Manuel Wilbring

Dr. Manuel Wilbring

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Dresden, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWManuel Wilbring
Manuel Wilbring
KAKonstantin Alexiou
Konstantin Alexiou
STSems Malte Tugtekin
Sems Malte Tugtekin
SASebastian Arzt
Sebastian Arzt
KIKarim Ibrahim
Karim Ibrahim
UKUtz Kappert
Utz Kappert

1 January 2013 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWManuel Wilbring
Manuel Wilbring
KAKonstantin Alexiou
Konstantin Alexiou
STSems Malte Tugtekin
Sems Malte Tugtekin
BSBjoern Sill
Bjoern Sill
PHPeter Hammer
Peter Hammer
UKUtz Kappert
Utz Kappert

22 January 2013 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWManuel Wilbring
Manuel Wilbring
STSems-Malte Tugtekin
Sems-Malte Tugtekin
KAKonstantin Alexiou
Konstantin Alexiou
GSGregor Simonis
Gregor Simonis
KMKlaus Matschke
Klaus Matschke
UKUtz Kappert
Utz Kappert
The present analysis compared clinical and mid-term outcomes of patients with previous cardiac surgery undergoing transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with propensity-matched patients undergoing conventional redo aortic valve replacement (cAVR). Since 2008, 508 patients were treated with TAVI. Fifty-three of these patients presented with a history of cardiac surgery and underwent transapical TAVI using the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. A propensity-matched control group of 53 patients receiving cAVR was generated out of the hospital's database. The mean age for all the patients was 77.8 ± 4.5 years. The logistic EuroSCORE was 28.4 ± 13.6% in mean, and mean EuroSCORE II was 8.56 ± 3.93%. The mean follow-up time was 245 ± 323 days, which equated to a total of 700 patient-months. The observed hospital mortality did not differ significantly between TAVI and cAVR (TAVI: 9.4% and cAVR: 5.7%; P = 0.695). Six-month survival was 83.0% for the TAVI and 86.8% for the cAVR patients (P = 0.768). Postoperative bleedings (TAVI: 725 ± 1770 ml and cAVR: 1884 ± 6387; P = 0.022), the need for transfusion (TAVI: 1.7 ± 5.3 vs cAVR: 6.2 ± 13.7 units packed red blood cells (PRBC); P = 0.030), consecutive rethoracotomy (TAVI: 1.9% vs cAVR: 16.9%; P = 0.002) and postoperative delirium (TAVI: 11.5% vs cAVR: 28.3%; P = 0.046) were more common in the cAVR patients. The TAVI patients suffered more frequently from respiratory failure (TAVI: 11.3% vs cAVR: 0.0%; P = 0.017) and mean grade of paravalvular regurgitation (TAVI: 0.8 ± 0.2 vs cAVR: 0.0; P = 0.047). Although primary ventilation time (P = 0.020) and intensive care unit stay (P = 0.022) were shorter in the TAVI patients, mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (P = 0.108). Transapical TAVI as well as surgical aortic valve replacement provided good clinical results. The pattern of postoperative morbidity and mortality was different for both entities, but the final clinical outcome did not differ significantly. Both techniques can be seen as complementary approaches by means of developing a tailor-made and patient-orientated surgery.

4 March 2014 in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWManuel Wilbring
Manuel Wilbring
LILinda Irmscher
Linda Irmscher
KAKonstantin Alexiou
Konstantin Alexiou
KMKlaus Matschke
Klaus Matschke
STSems-Malte Tugtekin
Sems-Malte Tugtekin
Infective native valve endocarditis (NVE) complicated by a preoperative neurological event still remains a surgical challenge. Particularly, great uncertainty exists with regard to the optimal timing of surgery. We call for a multidisciplinary team approach for individualized risk estimation and analysed our experience obtained over the past decade. Between 1997 and 2012, a total of 495 patients underwent valve surgery for the treatment of NVE. Of these, 70 (14.1%) patients suffered from NVE complicated by an acute neurological event and formed the study group. The remaining 425 (85.9%) patients served as the control group. The mean age of the predominantly male (80.0%) study population was 54 ± 14 years. EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II predicted a high surgical risk (24.9 ± 6.8 and 10.8 ± 8.1%, respectively). The mean follow-up time was 4.0 ± 3.1 years, ranging up to 15.6 years with an interquartile range from 1.7 to 5.4 years. An interdisciplinary team consisting of a cardiac surgeon, a cardiologist and a neurologist made the decision for surgery. Observed neurological deficits mainly consisted of ischaemic stroke (75.7%), meningoencephalitis (12.9%) and intracerebral haemorrhage (8.6%). The mean time interval between the neurological event and surgery was 8.7 ± 10.3 days for all patients, 8.0 ± 7.0 days for ischaemic stroke and 17 ± 24 days for intracerebral haemorrhage. Postoperatively, most of the patients experienced no change (22.9%) or even improvement (67.1%) of their neurological symptoms. Only 10.0% showed further deterioration of their neurological status. This was particularly true for patients suffering from intracerebral haemorrhage, with 33.3% experiencing further neurological impairment. The presence of a preoperative neurological event was identified as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (OR 2.66; 95% CI: 1.02–6.78; P = 0.046) but not for mortality during further follow-up (P = 0.257). The hospital mortality rate was 17.2%; and the 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 74.3, 68 ± 5.0 and 67.1 ± 9.0%, respectively. NVE complicated by neurological events remains a challenging disease with high mortality and morbidity. Cardiac surgery seemed to be safe in the observed time interval, particularly for patients suffering from ischaemic stroke. A multidisciplinary approach is advocated for very individualized risk estimation.

3 March 2011 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWManuel Wilbring
Manuel Wilbring
STSems Malte Tugtekin
Sems Malte Tugtekin
BZBirgit Zatschler
Birgit Zatschler
AEAnette Ebner
Anette Ebner
HRHermann Reichenspurner
Hermann Reichenspurner
ADAndreas Deussen
Andreas Deussen
A faultless endothelial layer is decisive for vascular function and therewith graft's patency. Functional impairment of the endothelium increases risk of graft thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia, and consecutive accelerated graft atherosclerosis. Storage solutions for intra-operatively harvested saphenous vein segments (SVS) might have significant impact on endothelial function. We investigated the impact of short-time storage in physiological saline solution (PSS) and a potassium-chloride- and N-acetylhistidine-enriched storage solution on venous endothelial function. Intra-operatively isolated SVSs (n=19) were stored in different storage solutions for 90 min. They were then immediately studied in tissue bath at 36°C with continuous oxygen insufflation. Following preconstriction with norepinephrine, dose-response relaxation curves of bradykinine (Brad) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were determined. We compared developed maximum wall tension, vessel constriction kinetics, endothelial cell- and smooth muscle cell (SMC)-dependent vasodilatory function. Maximum vessel wall tension was reduced significantly in PSS-stored vessels (10.1 ± 9.8 mN mm(-1) vs 3.5 ± 3.4 mN mm(-1); p=0.0372). Endothelium-derived vasodilatory function was likewise significantly reduced after short-time storage (20.6 ± 34.4% vs 35.0 ± 27.0%; p=0.0437). SNP-mediated SMC-vasodilatory function was maintained equally well in both groups (88.2 ± 21.8% vs 83.0 ± 30.6% in PSS; p=n.s.). Even short-time storage in PSS significantly impairs endothelial vascular function. Concerning the essential role of a faultless endothelial layer, the quite common use of PSS as a storage solution for SVSs in CABG surgery has to be discussed critically.

13 April 2023 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTorsten Doenst
Torsten Doenst
PBPaolo Berretta
Paolo Berretta
Nikolaos BonarosNikolaos Bonaros
Nikolaos Bonaros
CSCarlo Savini
Carlo Savini
APAntonios Pitsis
Antonios Pitsis
MEMarco Di Eusanio
Marco Di Eusanio
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive access has become the preferred choice in mitral and/or tricuspid valve surgery. Reported outcomes are at least similar to classic sternotomy although aortic cross-clamp times are usually longer. METHODS: We analysed the largest registry of mitral and/or tricuspid valve surgery patients (mini-mitral international registry (MMIR)) for the relationship between aortic cross-clamp times, mortality and other outcomes. From 2015 to 2021, 7513 consecutive patients underwent mini-mitral and/or tricuspid valve surgery in 17 international Heart-Valve-Centres. Data were collected according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) definitions and 6878 patients with 1 cross-clamp period were analysed. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess outcomes in relation to aortic cross-clamp times. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years (57% male). Median EuroSCORE II was 1.3% (Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR): 0.80–2.63). Minimally invasive access was either by direct vision (28%), video-assisted (41%) or totally endoscopic/robotic (31%). Femoral cannulation was used in 93%. Three quarters were repairs with 17% additional tricuspid valve surgery and 19% Atrial Fibrillation (AF)-ablation. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 135 min (IQR: 107–173) and 85 min (IQR: 64–111), respectively. Postoperative events were death (1.6%), stroke (1.2%), bleeding requiring revision (6%), low cardiac output syndrome (3.5%) and acute kidney injury (6.2%, mainly stage I). Statistical analyses identified significant associations between cross-clamp time and mortality, low cardiac output syndrome and acute kidney injury (all P < 0.001). Age, low ejection fraction and emergent surgery were risk factors, but variables of ‘increased complexity’ (redo, endocarditis, concomitant procedures) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic cross-clamp time is associated with mortality as well as postoperatively impaired cardiac and renal function. Thus, implementing measures to reduce cross-clamp time may improve outcomes.