Guo-Wei Ma

Dr. Guo-Wei Ma

The Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2020 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLeilei Wu
Leilei Wu
XLXuan Liu
Xuan Liu
WJWen-Mei Jiang
Wen-Mei Jiang
WHWei Huang
Wei Huang
PLPeng Lin
Peng Lin
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
Objective: To assess the postoperative prognosis of patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), using a prognostic model (PM). Methods: Patients with stage IB of NSCLC from the two academic databases {the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER-A, N = 1,746 (training cohort)], Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center [SYSUCC, N = 247 (validation cohort)], and SEER-B (N = 1,745)} who had undergone lung surgery from 2001 to 2015 were enrolled. The primary clinical endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Covariate inclusion of prognostic indicators was carried out using a multivariable two-sided P < 0.05. We identified and integrated significant prognostic factors for survival in the training cohort to build a model that could be validated in the validation cohort. We used univariate analysis to evaluate the utilized ability of PM in the different races/ethnicities. Results: CSS discrimination in the PM was comparable in both the training and validation cohorts [C index = 0.66(SEER-A), 0.67(SYSUCC), and 0.61(SEER-B), respectively]. Discretization with a fixed PM cutoff of 291.5 determined from the training dataset yielded low- and high-risk subgroups with disparate CSS in the validation cohort (training cohort: hazard ratio [HR] 2.724, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 2.074–3.577; validation cohort: SEER-B HR 1.679, 95% CI, 1.310–2.151, SYSUCC HR 3.649, 95% CI 2.203–6.043, all P < 0.05). Our five-factor PM was able to predict CSS; 48-month CSS was 87% in the low-risk subgroup vs. 69% in the high-risk subgroup for the training cohort, while in the validation cohort, they were 80 vs. 73%(SEER-B) and 84 vs. 60% (SYSUCC), respectively. In addition, the results showed that PM with all unadjusted HR > 1 was a significant risk prognostic indictor in white men (P < 0.001), Chinese people (P < 0.001), and other races (P = 0.012). Conclusion: We established and validated a PM that may predict CSS for patients with IB NSCLC in different races/ethnicities, and thus, help clinicians screen subgroups with poor prognosis. In addition, further prospective studies and more cases from different regions are necessary to confirm our findings.

1 September 2015
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLiang Wang
Liang Wang
YLYongbin Lin
Yongbin Lin
QCQingqing Cai
Qingqing Cai
HLHao Long
Hao Long
YZYu Zhang
Yu Zhang
YLYing Liang
Ying Liang
Detection of rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) and mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) in primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

15 April 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QMQilong Ma
Qilong Ma
WLWengao Liu
Wengao Liu
RJRan Jia
Ran Jia
HLHao Long
Hao Long
LZLanjun Zhang
Lanjun Zhang
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
Alcohol and survival in ESCC: Prediagnosis alcohol consumption and postoperative survival in lymph node-negative esophageal carcinoma patients

18 September 2019 in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WHWei Huang
Wei Huang
LWLeilei Wu
Leilei Wu
XLXuan Liu
Xuan Liu
HLHao Long
Hao Long
TRTiehua Rong
Tiehua Rong
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
Objectives: This study tested the relationship between preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and cancer-specific prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone curative resection.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 961 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy from 2006 to 2012 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Preoperative serum CRP levels were determined, and a cutoff value of 5.0 mg/mL was established. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias between patients with low CRP (≤ 5.0 mg/mL) and those with high CRP (> 5.0 mg/mL) levels based on age, tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and tumor grade. The prognostic value of preoperative CRP levels was determined using life table, Kaplan–Meier, and Cox proportional hazards analyzes.Results: In the unmatched cohort, the 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 57 and 53%, respectively, in patients with high preoperative CRP levels (> 5.0 mg/mL) and 68 and 56%, respectively, in those with low preoperative CRP levels (≤ 5.0 mg/mL). The difference in the survival rates of the 2 groups was significant (p = 0.004). Univariate survival analysis revealed that the preoperative CRP levels, TNM stage, tumor grade, drinking history, and anastomosis method were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Before conducting PSM, the low-CRP group had a lower age (p = 0.001), lower histological grade (p = 0.086), and lower TNM stage (p = 0.254).After PSM, 176 patients with low CRP levels and 176 of those with high CRP levels were enrolled in the analysis. In the matched cohort, the 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 56 and 50%, respectively, in patients with high preoperative CRP levels (> 5.0 mg/mL) and 68 and 56%, respectively, in those with low preoperative CRP levels (≤ 5.0 mg/mL). The difference in the survival rates between the low- and high-CRP groups was significant (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis of the matched patients revealed that the TNM stage and preoperative CRP level were independent prognostic factors for OS.Conclusions: A high preoperative CRP level (> 5.0 mg/mL) predicts worse survival prognosis in patients who have undergone curative resection for esophageal squamous cell cancer.

18 September 2015 in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QMQilong Ma
Qilong Ma
WLWengao Liu
Wengao Liu
HLHao Long
Hao Long
TRTiehua Rong
Tiehua Rong
LZLanjun Zhang
Lanjun Zhang
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
To compare the right and left transthoracic approach on the post-operative survival of patients with lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Six hundred and ninety-five ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively enrolled in the present study and were confirmed by histology to be of no lymph node metastasis. Those who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups, the left (n = 545) and right (n = 150) transthoracic groups. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 20 years with a mean of 7 years. Kaplan–Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used for analysis. 3- and 5-year CSS rates were 62.0 % and 44.0 % in the left group, while the corresponding figures in the right group were 56.0 % and 40.0 %(P < 0.05). The overall survival for the two groups was significantly different (P = 0.045). Survival analyses were stratified by stages, which found that the favorable survival advantage was not present. When the survival curves were stratified by tumor locations, a significant difference was not revealed. Surgical approaches were regarded as one of the prognostic factors in the univariate analysis (P = 0.019). However, this significance could not be confirmed in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.193). The left transthoracic approach is superior in some aspects to the right transthoracic approach regarding surgical and oncological outcomes in the treatment of lymph node negative ESCC.

28 January 2022 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLeilei Wu
Leilei Wu
JZJiu-Di Zhong
Jiu-Di Zhong
JZJia-Li Zhu
Jia-Li Zhu
LKLu Kang
Lu Kang
YHYang-Yu Huang
Yang-Yu Huang
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
Background: The postoperative survival effect of the number of examined lymph nodes on patients of R0-resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pathological stage T1–3N0M0 is still unclear. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pathological stage T1–3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from two cancer databases—our cancer center (N = 707), and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (N = 151). The primary clinical endpoint was overall survival. The X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the number of examined lymph nodes, and propensity score matching was conducted to reduce selection bias according to the results of X-tile software. The cohort of 151 patients from another database was used for validation. Results: X-tile software provided an optimal cutoff value of 15 examined lymph nodes based on 707 patients, and 231 pairs of matched patients were included. In the unmatched cohort, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed better overall survival in patients with more than 15 examined lymph nodes (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.566, 95% confidence interval, 0.445–0.720; p < 0.001) compared with patients with 15 or fewer examined lymph nodes. In the validation cohort, patients with more than 15 examined lymph nodes also had better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.665, p = 0.047). Conclusions: The number of examined lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with pathological stage T1–3N0M0, and more than 15 examined lymph nodes are associated with better overall survival. Although the difference is not significant, the survival curve of patients with examined lymph nodes > 30 is better than those with examined lymph nodes 15–30. We believe that the number of examined lymph nodes can provide prognostic guidance for those patients, and the more examined lymph nodes cause lesser occult lymph nodes metastasis and lead to a better prognosis. Therefore, surgeons and pathologists should try to examine as many lymph nodes as possible to evaluate the pathological stage precisely. However, we need more validation from other studies.