Background: The increased rates of postoperative mortality after emergency surgery for obstructive colon cancer (OCC) require the use of risk-stratification scores. The study purpose is to external validate the surgical risk calculator (SRC) and the AFC/OCC score and to create a score for risk stratification. Patients and methods: Overall, 435 patients with emergency surgery for OCC were included in this retrospective study. We used statistical methods suitable for the aimed purpose. Results: Postoperative mortality was 11.72%. SRC performance: strong discrimination (AUC = 0.864) and excellent calibration (11.80% predicted versus 11.72% observed); AFC/OCC score performance: adequate discrimination (AUC = 0.787) and underestimated mortality (6.93% predicted versus 11.72% observed). We identified nine predictors of postoperative mortality: age > 70 years, CHF, ECOG > 2, sepsis, obesity or cachexia, creatinine (aN) or platelets (aN), and proximal tumors (AUC = 0.947). Based on the score, we obtained four risk groups of mortality rate: low risk (0.7%)—0–2 factors, medium risk (12.5%)—3 factors, high risk (40.0%)—4 factors, very high risk (84.4%)—5–6 factors. Conclusions: The two scores were externally validated. The easy identification of predictors and its performance recommend the mortality score of the Clinic County Emergency Hospital of Galați/OCC for clinical use.

Reflux disease continues to be one of the most common pathologies in the world. There is much discussion regarding the mechanism of developing and the variety of possible symptoms. In recent years, the use of new technologies, like high-resolution manometry and pH impedance, brought new insights into this disease. Also, there are emerging therapies that are covering the gap between the patients treated with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and those who benefit the most from laparoscopic treatment (hiatal hernia, complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Also, most of them are less invasive than a laparoscopic fundoplication. We present a short review of the treatment options in patients who need more than lifestyle changes and PPI therapy.

Introduction: Achalasia is a motility disorder characterized by the absence of optimal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with swallowing and lack of peristalsis of the esophageal body. Excepting temporary medical options, the treatment aims to lower the LES pressure by endoscopic or surgical means. Either method involves a risk of perforation. We analyzed the management of esophageal perforations in patients who received treatment for achalasia. Material and Method: we conducted a retrospective study of patients with achalasia hospitalised and treated in the Clinic of General and Esophageal Surgery within the Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital in Bucharest between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: There were 57 patients, 35 men, with a mean age of 50 years and a mean duration of symptoms of 35 months. Almost all (91.89%) patients presented with dysphagia. Preoperative manometry was performed in 52 patients, of whom 17 were type I, 35 were type II. The treatment was laparoscopic Heller eso-cardiomyotomy (LHM) in most cases (55), with Dor anterior fundoplication. There were 10 recurrent cases after dilation or surgery in another medical unit. There were 3 mucosal perforations after LHM. The treatment varied from simple suture to a combined endoscopic and surgical approach, involving the use of esophageal stent, abscess drainage, and feeding jejunostomy. We also present the management of two cases of esophageal perforation after endoscopic dilation, in which the support of the surgical team was necessary. Conclusion: Esophageal perforation in the treatment of achalasia, either endoscopic or surgical, requires immediate identification and treatment to provide the best chance of favorable evolution. The treatment of achalasia is indicated to be performed in dedicated centers, prepared even in case of complications.