas release decreases the chance of progressive hip migration and the need for secondary hip surgery, compared with adductor-psoas release alone. Methods and analysis The GUIDANCE study is an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients with CP aged between 2 and 8 years, with spastic CP—Gross Motor Function Classification System IV or V, hip abduction ≤40° and hip migration of 30%–50% can be included in this trial. They will be randomised into a control arm (adductor-psoas tenotomy) or an intervention arm (adductor-psoas tenotomy+TMH PH). The primary outcome will be treatment failure at 5-year follow-up. At 2-year follow-up a preliminary analysis will be performed. Secondary outcomes will be differences in patient-reported outcome measures (CPCHILD and CPG pain score), range of motion, radiological measurements including head shaft angle and hip migration percentage and three-dimensional (3D) morphological changes to the proximal femur. Furthermore, an analysis will be performed to identify predictors for treatment failure in both treatment arms. Ethics and dissemination The GUIDANCE study should provide evidence on the effectiveness of TMH-PF in addition to adductor-psoas tenotomy in children with CP with early hip migration. If beneficial, larger hip reconstructive procedures can be delayed or prevented, providing a distinct benefit for these vulnerable children. The study’s strengths lie in its methodological framework, incorporating randomised allocation and intervention assessment. The main limitation is the inability to blind the treating physician or the researcher for the treatment arm the participant is allocated to. The results of the GUIDANCE study will be presented at scientific meetings and published in international peer-reviewed journals. The aim is to publish the results at 2 years follow-up and 5 years follow-up and to publish the results of the analysis on the 3D morphology of the hip after TMH-PF. Individual de-identified participant data that underlie the results from the GUIDANCE study and the study protocol will be shared if requested. Trial registration number Clinical Trial Registry number: NCT06118736. Registered on 3 November 2023.

Background: Worldwide a wide variation exists in duration of Pavlik harness treatment for infants up to 6 months with stable developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether shortening the time to first routine follow-up ultrasound after initiation of Pavlik harness treatment would reduce treatment duration and whether this influenced radiologic outcome at 1 year of age. Furthermore, predictors of higher acetabular index (AI) at 1 year of age were investigated. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in infants with stable DDH (Graf IIb and IIc) diagnosed and treated between 2015 and 2017. Two groups were identified: first routine follow-up ultrasound at 12 weeks after Pavlik harness initiation (group I) and first routine follow-up ultrasound at 6 weeks after Pavlik harness initiation (group II). In both groups, treatment was continued until repeat ultrasound measurements (every 6 wk) showed a normalized hip. Radiologic outcome at 1 year of age was defined as residual dysplasia measured on an anteroposterior hip radiograph according to the Tönnis table. Results: A total of 222 infants were included. The median time of Pavlik harness treatment was 12 weeks (interquartile range, 11.9 to 12.3) in group I compared with 6.1 weeks (interquartile range, 6.0 to 7.5) in group II (P<0.001). Residual dysplasia at 1 year of age was detected in 20 infants (16.8%) in group I compared with 11 infants (10.7%) in group II (P=0.189). The multivariable prediction model showed that positive family history and lower baseline alpha angle correlate with a higher AI at 1 year of age. Conclusions: First routine follow-up ultrasound can be safely brought forward from 12 to 6 weeks after Pavlik harness initiation. Furthermore, infants with a positive family history for DDH and an initial low alpha angle are at higher risk to have a higher AI at 1 year of age. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective study.

Compensatory motion of foot joints in hallux rigidus (HR) are not fully known. This study aimed to clarify the kinematic compensation within the foot and to detect whether this affects plantar pressure distribution. Gait characteristics were assessed in 16 patients (16 feet) with HR and compared with 15 healthy controls (30 feet) with three-dimensional gait analysis by using the multi-segment Oxford Foot Model, measuring spatio-temporal parameters, joint kinematics and plantar pressure. HR subjects showed less hallux plantar flexion during midstance and less hallux dorsiflexion during push-off, while increased forefoot supination was detected during push-off. No significant differences in plantar pressure were detected. Step length was significantly smaller in HR subjects, while gait velocity was comparable between groups. HR significantly affects sagittal hallux motion, and the forefoot compensates by an increased supination during push-off. Despite this kinematic compensatory mechanism, no significant differences in plantar loading were detected.

Objective: The objective of this study is to create an overview of the possible aetiologies of windswept deformity and to emphasize the points of attention when presented with a case. Methods: A systematic search according to the PRISMA statement was conducted using PubMed, African Journals Online, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Articles investigating the aetiology of windswept deformity at the knee in children, and articles with windswept deformity as an ancillary finding were included. The bibliographic search was limited to English-language articles only. The level of evidence and methodological appraisal were assessed. Results: Forty-five articles discussing the aetiology of windswept deformity were included. A variety of aetiologies can be brought forward. These can be divided into the following groups: ‘Rickets and other metabolic disorders’, ‘skeletal dysplasias and other genetic disorders’, ‘trauma’ and ‘descriptive articles without specific underlying disorder’. With rickets being the largest group. Interestingly, in the group without a specific underlying disorder, all patients were from African descent, being otherwise healthy and presented with windswept deformity between two and three years of age. Conclusion: We have presented an overview that may help identify the underlying disorder in children with windswept deformity. A step-by-step guide for clinicians who see a child with windswept deformity is provided. Even though, according to the Oxford level of evidence, most articles have a low level of evidence.