Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are slow growing, histologically benign intracranial tumors located in the sellar–suprasellar region. Although known to have low mortality, their location and relationship to the adjacent neural structures results in patients having significant neurologic, endocrine, and visual comorbidities. The invasive nature of this tumor makes complete resection a challenge and contributes to its recurrence. Additionally, these tumors are bimodally distributed, being treated with surgery, and are followed by other adjuncts, such as focused radiation therapy, e.g., Gamma knife. Advances in surgical techniques, imaging tools, and instrumentations have resulted in the evolution of surgery using endoscopic techniques, with residual components being treated by radiotherapy to target the residual tumor. Advances in molecular biology have elucidated the main pathways involved in tumor development and recurrence, but presently, no other treatments are offered to patients, besides surgery, radiation, and endocrine management, as the disease and tumor evolve. We review the contemporary management of these tumors, from the evolution of surgical treatments, utilizing standard open microscopic approaches to the more recent endoscopic surgery, and discuss the current recommendations for care of these patients. We discuss the developments in radiation therapy, such as radiosurgery, being used as treatment strategies for craniopharyngioma, highlighting their beneficial effects on tumor resections while decreasing the rates of adverse outcomes. We also outline the recent chemotherapy modalities, which help control tumor growth, and the immune landscape on craniopharyngiomas that allow the development of novel immunotherapies.

Chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy that has largely failed to significantly improve outcomes for aggressive brain tumors; some reasons include a weak blood brain barrier penetration and tumor heterogeneity. Recently, there has been interest in designing effective ways to deliver chemotherapy to the tumor. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of focused chemotherapies that are currently under investigation. Nanoparticle delivery demonstrates both a superior permeability and retention. However, thus far, it has not demonstrated a therapeutic efficacy for brain tumors. Convection-enhanced delivery is an invasive, yet versatile method, which appears to have the greatest potential. Other vehicles, such as angiopep-2 decorated gold nanoparticles, polyamidoamine dendrimers, and lipid nanostructures have demonstrated efficacy through sustained release of focused chemotherapy and have either improved cell death or survival in humans or animal models. Finally, focused ultrasound is a safe and effective way to disrupt the blood brain barrier and augment other delivery methods. Clinical trials are currently underway to study the safety and efficacy of these methods in combination with standard of care.

Focused ultrasound is a novel technique for the treatment of aggressive brain tumors that uses both mechanical and thermal mechanisms. This non-invasive technique can allow for both the thermal ablation of inoperable tumors and the delivery of chemotherapy and immunotherapy while minimizing the risk of infection and shortening the time to recovery. With recent advances, focused ultrasound has been increasingly effective for larger tumors without the need for a craniotomy and can be used with minimal surrounding soft tissue damage. Treatment efficacy is dependent on multiple variables, including blood–brain barrier permeability, patient anatomical features, and tumor-specific features. Currently, many clinical trials are currently underway for the treatment of non-neoplastic cranial pathologies and other non-cranial malignancies. In this article, we review the current state of surgical management of brain tumors using focused ultrasound.

Introduction: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is the inability to urinate after a surgical procedure despite having a full bladder. It is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery which has been extensively linked to increased patient morbidity and hospital costs. This study hopes to development and validate a predictive model for POUR following lumbar spine surgery using patient demographics, surgical and anesthesia variables.Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 903 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery over the period of June 2017 to June 2019 in a tertiary academic medical center. Four hundred and nineteen variables were collected including patient demographics, ICD-10 codes, and intraoperative factors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) regression and logistic regression models were compared. A decision tree model was fitted to the optimal model to classify each patient’s risk of developing POUR as high, intermediate, or low risk. Predictive performance of POUR was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).Results: 903 patients were included with average age 60 ± 15 years, body mass index of 30.5 ± 6.4 kg/m², 476 (53%) male, 785 (87%) white, 446 (49%) involving fusions, with average 2.1 ± 2.0 levels. The incidence of POUR was 235 (26%) with 63 (7%) requiring indwelling catheter placement. A decision tree was constructed with an accuracy of 87.8%.Conclusion: We present a highly accurate and easy to implement decision tree model which predicts POUR following lumbar spine surgery using preoperative and intraoperative variables.