Melike Kucukkarapinar

Dr. Melike Kucukkarapinar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 July 2022 in Journal of Neural Transmission
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
APAyşegül Yay Pençe
Ayşegül Yay Pençe
YYYesim Yildiz
Yesim Yildiz
MBMerve Buyukkoruk
Merve Buyukkoruk
GYGizem Yaz-Aydin
Gizem Yaz-Aydin
SCSelcuk Candansayar
Selcuk Candansayar

12 April 2021 in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
FKFiliz Karadag
Filiz Karadag
IBIrem Budakoglu
Irem Budakoglu
SASelcuk Aslan
Selcuk Aslan
OUOnder Ucar
Onder Ucar
IKIlknur Kiraz
Ilknur Kiraz
Affect,COVID-19 vaccines,risk perception,trust,vaccination refusal,worry

21 March 2024 in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
DEDamla Erbil
Damla Erbil
IKİlKer Keles
İlKer Keles
FKFiliz Karadag
Filiz Karadag
In this study, the relationship between treatment response, clinical features of episodes such as psychosis, suicidal behavior, and agitation, duration of hospitalization, and systemic inflammation markers Systemic Inflammatory Index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in bipolar affective disorder manic episode (BAD-M), bipolar affective disorder—depressive episode (BAD-D), and major depressive disorder (MDD) were investigated. TheNLR, MLR, PLR, and log SII were measured using parameters from a complete blood count. Admission and discharge Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores were evaluated. This is a retrospective study conducted with a total of 451 inpatients, 122 (27.10%) of whom were diagnosed with BAD-M, 60 (13.20%) with BAD-D, and 269 (56.60%) with MDD. The patients with manic episodes have higher levels of NLR (P = .019), MLR (P = .002), and log SII (P = .007). In the bipolar depression and mania groups, the patients with and without treatment responses did not differ in terms of inflammation markers; the log PLR value was found to be higher in the unipolar depression group in the patients who did not reach remission (P = .048). This study reveals associations between inflammation markers and different types of mood episodes. Higher NLR, MLR, and log SII levels in bipolar mania and lower NLR levels in agitated unipolar depression provide clues about changes in inflammation across different episodes. Studies with larger samples are needed to evaluate the relationship between inflammatory markers, the severity of mania and depression, and the response to treatment.

21 August 2014 in Australasian Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAli Ercan Altınöz
Ali Ercan Altınöz
ŞAŞengül Tosun Altınöz
Şengül Tosun Altınöz
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
BCBehçet Coşar
Behçet Coşar
Objective: Patients with delusional parasitosis (DP) have a fixed belief of being infested by small pathogens. Typical and atypical antipsychotics are widely used for treating DP. There are limited controlled trials about the treatment of DP and the most useful antipsychotic agent is still unknown. Paliperidone treatment for DP will be demonstrated through two cases. One of these cases had previously used pimozide but had not responded to treatment. Both cases had remission from symptoms with paliperidone. There are only two case reports published about paliperidone treatment for DP. Conclusion: Paliperidone appears to have promise in the treatment of DP; however, more case reports and controlled trials are required.

27 November 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
FKFiliz Karadag
Filiz Karadag
IBIrem Budakoglu
Irem Budakoglu
SASelcuk Aslan
Selcuk Aslan
OUOnder Ucar
Onder Ucar
IKIlknur Kiraz
Ilknur Kiraz
Background: This study aimed to explore the effect of knowledge, COVID-19-related perceptions, and public trust on protective behaviors in Turkish people. Methods: Data were collected from an online survey (Turkish COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring) conducted between July 2020 and January 2021. The recommended protective behaviors (hand cleaning, wearing a face mask, and physical distancing) to prevent COVID-19 were examined. The impacts of the following variables on protective behaviors were investigated using logistic regression analysis: knowledge, cognitive and affective risk perception, pandemic-related worry content, public trust, conspiracy thinking, and COVID-19 vaccine willingness. Results: Out of a total of 4210 adult respondents, 13.8% reported nonadherence to protection behavior, and 86.2% reported full adherence. Males and young (aged 18–30 years) people tend to show less adherence. Perceived self-efficacy, susceptibility, and correct knowledge were positively related to more adherence to protective behavior. Perceptual and emotional factors explaining protective behavior were perceived proximity, stress level, and worrying about the relatives who depended on them. Trust in health professionals and vaccine willingness were positive predictors, while conspiracy thinking and acquiring less information (<2, daily) were negative predictors. Unexpectedly, trust in the Ministry of Health showed a weak but negative association with protection behavior. Conclusions: Perceived stress, altruistic worries, and public trust seem to shape protection behaviors in addition to individuals’ knowledge and cognitive risk perception in respondents. Males and young people may have a greater risk for nonadherence. Reliable, transparent, and culture-specific health communication that considers these issues is required.

1 January 2020 in Archives of Neuropsychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMelike Kucukkarapinar
Melike Kucukkarapinar
ADAslihan Donmez
Aslihan Donmez
SCSelcuk Candansayar
Selcuk Candansayar
ABAruz Bozkurt
Aruz Bozkurt
EAElif Akcay
Elif Akcay
HBHayrunnisa Bolay Belen
Hayrunnisa Bolay Belen
Introduction: Interventions performed in the early period of life are associated with cognitive and behavioral changes in adulthood. The effects of interventions such as exposure to an early stressful life event or environmental enrichment on cognitive and behavioral development are studied. The aim of this study is to develop a new intervention method, to investigate the effects of early interventions on social interaction, memory anxiety levels and NR2B levels in prefrontal and hippocampus in adulthood. The hypothesis of the study is that exposure to the ambivalent mother will affect the behavioral performance of rats at least as much as one hour apart from the mother in the adult period and cause changes in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in the NR2B levels. Method: In the study, the Wistar rats were divided into four groups as control group (12), group that remained 15 minutes apart from mother (Mild Stress) (12), group that remained 60 minutes apart from mother (Severe Stress) (14) and ambivalent mother group (13). In adulthood, the social interaction test, elevated plus maze and new object recognition test performances of rats were evaluated. ELISA method was used to evaluate the effect of interventions on the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus NMDA R2B levels. Results: The important findings of the study were that in the new object recognition test, separation from the mother did not affect the recognition memory regardless of gender, while the short-term recognition memory of the females of the ambivalent mothers' group was better than the females in the other groups and the long-term memory performance of the mild stress groups men was better than the man in the other groups. In addition, in the social interaction test, the males of the ambivalent group and the mild stress group showed more aggressive behavior. It was determined that the prefrontal cortex NR2B level was higher in the mild stress and ambivalent mother group compared to the severe stress group, and NR2B level was increased in all intervention groups compared to the control group. Conclusion: In contrast to the hypothesis, the results of this study support that the ambivalent mother's group rats are not more adversely affected than the severe group rats and that the model created may be an environmental enrichment model rather than an early stressful life event exposure.