Reham Zare Alrwaitey

Ms. Reham Zare Alrwaitey


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2022 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAManal F. ALHARBI
Manal F. ALHARBI
RAReham Zare Alrwaitey
Reham Zare Alrwaitey
Background: This study investigated the psychological empowerment (PE) of nurses in pediatric units and examined the significant difference between the level of PE and the personal work profiles of nurses working in pediatric units in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A quantitative descriptive study design was employed between May and July 2020 using a self-administered electronic survey that collected personal work profile data and applied the Psychological Empowerment Scale. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software for descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVA. Results: Most of the study participants (69.6%) were non-Saudi nurses, and 71.9% worked in specialized areas. The mean PE score of the four dimensions across the 12 items was high. The mean score for the dimension meaning was the highest, whereas the lowest mean score was for the dimension self-determination. Nurses from different nationalities had significantly different PE levels. Conclusions: Expatriate nurses were more psychologically empowered. The findings will be of interest to all who wish to attract and retain local nurses by fostering PE in the work environment and involving nurses in decision-making processes, thus enabling them to act as leaders for increased work motivation.

9 September 2026 in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLance G. Tolentino
Lance G. Tolentino
Marharyta KhaustovaMarharyta Khaustova
Marharyta Khaustova
RAReham Zare Alrwaitey
Reham Zare Alrwaitey
ACAsiya S. Chintala
Asiya S. Chintala
DBDebasrita Baidya
Debasrita Baidya
MAMuhammad Ayyan
Muhammad Ayyan
Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated clinical activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SG compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases for RCTs comparing SG with standard treatment in patients with breast cancer. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control measures, and treatment-related adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs encompassing 2481 patients were included. SG significantly improved PFS ( HR =0.59), OS ( HR =0.63), and ORR ( RR =1.64) compared with chemotherapy. CBR was also significantly higher with SG ( RR =1.89), and the rate of progressive disease was significantly lower ( RR =0.62). Overall treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups ( RR =1.05). Neutropenia and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in the SG group. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows that sacituzumab govitecan significantly improves PFS, OS, and ORR compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Although associated with higher rates of neutropenia and diarrhea, its overall safety profile remains manageable. These results reinforce the role of SG as an effective treatment option for both metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2− breast cancer and support its continued evaluation in earlier treatment settings and combination strategies, including immunotherapy.