Ana Marreiros

Prof. Dr. Ana Marreiros

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 June 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBruna Costa
Bruna Costa
MEMarta F Estrada
Marta F Estrada
AGAntónio Gomes
António Gomes
LFLaura M. Fernandez
Laura M. Fernandez
JAJosé M. Azevedo
José M. Azevedo
Rita FiorRita Fior
Rita Fior
Cancer patients often undergo rounds of trial-and-error to find the most effective treatment because there is no test in the clinical practice for predicting therapy response. Here, we conduct a clinical study to validate the zebrafish patient-derived xenograft model (zAvatar) as a fast predictive platform for personalized treatment in colorectal cancer. zAvatars are generated with patient tumor cells, treated exactly with the same therapy as their corresponding patient and analyzed at single-cell resolution. By individually comparing the clinical responses of 55 patients with their zAvatar-test, we develop a decision tree model integrating tumor stage, zAvatar-apoptosis, and zAvatar-metastatic potential. This model accurately forecasts patient progression with 91% accuracy. Importantly, patients with a sensitive zAvatar-test exhibit longer progression-free survival compared to those with a resistant test. We propose the zAvatar-test as a rapid approach to guide clinical decisions, optimizing treatment options and improving the survival of cancer patients.

15 September 2017 in Acta Neurochirurgica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPedro Abreu
Pedro Abreu
JNJerina Nogueira
Jerina Nogueira
FRFilipe Brogueira Rodrigues
Filipe Brogueira Rodrigues
ANAna Nascimento
Ana Nascimento
MCMariana Carvalho
Mariana Carvalho
Hipolito NzwaloHipolito Nzwalo
Hipolito Nzwalo

1 January 2020 in Gene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHelena Caiado
Helena Caiado
NCNatércia Conceição
Natércia Conceição
DTDaniel Tiago
Daniel Tiago
AMAna Marreiros
Ana Marreiros
SVSusana Vicente
Susana Vicente
LCLeonor Cancela
Leonor Cancela

1 May 2019 in Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDina Bento
Dina Bento
OAOlga Azevedo
Olga Azevedo
RSRui Santos
Rui Santos
AAAna Almeida
Ana Almeida
KDKevin Domingues
Kevin Domingues
NMNuno Marques
Nuno Marques
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is characterized by transient left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. To characterize a Portuguese population with TTS and to determine their short- and medium-term prognosis. We conducted a multicenter study in Portuguese hospitals that included all patients diagnosed with TTS, initially retrospectively and subsequently prospectively. Short- and medium-term clinical complications and mortality were assessed. Independent predictors of in-hospital complications and prognostic factors were determined. A total of 234 patients (210 female, age 68±12 years) were included. During hospitalization, 32.9% of patients had complications: acute heart failure (24.4%), atrial fibrillation (9.0%), ventricular arrhythmias (2.6%), complete atrioventricular block (2.1%), stroke/transient ischemic attack (1.7%), and LV thrombus (1.3%). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p=0.02), coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=0.027), lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on admission (p=0.003), and dyspnea at presentation (p=0.019) were predictors of in-hospital complications. In-hospital mortality was 2.2%. At the mean follow-up of 33±33 months, all-cause mortality was 4.4%, cardiovascular mortality was 0.9% and TTS recurrence was 4.4%. Prolonged QTc interval on admission was associated with complications in follow-up (p=0.001). TTS has a good short- and medium-term prognosis. However, the rate of in-hospital complications is high and should not be overlooked. Dyspnea at presentation, CKD, CAD and lower LVEF on admission were independent predictors of in-hospital complications. Prolonged QTc on admission was associated with complications in follow-up.

20 November 2021 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHélder Constantino de Almeida Lousada
Hélder Constantino de Almeida Lousada
AMAndré Miguel Mestre
André Miguel Mestre
SRSara Ventura Ramalhete
Sara Ventura Ramalhete
APAryeh J Price
Aryeh J Price
Ramon Andrade Bezerra De MelloRamon Andrade Bezerra De Mello
Ramon Andrade Bezerra De Mello
PBPedro Castelo Branco
Pedro Castelo Branco
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an important bearing (top five) on cancer incidence and mortality in the world. The etiology of sporadic CRC is related to the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that result in the appearance of cancer hallmarks such as abnormal proliferation, evasion of immune destruction, resistance to apoptosis, replicative immortality, and others, contributing to cancer promotion, invasion, and metastasis. It is estimated that, each year, at least four million people are diagnosed with CRC in the world. Depending on CRC staging at diagnosis, many of these patients die, as CRC is in the top four causes of cancer death in the world. New and improved screening tests for CRC are needed to detect the disease at an early stage and adopt patient management strategies to decrease the death toll. The three pillars of CRC screening are endoscopy, radiological imaging, and molecular assays. Endoscopic procedures comprise traditional colonoscopy, and more recently, capsule-based endoscopy. The main imaging modality remains Computed Tomography (CT) of the colon. Molecular approaches continue to grow in the diversity of biomarkers and the sophistication of the technologies deployed to detect them. What started with simple fecal occult blood tests has expanded to an armamentarium, including mutation detection and identification of aberrant epigenetic signatures known to be oncogenic. Biomarker-based screening methods have critical advantages and are likely to eclipse the classical modalities of imaging and endoscopy in the future. For example, imaging methods are costly and require highly specialized medical personnel. In the case of endoscopy, their invasiveness limits compliance from large swaths of the population, especially those with average CRC risk. Beyond mere discomfort and fear, there are legitimate iatrogenic concerns associated with endoscopy. The risks of perforation and infection make endoscopy best suited for a confirmatory role in cases where there are positive results from other diagnostic tests. Biomarker-based screening methods are largely non-invasive and are growing in scope. Epigenetic biomarkers, in particular, can be detected in feces and blood, are less invasive to the average-risk patient, detect early-stage CRC, and have a demonstrably superior patient follow-up. Given the heterogeneity of CRC as it evolves, optimal screening may require a battery of blood and stool tests, where each can leverage different pathways perturbed during carcinogenesis. What follows is a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature pertaining to the screening and diagnostic protocols used in CRC. Relevant articles were retrieved from the PubMed database using keywords including: “Screening”, “Diagnosis”, and “Biomarkers for CRC”. American and European clinical trials in progress were included as well.

1 September 2017 in Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hipolito NzwaloHipolito Nzwalo
Hipolito Nzwalo
JNJerina Nogueira
Jerina Nogueira
CFCatarina Félix
Catarina Félix
PGPatrícia Guilherme
Patrícia Guilherme
ABAlexandre Baptista
Alexandre Baptista
NLNicola Logallo
Nicola Logallo