Brain biopsy is the gold standard in order to establish the diagnosis of unresectable brain tumors. Few studies have investigated the long-term outcomes of biopsy patients. The aim of this single-institution-based study was to assess the concordance between radiological and histopathological diagnoses, and the long-term patient outcome. Ninety-three patients who underwent brain biopsy in the last 5 years were analyzed. We included patients treated with stereotactically guided needle, open, and neuroendoscopic biopsies. Most patients (86%) received needle biopsy. Gliomas and primary brain lymphomas comprised 88.2% of cases. The diagnostic yield was 95.7%. Serious complication and death rates were 3.2% and 2.1%, respectively. The concordance rate between radiological and histological diagnoses was 93%. Notably, the positive predictive value of radiological diagnosis of lymphoma was 100%. Biopsy allowed specific treatment in 72% of cases. Disease-related neurological worsening was the main reason that precluded adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatment, in turn, was the strongest prognostic factor, since the median overall survival was 11 months with vs. 2 months without treatment (p = 0.0002). Finally, advanced molecular evaluations can be obtained on glioma biopsy specimens to provide integrated diagnoses and individually tailored treatments. We conclude that, despite the huge advances in imaging techniques, biopsy is required when an adjuvant treatment is recommended, particularly in gliomas.

Introduction The treatment of acromegaly resistant to first and second line therapies may be extremely challenging. Aim, patients and methods To describe our patients successfully treated with a combination therapy of Pasireotide LAR and Pegvisomant and to compare with a control group of patients resistant to conventional somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and controlled with other treatments, such as Pasireotide LAR (in monotherapy) and Pegvisomant (in monotherapy or in association with conventional SSAs). Results A total of 6 patients reached acromegaly disease control with Pasireotide Lar and Pegvisomant combination treatment, after failure with all other treatments. As compared to the 49 patients of the control group, these 6 patients carried giant and invasive pituitary adenomas (both at the cavernous sinus and at other structures). Although not statistically significant, higher values of growth hormone at acromegaly diagnosis, a more elevated Ki67, a higher expression of the subtype 5 and a lower expression of the subtype 2 of the somatostatin receptor were detected in patients on a combination treatment with Pasireotide Lar and Pegvisomant, as compared to the control group. Conclusion Our data reinforced the importance of a personalized treatment of acromegaly, according to clinical, biochemical, molecular and morphological disease markers and suggests that the associative treatment with Pasireotide LAR and Pegvisomant can induce disease control in tumors with a low expression of SSTR2, resistant to conventional SSAs (alone or in association with Pegvisomant) and to new generation SSAs alone (Pasireotide LAR).

5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced PpIX fluorescence is used by neurosurgeons to identify the tumor cells of high-grade gliomas during operation. However, the issue of whether 5-ALA-induced PpIX fluorescence consistently stains all the tumor cells is still debated. Here, we assessed the cytoplasmatic signal of 5-ALA by fluorescence microscopy in a series of human gliomas. As tumor markers, we used antibodies against collapsin response-mediated protein 5 (CRMP5), alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX), and anti-isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). In grade III–IV gliomas, the signal induced by 5-ALA was detected in 32.7–75.5 percent of CRMP5-expressing tumor cells. In low-grade gliomas (WHO grade II), the CRMP5-expressing tumor cells did not fluoresce following 5-ALA. Immunofluorescence with antibodies that stain various components of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) suggested that 5-ALA does not cross the un-breached BBB, in spite of its small dimension. To conclude, 5-ALA-induced PpIX fluorescence has an established role in high-grade glioma surgery, but it has limited usefulness in surgery for low-grade glioma, especially when the BBB is preserved.

Neuralgic amyotrophy, also called Parsonage–Turner syndrome, in its classic presentation is a brachial plexopathy or a multifocal neuropathy, involving mainly motor nerves of the upper limb with a monophasic course. Recently, a new radiological entity was described, the hourglass constriction, which is characterized by a very focal constriction of a nerve, or part of it, usually associated with nerve thickening proximally and distally to the constriction. Another condition, which is similar from a radiological point of view to hourglass constriction, is nerve torsion. The pathophysiology of neuralgic amyotrophy, hourglass constriction and nerve torsion is still poorly understood, and a generic role of inflammation is proposed for all these conditions. It is now widely accepted that nerve imaging is necessary in identifying hourglass constrictions/nerve torsion pre-surgically in patients with an acute mononeuropathy/plexopathy. Ultrasound and MRI are useful tools for diagnosis, and they are consistent with intraoperative findings. The prognosis is generally favorable after surgery, with a high rate of good motor recovery.

Background: Prolactinomas represent a unique challenge for endocrinologists and neurosurgeons. Considering recent innovations in surgical practice, the authors aimed to investigate the best management for prolactinomas. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional and monocentric study was designed. Consecutive patients affected by prolactinomas were enrolled if treated with a first-line treatment with a dopamine agonist (DA) or trans-sphenoidal surgery (TSS). Patients carried giant prolactinomas, and those with a follow-up <12 months were excluded. Results: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The first treatment was DA for 140 patients and TS for 119 cases. One hundred and forty-six of 249 patients (58.6%) needed a second therapy. The mean follow-up was 102.2 months (12–438 months). Surgery highly impacted on the cure rate—in particular, in females (p = 0.0021) and in microprolactinomas (p = 0.0020). Considering the multivariate analysis, the female gender and surgical treatment in the course of the clinical history were the only independent positive predictors of a cure at the end of 5 years follow-up (p = 0.0016, p = 0.0005). The evaluation of serum prolactin (24 hours after TSS) revealed that 86.4% of patients with postoperative prolactin (PRL) ≤10 ng/mL were cured at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: According to our experience, surgery allows a high cure rate of prolactinomas, particularly in females with microadenoma, with a good safety profile. TSS for prolactinomas should be considered as a concrete option, during the multidisciplinary evaluation, in centers of reference for pituitary diseases.